« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: banding defence?  (Read 7213 times)

Offline Irish_Luck

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 225
  • Good Luck
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: banding defence?
« Reply #25 on: May 09, 2011, 02:05:22 AM »
0
Quote from: lp670sv on May 09, 2011, 12:07:28 AM
Quote from: Irish_Luck on May 09, 2011, 12:04:37 AM
Also I would recommend having a Darius Decree to prevent someone from using ET to AOC on you. The only real problems I have found with demons are that there are no protect fortresses and three nails. Having Wandering Spirit in battle is as good as good as, if not better than, having a protect fortress. Golgatha, Destruction, and Seven Sons are good to have in your deck to stop three nails right away because it can easily destroy your deck if you can't get rid of it.

yeah Three Nails was one heck of a problem in Teams on Friday, thanks for building a deck that was decimated by one card :P

The problem was that I don't know how to use demons for a teams deck. I now know both decks need more counters for that artifact or have one defense be mostly humans. If I was able to test it out a couple of times I probably would have realized that.
Logged
Go Dolphins!

lp670sv

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: banding defence?
« Reply #26 on: May 09, 2011, 02:07:19 AM »
0
Quote from: Irish_Luck on May 09, 2011, 02:05:22 AM
Quote from: lp670sv on May 09, 2011, 12:07:28 AM
Quote from: Irish_Luck on May 09, 2011, 12:04:37 AM
Also I would recommend having a Darius Decree to prevent someone from using ET to AOC on you. The only real problems I have found with demons are that there are no protect fortresses and three nails. Having Wandering Spirit in battle is as good as good as, if not better than, having a protect fortress. Golgatha, Destruction, and Seven Sons are good to have in your deck to stop three nails right away because it can easily destroy your deck if you can't get rid of it.

yeah Three Nails was one heck of a problem in Teams on Friday, thanks for building a deck that was decimated by one card :P

The problem was that I don't know how to use demons for a teams deck. I now know both decks need more counters for that artifact or have one defense be mostly humans. If I was able to test it out a couple of times I probably would have realized that.

excuses, excuses...
Logged

Offline Townsend

  • Trade Count: (+28)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 630
  • Official member of "The Van"
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: banding defence?
« Reply #27 on: May 09, 2011, 07:01:39 AM »
0
Quote from: lp670sv on May 09, 2011, 12:07:28 AM
Golgatha, Destruction, and Seven Sons are good to have in your deck to stop three nails right away because it can easily destroy your deck if you can't get rid of it.
You forgot captured ark, that would be also great to get rid of three nails.
Logged

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: banding defence?
« Reply #28 on: May 09, 2011, 11:23:56 AM »
0
Nobody techs against demons, so somehow you're safe.
Logged
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

Rawrlolsauce!

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: banding defence?
« Reply #29 on: May 09, 2011, 11:26:23 AM »
+1
If you band Wandering Spirit to Spirit of Temptation to Gomer to the generic Sadducee you'll have a CBN band that's 13 on defense. The biggest character is 12 and your band can't be negated so you'll win, kthx.
Logged

Offline cookie monster

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 560
  • cookies! Nom Nom Nom
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: banding defence?
« Reply #30 on: May 09, 2011, 05:28:13 PM »
0
what is the biggest banding chain that can work without some of its ECs? that has a negate EC in it.
Logged
Yo dog, sup in da hood! Cookie monsta is in da house.

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: banding defence?
« Reply #31 on: May 09, 2011, 05:39:25 PM »
0
BBTN:
WS - SoT - Gomer/King Mannassah (with GoJ) - KoT
Logged
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: banding defence?
« Reply #32 on: May 09, 2011, 08:13:36 PM »
+1
That's the canon CBNBTN Evil band.
Logged
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: banding defence?
« Reply #33 on: May 29, 2011, 10:22:34 PM »
+1
Three Nails is useless this season, thanks to Golgatha.
Logged
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

Offline Alex_Olijar

  • 16plus
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • *
  • Posts: 8124
  • This guy is my mascot
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: banding defence?
« Reply #34 on: May 29, 2011, 10:24:05 PM »
0
Quote from: SomeKittens on May 29, 2011, 10:22:34 PM
Three Nails is useless this season, thanks to Golgatha.

Three Nails is useless for virtually every season, thanks to the general lack of sole demon defenses and relative strength of other artifact possabilities.
Logged

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: banding defence?
« Reply #35 on: May 29, 2011, 10:54:07 PM »
0
Ok, more useless.  The only time I've ever run it was as a prank.
Logged
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

Offline Alex_Olijar

  • 16plus
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • *
  • Posts: 8124
  • This guy is my mascot
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: banding defence?
« Reply #36 on: May 29, 2011, 10:56:12 PM »
0
I ran it in multi last Nats due to the Gates of Hell stall decks I knew were there.
Logged

Offline Red Dragon Thorn

  • Covenant Games
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5373
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Covenant Games
Re: banding defence?
« Reply #37 on: May 30, 2011, 09:38:36 PM »
0
I ran it in my TGT deck last year - Because it covered a weak spot - the deck was primarily conversion based to counter Philistines - so Three Nails covered the lack of true demon killers.
Logged
www.covenantgames.com
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
« previous next »
 
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal