Welcome to the Official Redemption® Message Board!
Why King Ahab?
Mustering for War would not be in this deck if it wasn't in the Nats winning deck. I like it.
Stronghold in the Desert? Really? Really? Take it out.
David's Triumph>Centurian's Proc.
Heldai>Helez
Unified Kingdom is good too.
Quote from: Ring Wraith on August 15, 2011, 12:31:54 AMWhy King Ahab?Why not?? He negates stuff?? He's big??An evil character that King Amaziah can actually win a battle against would be nice.QuoteMustering for War would not be in this deck if it wasn't in the Nats winning deck. I like it.Mustering for War wouldn't be in here if red wasn't as slow as a slug.4 Dolla Holla FTW.QuoteStronghold in the Desert? Really? Really? Take it out.I think you haven't read the ability recently. It's a troll with TGT.Not with monobrigades running around. I guess it's okay with territory destruction...but it's deck discard. Meh.QuoteDavid's Triumph>Centurian's Proc.David's Triumph targets a male, Centurion targets a human.David's Triumph is also CBN against Phillies and is 7/0, not to mention there's only 3 females that will ever see play.
I still think you should replace John with Thomas and add Valley of Salt... ITB, discard X ECs, CBN on two heroes? Yes please.
Honestly I would take out stronghold... too many times have I discarded a lost soul.
If you really like Ahab you should probably play with Gib Trick.