Author Topic: Hearthstone  (Read 216359 times)

Offline Drrek

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2244
  • The Bee of the Sea
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Hearthstone
« Reply #300 on: August 29, 2014, 01:01:32 PM »
0
I'm with Lambo on that one - Raggy can fit into a lot of decks.

I mean he can, but there are quite a few legendaries he doesn't have that can fit into many decks, like Harrison and sylvannas
The user formerly known as Easty.

Lamborghini_diablo

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Hearthstone
« Reply #301 on: August 29, 2014, 01:55:18 PM »
0
Ragnaros is nice because you get immediate value out of him, silencing him does almost nothing, and he has a solid vanilla value.

I can't really think of a downside to Ragnaros. Even if he gets big game huntered, you still dealt a minimum of 8 damage to something.

Offline Drrek

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2244
  • The Bee of the Sea
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Hearthstone
« Reply #302 on: August 29, 2014, 02:03:36 PM »
0
Ragnaros is nice because you get immediate value out of him, silencing him does almost nothing, and he has a solid vanilla value.

I can't really think of a downside to Ragnaros. Even if he gets big game huntered, you still dealt a minimum of 8 damage to something.

Of course Ragnaros has immediate value, I'm saying that there are several other legendaries that go into just as many decks as Rag though, so its no use to rush into Rag if one of those other ones would suit your deck better.
The user formerly known as Easty.

Offline Master KChief

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6963
  • Greatness, at any cost.
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • GameStop
Re: Hearthstone
« Reply #303 on: August 29, 2014, 02:20:09 PM »
+1
Bloodmage Thalnos before any of those honestly.
"If it weren't for people with bad decision making skills, I'd have to get a real job." - Reynad

Lamborghini_diablo

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Hearthstone
« Reply #304 on: August 29, 2014, 02:23:52 PM »
0
Really? I have yet to see him make as large of an impact in games as other legendaries.

Offline Drrek

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2244
  • The Bee of the Sea
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Hearthstone
« Reply #305 on: August 29, 2014, 02:51:21 PM »
0
Really? I have yet to see him make as large of an impact in games as other legendaries.

Its not that he makes a large impact, its that he always is useful.
The user formerly known as Easty.

Offline Master KChief

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6963
  • Greatness, at any cost.
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • GameStop
Re: Hearthstone
« Reply #306 on: August 29, 2014, 03:15:51 PM »
0
What Drrek said, all around utility. If you're going to craft a Legendary with no other variables to consider then you might as well craft one that can end up in a large amount of decks, both now and in the future. Thalnos' cost, cantrip, and spellpower lends itself to a lot of decks.

But really, the Legendary you need to craft the most should always be the one you need at this exact moment. There is no rush to craft a Legendary blind now, save your dust and just wait until that need arrives.
"If it weren't for people with bad decision making skills, I'd have to get a real job." - Reynad

Warrior_Monk

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Hearthstone
« Reply #307 on: August 30, 2014, 12:01:02 AM »
0
But really, the Legendary you need to craft the most should always be the one you need at this exact moment. There is no rush to craft a Legendary blind now, save your dust and just wait until that need arrives.
That's my idea. The only legendary I've crafted has been Leeroy, my first legendary, and it opened up the doors to play a bunch of aggro decks.  I've crafted a few epics like Avenging Wrath and every now and then a rare, but for the most part, I'm saving up for when I need.  Heavily considered a Thalnos though.

Offline Lawfuldog

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2266
  • Hearthstone Semi-Pro
    • -
    • South Central Region
Re: Hearthstone
« Reply #308 on: August 31, 2014, 10:53:09 PM »
+2
There is nothing quite as satisfying as trying to climb to Legendary before reset, getting paired against Reynad, and then beating him.

If only he was streaming so I could hear the salt.
Booster Draft king once upon a time.

Offline Master KChief

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6963
  • Greatness, at any cost.
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • GameStop
Re: Hearthstone
« Reply #309 on: September 03, 2014, 05:07:23 PM »
+2
Ahoy ye mateys! September card back revealed!

"If it weren't for people with bad decision making skills, I'd have to get a real job." - Reynad

browarod

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Hearthstone
« Reply #310 on: September 04, 2014, 04:35:21 PM »
0
I actually really like that card back. I just wish there were more places you could see your own card back than just your deck during matches.

Warrior_Monk

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Hearthstone
« Reply #311 on: September 05, 2014, 03:49:23 AM »
0
I just watched reckful play Murloc Priest to 5-0 at rank 5. wat.

Warrior_Monk

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Hearthstone
« Reply #312 on: September 08, 2014, 01:31:40 AM »
0
Just lost to Kripp because I had Soulfire'd a Doomguard at 25% chance in the zoo mirror.

Although to be fair, he had to Doomguard a Doomguard.  The main thing was he had a Leeroy too, and I couldn't find my other Doomguard.

Just got ANOTHER Malygos.  Good news is I'm at 2900 dust now.  I'm thinking I'll do Cairne and Sylvanas once I hit the 3200 mark.  Harrison, Thalnos, and Ragnaros are up there, but the first two are really all I need for a solid Priest and Paladin control deck (although I am missing 2 Cabals, but that's doable).  I'm kind of just plugging away right now until I get some more epics, since I need 2 Preps before I can do Miracle, 2 Cabals for Priest, Doomhammer and Lightning Storms for Shaman, etc.

Handlock and Warrior are far, far off in the future (although realistically with Cairne and Sylvanas I can build Kolento's Warrior)
« Last Edit: September 08, 2014, 01:40:26 PM by Westy »

Offline Drrek

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2244
  • The Bee of the Sea
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Hearthstone
« Reply #313 on: September 09, 2014, 11:38:03 AM »
0
This is probably the highest card quality I've ever had in an arena (shame its on the Asia server, but I couldn't start another arena on NA while it was under maintenance)



I'll finish the run after class, but I'm thinking this is quite the strong deck.
The user formerly known as Easty.

Offline Drrek

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2244
  • The Bee of the Sea
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Hearthstone
« Reply #314 on: September 11, 2014, 09:51:30 PM »
0
Hey I doubt anyone cares, but I got a webcam and about 700 gold, so I'll be streaming arenas at twitch.tv/drrek0 tomorrow starting around 10 am.


Also did anyone else see the rumors that buzzard and Leeroy nerfs are imminent?
The user formerly known as Easty.

TheMarti

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Hearthstone
« Reply #315 on: September 11, 2014, 10:25:46 PM »
0
Isn't a rumor: Blue post. http://us.battle.net/hearthstone/en/forum/topic/14279128810#1

My thoughts? Buzzard is going to totally stink now, and Leeroy's still going to be pretty good, even with the one extra mana cost. Hopefully it will shush miracle rogues and handlocks.
« Last Edit: September 11, 2014, 10:27:47 PM by The Marti »

browarod

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Hearthstone
« Reply #316 on: September 11, 2014, 11:15:59 PM »
0
Even at 3/2 Buzzard is still vulnerable to the plethora of 2-damage spells and battlecries AND it now costs 3 more? I don't think I'll even run it in my Hunter deck anymore.

Offline Drrek

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2244
  • The Bee of the Sea
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Hearthstone
« Reply #317 on: September 11, 2014, 11:27:22 PM »
0
Isn't a rumor: Blue post. http://us.battle.net/hearthstone/en/forum/topic/14279128810#1

My thoughts? Buzzard is going to totally stink now, and Leeroy's still going to be pretty good, even with the one extra mana cost. Hopefully it will shush miracle rogues and handlocks.

It was a rumor earlier today, I hadn't heard that it had been confirmed yet.
The user formerly known as Easty.

Warrior_Monk

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Hearthstone
« Reply #318 on: September 12, 2014, 01:32:31 AM »
0
I heard that rumor the other day as well. Not at all a fan of it, the stats on Buzzard are completely irrelevant, but changing UtH to 3 cost was what Buzzard needed to prevent absurdly early draw power. I could understand forcing it on turn 6 or 7, but 5 mana is way too much.  Granted, Hunter already has very nice draw power in Flare and Tracking, Buzzard/UtH is the heart and soul of it. It's not even like Hunter was dominating legendary.  I think they'll change it around in the end, similar to UtH balancing initially.

Leeroy I'm moderately okay with.  I would have preferred a 5/3 or something still at 4 mana, but whatever, it really won't effect any of my current decks in a large way, but I really don't think it was necessary.

Hopefully it will shush miracle rogues and handlocks.
Handlock isn't great in the current meta, but I guess with Hunter out of the way it could dominate. Loatheb has done wonders to decrease Miracle Rogue's dominance already as well.  I really don't think the Leeroy change was necessary.  Force of Nature/Savage Roar does plenty of damage in one swing and they aren't nerfing that.

/rant

#sucksforthosewhojustcraftedLeeroy

Offline Master KChief

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6963
  • Greatness, at any cost.
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • GameStop
Re: Hearthstone
« Reply #319 on: September 12, 2014, 06:02:45 AM »
0
Blizzard has made it widely known they carefully watch and nerf any card showing up in most top decks. This does not surprise me about Leeroy in the slightest. I can see the Buzzard nerf being a little over the top and possibly running the same route as the UtH nerf/buff/nerf.

Also it doesn't suck for the people that just crafted Leeroy, since you get the full value of the card back whenever that card is changed.
"If it weren't for people with bad decision making skills, I'd have to get a real job." - Reynad

browarod

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Hearthstone
« Reply #320 on: September 15, 2014, 08:12:54 PM »
0


This is my latest project. It's more of a fun deck due to how gimmicky it is, but I seem to surprise a lot of people in Casual, and even low levels of Ranked (when I'm ranking up for the card back).

I was thinking to add a second Ancestral Spirit, and I think Cairne Bloodhoof would be a good add (he was my very first legendary from a pack). Any thoughts/ideas/suggestions?

Offline Master KChief

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6963
  • Greatness, at any cost.
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • GameStop
Re: Hearthstone
« Reply #321 on: September 15, 2014, 09:00:56 PM »
0
Shaman will be incredibly good after Hunter rotates out of the meta, so definitely stick with it. You can try to find room to work in a Loatheb at least by starting with cutting a Bloodlust or two.
"If it weren't for people with bad decision making skills, I'd have to get a real job." - Reynad

browarod

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Hearthstone
« Reply #322 on: September 16, 2014, 10:07:35 AM »
0
So if I cut Bloodlust x2 to add Loatheb and Cairne, would that work? Or should a second AS go in before Cairne? I just think his deathrattle synergy is too good to pass up in this deck.

Warrior_Monk

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Hearthstone
« Reply #323 on: September 16, 2014, 11:52:45 AM »
0
Cairne.

Offline Drrek

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2244
  • The Bee of the Sea
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Hearthstone
« Reply #324 on: September 16, 2014, 12:29:23 PM »
0
Cairne is more consistent.  If you were running crusher shaman, AS would be required, but this is deathrattle shaman.
The user formerly known as Easty.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal