Author Topic: Requesting dumb deck ideas..... (Read 12189 times)

The Warrior · « **Reply #25 on:** May 10, 2010, 06:46:56 PM »

Quote from: Rawrlolsauce! on May 10, 2010, 06:44:59 PM

Except I've been raving about my UNDEFEATED characterless deck for the last year

does that use the transformers? (e.g. Madness)

Rawrlolsauce! · « **Reply #26 on:** May 10, 2010, 06:51:41 PM »

Use Doubt to block opponent's RA, play that orange FOOF enhancement to capture opponent's hero. Opponent then attacks me and plays Cup of Wrath, and choose two of their characters (I control their Ashpanez)

Ashpanez's SA activates and I convert the human I captured to a crimson EC and then use Holy Grail on it.

The Warrior · « **Reply #27 on:** May 10, 2010, 06:55:41 PM »

Quote from: Rawrlolsauce! on May 10, 2010, 06:51:41 PM

Use Doubt to block opponent's RA, play that orange FOOF enhancement to capture opponent's hero. Opponent then attacks me and plays Cup of Wrath, and choose two of their characters (I control their Ashpanez)

Ashpanez's SA activates and I convert the human I captured to a crimson EC and then use Holy Grail on it.

*whistle* why not just add Characters?

Rawrlolsauce! · « **Reply #28 on:** May 10, 2010, 06:59:01 PM »

Then it wouldn't be characterless.

that one kid · « **Reply #29 on:** May 10, 2010, 07:00:32 PM »

What if they don't have Ashphenaz?

Warrior_Monk · « **Reply #30 on:** May 10, 2010, 07:21:33 PM »

Quote from: Rawrlolsauce! on May 10, 2010, 05:56:08 PM

Depending on how you define combos.... sure....

Is SOG + NJ a combo? >:c

Also, by multi color, did you mean
-You can use multi color, but you must have one solo color of everything
-Dual color, but no every color
-Dual and Tri Color, but no every color
-No Dual, Tri, or every color.

drawing combos. two non-character cards with a draw ability. Gifts and Hur would be two. Gifts and Love would be two. Words and Reach would be two. etc.

originally I meant Dual, but no Tri or Multi.

Rawrlolsauce! · « **Reply #31 on:** May 10, 2010, 07:24:58 PM »

Darn. Seeker-Soldier-FSP would be pretty cash.....

I'm still up for the challenge.

fyero · « **Reply #32 on:** June 09, 2010, 02:10:14 PM »

hey i made a competitive red deck it's currently like 9-2 so i would say red can actually work!

Warrior_Monk · « **Reply #33 on:** June 09, 2010, 02:15:43 PM »

Quote from: fyero on June 09, 2010, 02:10:14 PM

hey i made a competitive red deck it's currently like 9-2 so i would say red can actually work!

I could make a characterless deck that has that record. if you can list who it's won against, maybe I'll be impressed.

fyero · « **Reply #34 on:** June 09, 2010, 03:36:48 PM »

well sadly i haven't played it in a tournament - I hav only played it against my dad and brother. we haven't been to many tourneys since my bro placed first in states a couple years ago - we bin busy but we're starting to get back into tourneys

Prof Underwood · « **Reply #35 on:** June 09, 2010, 03:50:53 PM »

Quote from: fyero on June 09, 2010, 02:10:14 PM

hey i made a competitive red deck it's currently like 9-2 so i would say red can actually work!

Red is fun. I have a deck that has won a FL local and placed 2nd at OH state that is completely a Red offense. It is a better brigade than people think. Of course still really not as good as some others, but better than its reputation.

Warrior_Monk · « **Reply #36 on:** June 09, 2010, 04:22:50 PM »

Quote from: Prof Underwood on June 09, 2010, 03:50:53 PM

It is a better brigade than people think. Of course still really not as good as some others, but better than its reputation.

so what's WORSE than Red?

EmJayBee83 · « **Reply #37 on:** June 09, 2010, 05:08:27 PM »

Quote from: Ring Wraith on June 09, 2010, 04:22:50 PM

Quote from: Prof Underwood on June 09, 2010, 03:50:53 PM
It is a better brigade than people think. Of course still really not as good as some others, but better than its reputation.
so what's WORSE than Red?

