Check out our Event Calendar! View birthdays, holidays and upcoming tournaments!
fairly often, the game did not do what I told it to, resulting in a loss.
However, as technology progresses, this problem will disappear.
if you really wanted to act like you're throwing a football, the simple answer would be...why not just go outside and throw a football?
shooters are probably the epitome of motion control technology (still a die-hard time crisis fan to this day). fighting games...not so sure. dragonball for the wii has it implemented, and its not exactly the hottest game. i mean really, video games partly exist for us to do things we cant normally do in real life. but now, do we really want to do every single punch/kick/slash/backflip for a fighting game? i dont think many people have the stamina for that (especially considering a typical gamers physique).
Quote from: Lamborghini_diablo on January 07, 2010, 12:02:49 PMfairly often, the game did not do what I told it to, resulting in a loss.Quote from: Prof Underwood on January 07, 2010, 11:58:12 AMHowever, as technology progresses, this problem will disappear.Quote from: Master KChief on January 07, 2010, 04:36:38 PMif you really wanted to act like you're throwing a football, the simple answer would be...why not just go outside and throw a football?Sure, I can go outside and throw a football. But I can't throw a touchdown pass to Reggie Wayne to win the Super Bowl. Depending on the availability of my friends, I might not be able to throw the football to anyone but a wall. I think there's a clear difference here.And if you want to know the future of gaming. Madden '20 is going to be a football helmet that you actually put on. The visor will be the screen and whichever way you turn your head will control what you see on the field. The speakers will be right next to you ears and you'll hear the roar of the stadium. Your movement's will control you actions, and you'll actually feel like you ARE playing in the superbowl
No matter how shiny you make a game, if the game is still bad it won't get played. Inversely if a game has bad graphics but is still a good game it WILL get played. Go figure.
i wont argue its a great system for the simple-minded
the wii just isnt a platform i can take seriously. i wont argue its a great system for the simple-minded, but it just has far too many shortcomings for a serious gamer like me.
Quote from: Master KChief on January 10, 2010, 01:56:12 PMi wont argue its a great system for the simple-mindedSays the guy who can't get over graphics(The art of making something Shiny)
i like to have my cake and eat it, too.
...little-known but true fact, i do enjoy some cooking mama from time to time.
Quote from: TheKarazyvicePresidentRR on January 10, 2010, 02:11:39 PMQuote from: Master KChief on January 10, 2010, 01:56:12 PMi wont argue its a great system for the simple-mindedSays the guy who can't get over graphics(The art of making something Shiny)if that's the definition of graphics, then my Grapes of Wrath has better graphics then any 360...
Quote from: Master KChief on January 10, 2010, 01:56:12 PMthe wii just isnt a platform i can take seriously. i wont argue its a great system for the simple-minded, but it just has far too many shortcomings for a serious gamer like me.If you derive so much of your identity from being a "serious gamer" then have at it. I prefer having fun to setting up personae based on video games.
I like motion control for things like shooters and fighters. You can't go out in real life and shoot up some Nazis, or don a three-hundred-pound Zwiehander and smack Yoda around. Yes, my second comment was in reference to Soul Caliber. Yes, I know Soul Caliber does not have motion sensors. But I can't wait to be able to actually wield a sword in a fighting game, once the technology catches up to where that would make a good game.