Check out our Event Calendar! View birthdays, holidays and upcoming tournaments!
I think that's a bit harsh. He kind of fell on his sword for his own players, over what in the end is a pretty minor event: trading away their rings for tats. I really don't think that even compares to Free Shoes University up in Michigan, or the PAC 10 players who seem suddenly to afford brand new SUVs when they play.
I know you're a huge OSU fan, and this is probably painful. But as an objective person who doesn't care one way or the other about the program, it looks pretty bad.
I was not aware of any faith proclamation.
An objective person compares trying to shield a player's dumb mistakes with a man convicted of two dozen federal felonies, and says the former is worse?
Quote from: YourMathTeacher on May 31, 2011, 06:41:26 PMI was not aware of any faith proclamation. Then you haven't really been following this story, and you didn't read the article that I linked to in this thread.
I never said Tressel was worse than Baker or Swaggart. I said that his hypocrisy was more damaging than Camping.
No. I did not read the article, mostly because I do not care about Sports Illustrated's opinion. Given their insistence to produce the Swimsuit Issue, I have never taken them seriously.
Well, forgive me for whatever distinction you think exists in "This is more similar to the prominent downfalls a couple decades ago of Jim Baker and Jimmy Swaggart" that makes you NOT comparing him to them.
Tressel was out spoken about his faith and the media is certainly using that connection as a major point in this story.
The majority of people that have even heard of Jim Tressel are sports fans. If you took a poll of passerbys in your local Wal-Mart, I guarantee that most of them will have no idea who he is. If they did, they would probably now say, "Oh, he's that bad coach from Ohio State." There will be very few, if any, who would say, "Oh, he's that Christian guy that made a mockery of his faith."