NT Teal is slightly worse than red, as are FBtN Luke heroes.

fyero · « **Reply #38 on:** June 09, 2010, 05:34:31 PM »

Dare i say blue is worse than red in my belief

Warrior_Monk · « **Reply #39 on:** June 09, 2010, 05:45:00 PM »

Quote from: EmJayBee83 on June 09, 2010, 05:08:27 PM

Quote from: Ring Wraith on June 09, 2010, 04:22:50 PM
Quote from: Prof Underwood on June 09, 2010, 03:50:53 PM
It is a better brigade than people think. Of course still really not as good as some others, but better than its reputation.
so what's WORSE than Red?
NT Teal is slightly worse than red, as are FBtN Luke heroes.

wyn.

fine...what brigade is worse than red?

Quote from: fyero on June 09, 2010, 05:34:31 PM

Dare i say blue is worse than red in my belief

*blink* what? blue IS hand discard, one of the most used (and effective) strategies.

fyero · « **Reply #40 on:** June 09, 2010, 05:57:18 PM »

hmmmm...really? I've never seen a successful blue offense deck but i guess to each his own. idk that's the only brigade that i could think of since green finally got a reason to be played

Warrior_Monk · « **Reply #41 on:** June 09, 2010, 06:22:23 PM »

Quote from: fyero on June 09, 2010, 05:57:18 PM

hmmmm...really? I've never seen a successful blue offense deck but i guess to each his own. idk that's the only brigade that i could think of since green finally got a reason to be played

2008 national winner?

fyero · « **Reply #42 on:** June 09, 2010, 07:14:03 PM »

Quote from: Ring Wraith on June 09, 2010, 06:22:23 PM

Quote from: fyero on June 09, 2010, 05:57:18 PM
hmmmm...really? I've never seen a successful blue offense deck but i guess to each his own. idk that's the only brigade that i could think of since green finally got a reason to be played
2008 national winner?

wow well if it isn't blue then perhaps yellow being the downfall of "what will i do w/o three nails

BubbleBoy · « **Reply #43 on:** June 09, 2010, 07:18:41 PM »

Gold is pretty weak if not combined with black. Maybe weaker than red.

The Warrior · « **Reply #44 on:** June 09, 2010, 07:29:40 PM »

RR is weaker than Red (without smiley interpet as u wish)

Shofarblower · « **Reply #45 on:** June 09, 2010, 07:39:54 PM »

Quote from: BubbleBoy on June 09, 2010, 07:18:41 PM

Gold is pretty weak if not combined with black. Maybe weaker than red.

I just happen to have a Gold/Crimson Deck that Rocks (without 3 Nails even)!

fyero · « **Reply #46 on:** June 09, 2010, 07:48:53 PM »

hhmmmmmm interesting....

BubbleBoy · « **Reply #47 on:** June 09, 2010, 08:06:28 PM »

Quote from: Shofarblower on June 09, 2010, 07:39:54 PM

Quote from: BubbleBoy on June 09, 2010, 07:18:41 PM
Gold is pretty weak if not combined with black. Maybe weaker than red.

I just happen to have a Gold/Crimson Deck that Rocks (without 3 Nails even)!

Yeah, but Crimson is good with anything because it can destroy defenses as well as offenses.

Josh · « **Reply #48 on:** June 09, 2010, 08:38:36 PM »

Quote from: BubbleBoy on June 09, 2010, 08:06:28 PM

Quote from: Shofarblower on June 09, 2010, 07:39:54 PM
Quote from: BubbleBoy on June 09, 2010, 07:18:41 PM
Gold is pretty weak if not combined with black. Maybe weaker than red.

I just happen to have a Gold/Crimson Deck that Rocks (without 3 Nails even)!
Yeah, but Crimson is good with anything because it can destroy defenses as well as offenses.

At least HUMAN defenses. It wouldn't be able to get rid of demons for the Gold offense.

The Warrior · « **Reply #49 on:** June 09, 2010, 08:44:13 PM »

How about a deck based on gender? only depicting Men or women?

News:

Author Topic: Requesting dumb deck ideas..... (Read 12189 times)

Rawrlolsauce!

Rawrlolsauce!

Warrior_Monk

Rawrlolsauce!

Warrior_Monk

Warrior_Monk

Warrior_Monk

Warrior_Monk