Author Topic: Lost Soul Rankings Discussion (Read 6573 times)

Warrior_Monk · « **Reply #25 on:** May 15, 2015, 01:59:14 AM »

Perhaps I shouldn't use such strong language. I just don't want Josiah swaying young and weaker players (like he has The Guardian) to include it in all of their decks.

It's not awful, but it's certainly not Tier 1. Tier 3 at best.

jbeers285 · « **Reply #26 on:** May 15, 2015, 02:23:31 AM »

Quote from: Westy on May 15, 2015, 01:59:14 AM

Perhaps I shouldn't use such strong language. I just don't want Josiah swaying young and weaker players (like he has The Guardian) to include it in all of their decks.

It's not awful, but it's certainly not Tier 1. Tier 3 at best.

What do I have in common with Pixar?

EmJayBee83 · « **Reply #27 on:** May 15, 2015, 07:13:03 AM »

Quote from: Chris on May 14, 2015, 09:10:59 PM

It allows you the opportunity to rescue half of it if your half-rescued Liner somehow ends up in your opponent's LoB (via Nebushasban for instance). This was a much bigger deal before the rule change that disallowed Lost Souls to be rescued from your own territory (and honestly, the strong wording I used in my previous post was a product of my still sort of being in that mindset),

OK. I figured that is what it was, but I just wanted to make sure I wasn;t missing something.

Quote

but I would still play 2-Liners before 3-Liners in 2P categories.

In 2P categories, I would really only care one way or another if I were playing cards that would allow me to move the Souls into an opponent's territory.

Drrek · « **Reply #28 on:** May 15, 2015, 10:07:01 AM »

Quote from: EmJayBee83 on May 15, 2015, 07:13:03 AM

Quote
but I would still play 2-Liners before 3-Liners in 2P categories.
In 2P categories, I would really only care one way or another if I were playing cards that would allow me to move the Souls into an opponent's territory.

Wanderer's a pretty common card for your opponent to play, but its still unlikely to matter. I use a 2-liner, just because I don't actually own a 3-liner (something that has hurt me in Teams before).

EmJayBee83 · « **Reply #29 on:** May 15, 2015, 10:42:25 AM »

Quote from: Drrek on May 15, 2015, 10:07:01 AM

Quote from: EmJayBee83 on May 15, 2015, 07:13:03 AM
Quote
but I would still play 2-Liners before 3-Liners in 2P categories.
In 2P categories, I would really only care one way or another if I were playing cards that would allow me to move the Souls into an opponent's territory.

Wanderer's a pretty common card for your opponent to play, but its still unlikely to matter. I use a 2-liner, just because I don't actually own a 3-liner (something that has hurt me in Teams before).

Yeah--but depending on your opponent to choose move a half-rescued 2-Liner (which is when this really matters) at a time that benefits you is just multiplying improbabilities.

Master Q · « **Reply #30 on:** May 15, 2015, 07:22:01 PM »

I'd say the Hopper, Switch, Revealer, Female, and Resurrection LS are in every offensive/balanced deck I make. I never regret using them, they should all be tier 1, in my experience.

I usually find myself making a deck around the 2 liner, including cards to shuffle and hide souls just for that card, rather than just throwing it in. I don't like using it, or facing it, though it should be tier 1 or 2 at least.

I've never seen the Site Guard played, is it really that great?

The N.T. only is usually a good filler soul nowadays, as most decks have little trouble getting around it.

The TEC LS seems like filler to me. I would put it in as a last resort.

Most decks I make now include some sites, so the Deck and Hand discard ones are usually in them.

The rest I agree with. Good topic.

Cactus Game Design Message Boards

News:

Author Topic: Lost Soul Rankings Discussion (Read 6573 times)

Warrior_Monk

Re: Lost Soul Rankings Discussion

jbeers285

Re: Lost Soul Rankings Discussion

EmJayBee83

Re: Lost Soul Rankings Discussion

Drrek

Re: Lost Soul Rankings Discussion

EmJayBee83

Re: Lost Soul Rankings Discussion

Master Q

Re: Lost Soul Rankings Discussion