Cactus Game Design Message Boards
Redemption® Collectible Trading Card Game HQ => Redemption® Resources and Thinktank => Strategies and Combos => Topic started by: Sean on September 15, 2008, 08:53:34 PM
-
Stone Pillar at Bethel + Asher
I think this is my favorite two card combo now. You pluck a card from your deck and then just retrieve the one you discarded with Asher. Better than drawing because you get the exact card you need at no cost whatsoever. Love it. Love it. Love it.
Sean
-
Michael+ANgels sword is better
-
Michael+ANgels sword is better
Really? When the game is 3-3 and you have Sog in your hand, Michael + Michael's Sword can search your deck for NJ so you can win??
-
oh noes!
And Angel of the Lord, too!
Ouch! What was that, Bryon, about not making any more fun cards for Genesis decks for a while?
-
Ouch! What was that, Bryon, about not making any more fun cards for Genesis decks for a while?
Well, the cards were printed before the promise of no toys...
-
If Micah and Asher returned cards to hand, how crazy it'd be...
-
It'd be broken :D Too bad micah doesn't return anb...
-
Too bad micah doesn't return anb...
No, no, that's not to bad at all... ;)
-
Too bad micah doesn't return anb...
No, no, that's not to bad at all... ;)
Its terrible... ;)
-
If my opponent had used Betrayal against me (or I used in side battle, perhaps?), could I band Micah in, then be able to recur my now 2/2.5 ANB?
Betrayal
Type: Evil Enh. • Brigade: Crimson • Ability: 1 / 1 • Class: None • Special Ability: All abilities (*/*) on good enhancements are worth half. • Identifiers: NT, Depicts a Weapon • Verse: Matthew 26:47 • Availability: Apostles booster packs (Uncommon)
-
The default target for all special abilities is "in play". Betrayal does not target enhancements in discard pile.
-
I was thinking that or more correctly abusive task masters but tim is right.
-
Micah + Hidden Treasures
yes, Yes, YES!
If Micah and Asher returned cards to hand, how crazy it'd be...
yes, yes, YES!
-
Too bad micah doesn't return anb...
No, no, that's not to bad at all... ;)
Its terrible... ;)
They purposely added the "*/4 or less" clause to prevent from recurring ANB, because that would be a terrible, horrible thing to do so easily.