Check out our Event Calendar! View birthdays, holidays and upcoming tournaments!
Thought so, just checking. Well, that's disappointing.
Quote from: Ironisaac on July 16, 2017, 05:13:19 PMThought so, just checking. Well, that's disappointing.Can he not be at least shut down by 3woes?
Just want to Clarify, are you referring to the dominant or the person? If it is the person I might have a way
Quote from: Kevinthedude on July 16, 2017, 05:23:56 PMCouple issues with that, first is that Dominants cannot be negated at all, secondly LoR is not an in play location so a card would need to specific it can target cards and abilities in a LoR for it to be able to do so.I think if a card was worded as: "Discard a good card not in battle." then it would work. Currently there is no such card and I don't imagine there ever will be.
Couple issues with that, first is that Dominants cannot be negated at all, secondly LoR is not an in play location so a card would need to specific it can target cards and abilities in a LoR for it to be able to do so.
Quote from: Kevinthedude on July 16, 2017, 05:23:56 PMCouple issues with that, first is that Dominants cannot be negated at all, secondly LoR is not an in play location so a card would need to specific it can target cards and abilities in a LoR for it to be able to do so.I think if a card was worded as: "Discard a good card not in battle." then it would work. Currently there is no such card and I don't imagine there ever will be.Quote from: Jonesy on July 16, 2017, 08:44:29 PMJust want to Clarify, are you referring to the dominant or the person? If it is the person I might have a way
Quote from: Master Q on July 16, 2017, 10:14:59 PMQuote from: Kevinthedude on July 16, 2017, 05:23:56 PMCouple issues with that, first is that Dominants cannot be negated at all, secondly LoR is not an in play location so a card would need to specific it can target cards and abilities in a LoR for it to be able to do so.I think if a card was worded as: "Discard a good card not in battle." then it would work. Currently there is no such card and I don't imagine there ever will be.That is an interesting point but I believe it is incorrect. I very well could be wrong on this but I'm pretty sure to target something in an out of play location, the specific location has to actually be stated. In this case, an ability would have to specify "discard a good card in a Land of Redemption" to be able to target Guardian.
Quote from: Kevinthedude on July 16, 2017, 10:18:02 PMQuote from: Master Q on July 16, 2017, 10:14:59 PMQuote from: Kevinthedude on July 16, 2017, 05:23:56 PMCouple issues with that, first is that Dominants cannot be negated at all, secondly LoR is not an in play location so a card would need to specific it can target cards and abilities in a LoR for it to be able to do so.I think if a card was worded as: "Discard a good card not in battle." then it would work. Currently there is no such card and I don't imagine there ever will be.That is an interesting point but I believe it is incorrect. I very well could be wrong on this but I'm pretty sure to target something in an out of play location, the specific location has to actually be stated. In this case, an ability would have to specify "discard a good card in a Land of Redemption" to be able to target Guardian.Actually it's already been stated that "outside of battle" can include anything outside of play. Lampstand's ruling states that Falling Away cannot take a Redeemed Soul away because LoR is outside of battle.
Can Guardian involve music?
Interesting, so that means The Ends of the Earth can negate Gates of Hell even though it's in set-aside?
Quote from: Kevinthedude on July 16, 2017, 10:37:27 PMInteresting, so that means The Ends of the Earth can negate Gates of Hell even though it's in set-aside?That was one of my intentions. "Mos Def" Fun fact - For the second ability, it originally just said: "If a missionary is in battle, negate an evil or neutral card." Obviously I didn't want it to be able to negate evil cards in battle, so it changed rather quickly to "not in battle".
Quote from: megamanlan on July 16, 2017, 10:30:51 PMQuote from: Kevinthedude on July 16, 2017, 10:18:02 PMQuote from: Master Q on July 16, 2017, 10:14:59 PMQuote from: Kevinthedude on July 16, 2017, 05:23:56 PMCouple issues with that, first is that Dominants cannot be negated at all, secondly LoR is not an in play location so a card would need to specific it can target cards and abilities in a LoR for it to be able to do so.I think if a card was worded as: "Discard a good card not in battle." then it would work. Currently there is no such card and I don't imagine there ever will be.That is an interesting point but I believe it is incorrect. I very well could be wrong on this but I'm pretty sure to target something in an out of play location, the specific location has to actually be stated. In this case, an ability would have to specify "discard a good card in a Land of Redemption" to be able to target Guardian.Actually it's already been stated that "outside of battle" can include anything outside of play. Lampstand's ruling states that Falling Away cannot take a Redeemed Soul away because LoR is outside of battle.Interesting, so that means The Ends of the Earth can negate Gates of Hell even though it's in set-aside?
