Cactus Web Site special offer: Orders over $75 will receive a free Angel of God 2023 National Promo card while supplies last.
Why King Ahab?
Mustering for War would not be in this deck if it wasn't in the Nats winning deck. I like it.
Stronghold in the Desert? Really? Really? Take it out.
David's Triumph>Centurian's Proc.
Heldai>Helez
Unified Kingdom is good too.
Quote from: Ring Wraith on August 15, 2011, 12:31:54 AMWhy King Ahab?Why not?? He negates stuff?? He's big??An evil character that King Amaziah can actually win a battle against would be nice.QuoteMustering for War would not be in this deck if it wasn't in the Nats winning deck. I like it.Mustering for War wouldn't be in here if red wasn't as slow as a slug.4 Dolla Holla FTW.QuoteStronghold in the Desert? Really? Really? Take it out.I think you haven't read the ability recently. It's a troll with TGT.Not with monobrigades running around. I guess it's okay with territory destruction...but it's deck discard. Meh.QuoteDavid's Triumph>Centurian's Proc.David's Triumph targets a male, Centurion targets a human.David's Triumph is also CBN against Phillies and is 7/0, not to mention there's only 3 females that will ever see play.
I still think you should replace John with Thomas and add Valley of Salt... ITB, discard X ECs, CBN on two heroes? Yes please.
Honestly I would take out stronghold... too many times have I discarded a lost soul.
If you really like Ahab you should probably play with Gib Trick.