Author Topic: My first attempt at white women / gray pharisees deck.  (Read 1912 times)

Offline uthminister [BR]

  • Youth Minister
  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+19)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2582
  • Jesus Loves Gamers!
    • -
    • South Central Region
My first attempt at white women / gray pharisees deck.
« on: June 11, 2011, 07:43:45 PM »
0
Cards: 56

Souls: 8
Hopper
Site Grabber
Shuffler
Deck Discarder
N.T. Only
Three Liner
Revealer
Site Emptier

Forts: 2
Solomon's Temple
The Garden Tomb

Sites: 3
Chorazin
Caesarea Philippi
Nazareth

Arts: 1
Book of the Covenant

Covs: 3
The New Covenant
I Am Truth
I Am Love

Curs: 1
Besieged

Evil Doms: 4
Burial
Falling Away
Christian Martyr
Destruction of Nehushtan

Good Doms: 6
Angel of the Lord
Guardian of Your Souls
Glory of the Lord
Harvest Time
New Jerusalem
Son of God

Good Chars: 6
Mary, the Mother of James
Mary Magdalene
Jairus' Daughter
Salome
Susanna
Joanna

Good Enhs: 10
Resurrection
Magnificat
Benedictus
A Child is Born
"He Is Risen"
No Need for Spices
Passover Hymn
Words of Encouragment
Consider the Lilies
Burning Bush

Evil Chars: 6
Pharisees
Pharisees
Pharisees
The Entrapping Pharisee
Hard-Hearted Religious Leaders
Proud Pharisee

Evil Enhs: 6
Water Shaft
Just a Hireling
Balaam's Disobedience
Tenants Kill the Son
Pretension
Self-Righteous Prayer

Comments...Questions...Rude Remarks?

Offline Smokey

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3216
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: My first attempt at white women / gray pharisees deck.
« Reply #1 on: June 11, 2011, 07:50:26 PM »
0
With a defense that small you don't need any of the sites baring nazereth if you feel compelled to use it.

Water shaft is pretty bad.
Besieged seems meh.

you have too few heroes and too many good enhancements especially if you want to use the double cov combo, which I also don't reccomend since its 5 cards that could be put to better use.

Offline Nameless

  • Trade Count: (+39)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1914
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • THIS IS AWESOME!
Re: My first attempt at white women / gray pharisees deck.
« Reply #2 on: June 11, 2011, 07:52:15 PM »
+1
add a Lydia

Offline Alex_Olijar

  • 16plus
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • *
  • Posts: 8124
  • This guy is my mascot
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: My first attempt at white women / gray pharisees deck.
« Reply #3 on: June 11, 2011, 07:57:26 PM »
+2
Needs more Faith in our High Priest.

Offline uthminister [BR]

  • Youth Minister
  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+19)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2582
  • Jesus Loves Gamers!
    • -
    • South Central Region
Re: My first attempt at white women / gray pharisees deck.
« Reply #4 on: June 11, 2011, 08:03:43 PM »
0
I took out Lydia because her ability was useless, but she could be added for Susanna. Faith in our High Priest is an interesting add.

Offline Red Dragon Thorn

  • Covenant Games
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5373
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Covenant Games
Re: My first attempt at white women / gray pharisees deck.
« Reply #5 on: June 11, 2011, 08:13:58 PM »
+1
Q_Q Protection from capture and access to AoCP is useless, but a character who can be killed once, but then loses initiative isn't?

Besides that here's what I think.

If you're going to play a temple, you may as well be using Herod's - You've got enough enhancements that you can probably afford to chuck one.

Lay Down your Life > Resurrection. Preventative measures are better than reactive ones.

You seem to have a few more Good enhancements than characters, I'd try to even out that ratio a bit, I'd cut Burning Bush and Benedictus for Asaph and Lydia. I just don't like Burning Bush in general, and since you're not super reliant on TGT, you shouldn't need benedictus either - Lydia for protection from capture, and optional AoC splash, and Asaph for Magnificat CBN even though he doesn't quite fit the theme.
« Last Edit: June 11, 2011, 08:18:55 PM by Red Dragon Thorn »
www.covenantgames.com

Warrior_Monk

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: My first attempt at white women / gray pharisees deck.
« Reply #6 on: June 11, 2011, 09:13:59 PM »
0
I am Love and I am Truth don't work together for CBN recursion of No Need For Spices, in case you thought it was. One says ignore, the other says ignores. I'm not sure which is which, but that's three slots cleared up.

Offline uthminister [BR]

  • Youth Minister
  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+19)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2582
  • Jesus Loves Gamers!
    • -
    • South Central Region
Re: My first attempt at white women / gray pharisees deck.
« Reply #7 on: June 13, 2011, 11:22:54 AM »
0
So I can't recur a card that ignores...seriously?

Offline Nameless

  • Trade Count: (+39)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1914
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • THIS IS AWESOME!
Re: My first attempt at white women / gray pharisees deck.
« Reply #8 on: June 13, 2011, 11:24:04 AM »
0
 +1 Why couldn't you ?

Offline Professoralstad

  • Tournament Host, Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+47)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10841
  • Everything is Awesome!
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: My first attempt at white women / gray pharisees deck.
« Reply #9 on: June 13, 2011, 11:32:00 AM »
0
So I can't recur a card that ignores...seriously?

Seriously. It's the same principle that says you can't play an enhancement that says "placed" with High Places...One of the unfortunate realities of playing cards as they were written, not as they should be written.
Press 1 for more options.

Offline Red

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • *****
  • Posts: 4791
  • It takes time to build the boat.
    • LFG
    • Southeast Region
Re: My first attempt at white women / gray pharisees deck.
« Reply #10 on: June 13, 2011, 01:01:51 PM »
0
And the most foolish way to rule said situation. All cards with old/bad wording need play as. AKA all cards effected by that ruling.
Ironman 2016 and 2018 Winner.
3rd T1-2P 2018, 3rd T2-2P 2019
I survived the Flood twice.

Offline Smokey

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3216
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: My first attempt at white women / gray pharisees deck.
« Reply #11 on: June 13, 2011, 03:11:23 PM »
0
And the most foolish way to rule said situation. All cards with old/bad wording need play as. AKA all cards effected by that ruling.

Changing wording would be eratta and that's much more difficult since rob needs to approve it.

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: My first attempt at white women / gray pharisees deck.
« Reply #12 on: June 13, 2011, 04:00:05 PM »
0
I'm surprised this hasn't been brought up yet...Uthminister is playing with only 56 cards?
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal