Author Topic: Indirect negation?  (Read 5219 times)

Offline RTSmaniac

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • *****
  • Posts: 4289
    • LFG
    • Southeast Region
    • ROOT Online
Re: Indirect negation?
« Reply #25 on: March 09, 2011, 12:34:48 PM »
0
Quote
some people don't want to learn the rules?
I want to learn the rules, I just need a teacher that can help me understand.

So why do CBI/CBN cards stick to the table for even if the card that drew it was negated?
This is the way Lackey gave it to me. All hail the power of Lackey!

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: Indirect negation?
« Reply #26 on: March 09, 2011, 12:35:46 PM »
0
That's the rule.
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

Offline RTSmaniac

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • *****
  • Posts: 4289
    • LFG
    • Southeast Region
    • ROOT Online
Re: Indirect negation?
« Reply #27 on: March 09, 2011, 12:38:13 PM »
0
I know thats the rule but why?
This is the way Lackey gave it to me. All hail the power of Lackey!

Offline RTSmaniac

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • *****
  • Posts: 4289
    • LFG
    • Southeast Region
    • ROOT Online
Re: Indirect negation?
« Reply #28 on: March 09, 2011, 12:40:23 PM »
0
and i know why too but i what to see if anyone else knows...I was a wierd kid like that in school. I would raise my hand and ask questions that i knew the answers to because i knew others didnt understand or even didnt want to understand FTM-
This is the way Lackey gave it to me. All hail the power of Lackey!

Offline BubbleBoy

  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8014
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Indirect negation?
« Reply #29 on: March 09, 2011, 12:57:52 PM »
0
I was a wierd kid like that in school. I would raise my hand and ask questions that i knew the answers to because i knew others didnt understand or even didnt want to understand FTM-
Lol, I do the same thing sometimes. Usually only when I feel like the teacher is not making the topic clear enough though...
Use the Mad Bomber to rescue his Province.

Offline Red

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • *****
  • Posts: 4791
  • It takes time to build the boat.
    • LFG
    • Southeast Region
Re: Indirect negation?
« Reply #30 on: March 09, 2011, 01:08:52 PM »
0
But Play next is CBI so it won't be sent back.
Ironman 2016 and 2018 Winner.
3rd T1-2P 2018, 3rd T2-2P 2019
I survived the Flood twice.

Offline Gabe

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+69)
  • *****
  • Posts: 10675
  • From Moses to the prophets, it's all about Him!
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Land of Redemption
Re: Indirect negation?
« Reply #31 on: March 09, 2011, 01:41:43 PM »
0
But Play next is CBI so it won't be sent back.

If you step back and look at the big picture you'll see that there are actually a few different abilities happening.

1) Interrupt the battle

2) Draw 2 cards

3) Play an enhancement

4) Any abilities that result from that enhancement

Only ability #3 is CBI.  I cannot indirectly negate the enhancement by only negating ability number #3.

CBI does not extend from ability #3 to the other abilities on the list.  I can directly negate the enhancement that was played.  I can also indirectly negate the enhancement by other means.  One way to indirectly negate the played enhancement, if it was drawn, is to negate the ability that drew it.  That removes it from play and returns it to the deck.
Have you visited the Land of Redemption today?

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Indirect negation?
« Reply #32 on: March 09, 2011, 01:57:05 PM »
0
So, what about Tithe?  Can that be negated, and the enhancement sent to hand?
3) Play an enhancement
Only ability #3 is CBI.  I cannot indirectly negate the enhancement by only negating ability number #3.
So, is "place" the same as "play" in CBIness?  REG says:
Quote
the placed card remains with the second card until the second card is discarded, returned to the draw pile or hand, or until the placed card is removed by a special ability.

From my interpretation, place is CBI, because the special ability would have to remove the placed card, not negate the placing card.
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

browarod

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Indirect negation?
« Reply #33 on: March 09, 2011, 02:05:32 PM »
0
Only ability #3 is CBI.  ...

CBI does not extend from ability #3 to the other abilities on the list.
From my understanding, CBI/P/N on part of a card extends to the whole card in all other cases. Why is this different?

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Indirect negation?
« Reply #34 on: March 09, 2011, 03:07:58 PM »
0
From my understanding, the limited CBI here is due to game rule, not card ability.
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

browarod

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Indirect negation?
« Reply #35 on: March 09, 2011, 03:13:51 PM »
0
From my understanding, the limited CBI here is due to game rule, not card ability.
Even so, it seems like unnecessary confusion and inconsistency to allow "limited" CBP/I/N in game rules when it's not allowed on card abilities.

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: Indirect negation?
« Reply #36 on: March 09, 2011, 03:16:31 PM »
+1
Initiative cannot be negated. Drawing can.
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

browarod

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Indirect negation?
« Reply #37 on: March 09, 2011, 03:22:29 PM »
0
Initiative cannot be negated. Drawing can.
Thanks for restating what has already been said, but that doesn't answer (or even relate to) my question.

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: Indirect negation?
« Reply #38 on: March 09, 2011, 03:23:22 PM »
0
There is nothing convoluted or inconsistent about it. It's a four word rule.
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

browarod

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Indirect negation?
« Reply #39 on: March 09, 2011, 03:27:42 PM »
0
And I'm not arguing that part of the rule, hence why it doesn't relate to my question.

Offline Red

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • *****
  • Posts: 4791
  • It takes time to build the boat.
    • LFG
    • Southeast Region
Re: Indirect negation?
« Reply #40 on: March 09, 2011, 03:36:05 PM »
-3
You cannot undo the playing of an ehancement. Thus I belive Gabe is incorrect. If it's played it's sticks. You either remove the CBI on playing or you let it stick.
Ironman 2016 and 2018 Winner.
3rd T1-2P 2018, 3rd T2-2P 2019
I survived the Flood twice.

Offline galadgawyn

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 936
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: Indirect negation?
« Reply #41 on: March 11, 2011, 09:12:51 PM »
0
I'm not sure what the thread is but this has been asked before and answered by authorities similarly to what Red is saying. 

I've heard it ruled that once an enhancement is played it cannot be unplayed for any reason.  The enhancement of course can be negated but it sticks.  It was even ruled that if I just play the enhancement by initiative (not special ability), that also cannot be undone.  I agree that CBI should mean the same thing; not some CBI working differently than others.  If playing is truly CBI then like other CBI situations it can't undone even indirectly; the enhancement was played and can't be unplayed so it won't return to somewhere else. 

BTW, I thought playing was made CBI partly to stop loops like Claudia, ET, Abe's Servant, and get Abe's Servant back in hand.  I realize that Gabe's interpretation would not allow this but it would allow slightly modified versions like: Claudia, ET, Hozai, Abe's Servant and send Abe's Servant back, give the play from storehouse guy white or blue brigade and play Blessings from Storehouse and get it back, etc. 

I don't think those are game breaking but an example like that is what I recall as part of the explanation for the ruling.
Hopefully some elders can verify this.

Offline Red Dragon Thorn

  • Covenant Games
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5373
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Covenant Games
Re: Indirect negation?
« Reply #42 on: March 11, 2011, 11:03:20 PM »
0
We are discussing potential solutions to this on the Elder boards, we'll keep you up to date.
www.covenantgames.com

Offline RTSmaniac

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • *****
  • Posts: 4289
    • LFG
    • Southeast Region
    • ROOT Online
Re: Indirect negation?
« Reply #43 on: March 11, 2011, 11:05:10 PM »
0
this is what i was going on to galad
This is the way Lackey gave it to me. All hail the power of Lackey!

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal