New Redemption Grab Bag now includes an assortment of 500 cards from five (5) different expansion sets. Available at Cactus website.
lulz at nvidia '3-d'. can we even call it that? you know, you can add as much perfume as you want to crap...but in the end, its still crap....oh, btw, killzone 3 has a confirmed release date of feb 22, 2011. goodbye pc graphics, hello true 3-d (and hello sony bravia 3dtv for me).
yup, the 3d demos are all over youtube.
Quote from: Master KChief on September 09, 2010, 07:39:46 PMyup, the 3d demos are all over youtube.Like flies on poop?
postcount.add(1);
Quote from: Master_Chi on September 09, 2010, 07:41:15 PMQuote from: Master KChief on September 09, 2010, 07:39:46 PMyup, the 3d demos are all over youtube.Like flies on poop?well, this is true 3d, not nvidia 3d.
Says the person who's never tried it. Based on the same factor, Killzone 3 is nothing more than yet another halo clone. And it can't even rip something off correctly.
i've never played a kz game myself, but as kittens pointed out, its pretty much a halo/gow-esque kind of fps. with cod and halo dominating the market, other fps' pretty much walk in their shadow and dont get noticed all that much. hopefully people will be drawn in by the 3d.
Quote from: SomeKittens on September 09, 2010, 07:45:36 PMSays the person who's never tried it. Based on the same factor, Killzone 3 is nothing more than yet another halo clone. And it can't even rip something off correctly.since when were we discussing story material versus graphical performance? i could care less if it was a man on a mission to save a ham sandwich...ITS FREAKIN' TRUE 3D! it is also not necessary for anyone to try it when anyone can see, for fact, it is a real 3d game.
Quote from: Master KChief on September 09, 2010, 08:05:13 PMi've never played a kz game myself, but as kittens pointed out, its pretty much a halo/gow-esque kind of fps. with cod and halo dominating the market, other fps' pretty much walk in their shadow and dont get noticed all that much. hopefully people will be drawn in by the 3d.Very true. It's probably one of those games that you have to know EVERYTHING about it, like UFC Undisputed. I prefer button-masher fighting games.
I still, from the vantage point of never having anything to do with it, think it's terrible. And all the three-dee stinks.
Which is all well and good, if you like bland fps action (I don't), but that doesn't make the console "better".
As to the 3D, PC had it first.
...so the only solid fact is that we had it years before you.
I would hazard a guess that most of the research come from us.
QuoteWhich is all well and good, if you like bland fps action (I don't), but that doesn't make the console "better".3d versus non-3d...hmm, yeah, thats a tough call there...
I'd rather play a 2D Portal 2 than a 3D (insert bland FPS here) any day of the week.
Look at your hand. It has three dimensions. Look at your screen. No matter how images may appear to be 3D, it is not truly three-dimensional.
this entire discussion has been about true 3d (and lets clarify, when i say true 3d, i mean the best the industry can push out currently, which is the kind that is viewed on 3dtv's)...
As to subjective, your argument that an entire gaming platform is better due to it having a certain type of graphics capability is entirely subjective.
you were the only one that has brought up actual 3 dimensional
if you argued that super nintendo graphics were better than xbox 360 graphics, i would be ashamed to call you a gamer.
oops.
If you argued that Shadowrun was a better game than Super Mario Brothers because it had better graphics, I'd be ashamed to call you a gamer.
QuoteIf you argued that Shadowrun was a better game than Super Mario Brothers because it had better graphics, I'd be ashamed to call you a gamer.ooo, is this a straw man??? i believe it is!!!
Point 1. You used the words "Real 3D". I can either read your mind (which I can't), or take your words literally. I won't accept responsibility for your inability to communicate.
Point 2. You have very much to learn. Do some actual research before using a term like "straw man", so you won't look like as much of an idiot when you shoot your mouth off.
Subpoint A. This is not an example of a "Straw Man" argument. You can clearly tell by my use of the word "if". It was a hypothetical situation, rather than postulating you said something you didn't.
The straw man fallacy occurs in the following pattern of argument:1.Person A has position X.2.Person B disregards certain key points of X and instead presents the superficially-similar position Y.
Subpoint B. I simply rephrased something you said.
you should take responsibility for the inability to comprehend.