« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Sitelock Back???  (Read 3373 times)

Offline adotson85

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 926
    • -
    • East Central Region
Sitelock Back???
« on: October 04, 2011, 01:59:00 AM »
0
I was messing around with some ideas and decided to revisit sitelock on defense. I paired it with a Judges offense and threw in a little anti-meta fun. Here is a rough draft:

Sites
CP x2
NT silver sites x10

Forts
Kingdoms of the World
Assyrian Camp
Philly Outpost

Curses
CwD x2
RBD
Captured Ark

Pale Green Evil Characters
Assyrian Siege Army x4
Assyrian Survivor x3
Assyrian Archers x3

Pale Green Evil Enhancements
Confusion x4
DoU x4

Black Evil Characters
Goliath x2
Garrison x2
Philly Armor Bearer x3
Philly Priests
12 FG

Black Evil Enhancements
Land Dispute x4
Bringing Fear x4

I think this could do really well. ASA to get rid of access sites, artifacts and forts, confusion to pick out site access, DoU to shuffle straggling souls and as a battle winner, Goliath to send access heroes packing, land dispute to take sites and CwD to negate heroes with access. Anyone have any thoughts or ideas if this would be viable or any suggestions to make it better?

« Last Edit: October 04, 2011, 02:02:26 AM by adotson85 »
Logged
"Don't forget in the darkness what you have learned in the light."

Offline Carl deuty

  • Trade Count: (+19)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 414
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: Sitelock Back???
« Reply #1 on: October 04, 2011, 06:21:35 AM »
0
it won't be viable cause i will dominate this deck
Logged

Offline BubbleBoy

  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8014
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Sitelock Back???
« Reply #2 on: October 04, 2011, 07:53:33 AM »
0
Doesn't look half bad to me. Best part is most won't be prepared for it.
Logged
Use the Mad Bomber to rescue his Province.

Offline adotson85

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 926
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: Sitelock Back???
« Reply #3 on: October 04, 2011, 02:52:09 PM »
+1
Quote from: Carl deuty on October 04, 2011, 06:21:35 AM
it won't be viable cause i will dominate this deck

Only thing I've ever seen you dominate is cheese dip!  ;)
Logged
"Don't forget in the darkness what you have learned in the light."

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Sitelock Back???
« Reply #4 on: October 04, 2011, 02:54:19 PM »
0
I don't know about T2, but I'm unsure if silver sites are the best idea.
Logged
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

Offline adotson85

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 926
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: Sitelock Back???
« Reply #5 on: October 04, 2011, 02:56:59 PM »
0
Quote from: SomeKittens on October 04, 2011, 02:54:19 PM
I don't know about T2, but I'm unsure if silver sites are the best idea.

What is your logic behind that? Silver is rarely used in T2, making the chance of facing a silver offense very slim.
Logged
"Don't forget in the darkness what you have learned in the light."

Offline soul seeker

  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3011
  • I find your lack of faith disturbing.
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Sitelock Back???
« Reply #6 on: October 04, 2011, 02:58:44 PM »
0
Thought to ponder on:  DoU would give their sites back that you manage to steal.  Also, Nazzys and CPs may mess up your plans as well.  Silver Sites combined with CwD may not be a bad combination to protect from TSAs.
Logged
noob with a medal

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Sitelock Back???
« Reply #7 on: October 04, 2011, 03:06:41 PM »
0
Quote from: adotson85 on October 04, 2011, 02:56:59 PM
Quote from: SomeKittens on October 04, 2011, 02:54:19 PM
I don't know about T2, but I'm unsure if silver sites are the best idea.

What is your logic behind that? Silver is rarely used in T2, making the chance of facing a silver offense very slim.
I hung around some T2 players at Nats, and their main complaint was TSA
Logged
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

Offline adotson85

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 926
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: Sitelock Back???
« Reply #8 on: October 04, 2011, 03:08:07 PM »
0
Quote from: soul seeker on October 04, 2011, 02:58:44 PM
Thought to ponder on:  DoU would give their sites back that you manage to steal.  Also, Nazzys and CPs may mess up your plans as well.  Silver Sites combined with CwD may not be a bad combination to protect from TSAs.

It will be rare that I have a soul in one of their sites that I take, so that is not too big of a concern. ASA can discard CP, but doubt I will run into it too much. Also, as SS said, CwD will take care of TSA as will the Phillies.
« Last Edit: October 04, 2011, 03:11:26 PM by adotson85 »
Logged
"Don't forget in the darkness what you have learned in the light."

Offline Professoralstad

  • Tournament Host, Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+47)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10841
  • Everything is Awesome!
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Sitelock Back???
« Reply #9 on: October 04, 2011, 03:26:59 PM »
0
Quote from: adotson85 on October 04, 2011, 02:56:59 PM
What is your logic behind that? Silver is rarely used in T2, making the chance of facing a silver offense very slim.

A mono-Silver offense was one small move away from taking 1st at Nationals. Of course, the reasoning was that most of us thought the same thing, that Silver wouldn't be played, and no one expected it.

Most T2 decks will have some silver. Judges and Sam/Royalty will have the Judges Angels, Isaiah will have his associates, lots of decks will still splash TSA/Captain (all these years and they're still bomb-diggity) and even the older strats, like TGT and Disciples, often use Gabriel and old Cherubim respectively. Not only that, but Canaanites with a light Philly splash will be popular, which means that you might run into decks with Sodoms (which can be recurred and protected with Fortify Site) as well as Land Disputes.

I'm not saying it won't work, and against some decks, it most likely will. But I could see an Isaiah deck doing well against the deck, especially if they have a way to beat Goliath.
Logged
Press 1 for more options.

Offline Captain Kirk

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+29)
  • *****
  • Posts: 3835
  • Combo? Yes please.
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: Sitelock Back???
« Reply #10 on: October 04, 2011, 03:58:32 PM »
0
Quote from: adotson85 on October 04, 2011, 03:08:07 PM
Quote from: soul seeker on October 04, 2011, 02:58:44 PM
Thought to ponder on:  DoU would give their sites back that you manage to steal.  Also, Nazzys and CPs may mess up your plans as well.  Silver Sites combined with CwD may not be a bad combination to protect from TSAs.

It will be rare that I have a soul in one of their sites that I take, so that is not too big of a concern. ASA can discard CP, but doubt I will run into it too much. Also, as SS said, CwD will take care of TSA as will the Phillies.

But if your opponent gets two copies of CP down, you can't discard it with ASA. I've seen at least 4 opponents use CP this season already.

Kirk
Logged
Friends don't let friends play T1 multi.

Offline adotson85

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 926
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: Sitelock Back???
« Reply #11 on: October 04, 2011, 05:18:16 PM »
0
Quote from: Captain Kirk on October 04, 2011, 03:58:32 PM
Quote from: adotson85 on October 04, 2011, 03:08:07 PM
Quote from: soul seeker on October 04, 2011, 02:58:44 PM
Thought to ponder on:  DoU would give their sites back that you manage to steal.  Also, Nazzys and CPs may mess up your plans as well.  Silver Sites combined with CwD may not be a bad combination to protect from TSAs.

It will be rare that I have a soul in one of their sites that I take, so that is not too big of a concern. ASA can discard CP, but doubt I will run into it too much. Also, as SS said, CwD will take care of TSA as will the Phillies.

But if your opponent gets two copies of CP down, you can't discard it with ASA. I've seen at least 4 opponents use CP this season already.

Kirk

I am using Judges on offense. So i can use the silver angel who negates sites to bring in a judge who can play sword against sword to bring in my ASA. Should I use a different color for the sites? Prefer NT so CP can protect them.

Logged
"Don't forget in the darkness what you have learned in the light."

Offline BubbleBoy

  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8014
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Sitelock Back???
« Reply #12 on: October 04, 2011, 05:41:58 PM »
0
You'll probably see every brigade this year. I'd go with multiple brigades of sites if I were you. Chorazin lets you activate one of your many important curses for a turn, so that's a nice add. The rest of the NT sites don't do much for you, but neither do the silver sites (at least one of which you'll want to keep anyway).
Logged
Use the Mad Bomber to rescue his Province.

Offline Carl deuty

  • Trade Count: (+19)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 414
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: Sitelock Back???
« Reply #13 on: October 05, 2011, 06:43:32 AM »
0
I shall predict that teal will be the least used brigade this season, especially in type 2.
Logged

Offline Red Dragon Thorn

  • Covenant Games
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5373
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Covenant Games
Re: Sitelock Back???
« Reply #14 on: October 05, 2011, 08:48:17 AM »
0
Heh. I'm not sure if thats going to be an accurate statement or not, but even it it was, the problem with teal sites, is that you can only have 6 in a T2deck. (Since there's only 3, and all of them have an SA.)
Logged
www.covenantgames.com

Offline adotson85

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 926
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: Sitelock Back???
« Reply #15 on: October 05, 2011, 12:39:58 PM »
0
Quote from: Red Dragon Thorn on October 05, 2011, 08:48:17 AM
Heh. I'm not sure if thats going to be an accurate statement or not, but even it it was, the problem with teal sites, is that you can only have 6 in a T2deck. (Since there's only 3, and all of them have an SA.)

And none of the teal sites are NT.
Logged
"Don't forget in the darkness what you have learned in the light."

Offline RTSmaniac

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • *****
  • Posts: 4289
    • LFG
    • Southeast Region
    • ROOT Online
Re: Sitelock Back???
« Reply #16 on: October 06, 2011, 10:37:20 PM »
0
Quote from: soul seeker on October 04, 2011, 02:58:44 PM
Thought to ponder on:  DoU would give their sites back that you manage to steal.  Also, Nazzys and CPs may mess up your plans as well.  Silver Sites combined with CwD may not be a bad combination to protect from TSAs.

As long as you dont place thier sites in your Land of Bondage then the shuffle effect wont target them...

Death of Unrighteous (Pa)
Type: Evil Enh. • Brigade: Pale Green • Ability: None • Class: None • Special Ability: Shuffle all Lost Souls and sites in holder's Land of Bondage into owner's draw pile. Discard all Evil Characters in battle. • Play As: Shuffle [return] all Lost Souls, sites, and evil cards in sites in your Land of Bondage into your deck. Discard all Evil Characters in battle. • Identifiers: None • Verse: Genesis 7:23 • Availability: Patriarchs booster packs (Rare)

Good Job on the lockout! Looks pretty good.
Logged
This is the way Lackey gave it to me. All hail the power of Lackey!
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
 
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal