Author Topic: WoNL  (Read 4467 times)

Offline Prof Underwood

  • Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8597
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: WoNL
« Reply #25 on: December 30, 2010, 10:15:56 AM »
0
Lets not bicker over who "owns" what deck type
"Let's not bicker and argue about oooo killed oooo."

Offline The M

  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2216
  • FALCON PUNCH!
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: WoNL
« Reply #26 on: December 30, 2010, 10:45:09 AM »
0
How about we have an unofficial multi at Nats with only WoNL disciples decks?
Retired?

Lamborghini_diablo

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: WoNL
« Reply #27 on: December 30, 2010, 11:57:46 AM »
0
Yeah and me and a freind of mine dreamed a WoNL deck like two months ago, but we never built it.  It has loads of potential.  I bring this up to make a point. Just because you have a great idea for a deck, and haven't seen anyone else talking about it or making it.  Please do not assume that you are the first or that it is your idea even if you build it first.  Laying claim to a deck that uses no special ability disciples and WoNL is not an original idea.  If I though of it, I am sure many of the elite players have already thought of it too.  I guess my point is (in my meandering way of saying things) is don't get upset if someone is building a deck like yours, its going to happen alot, especially as you become a better player.  There are a good number of viable strategies, but not enough where everyone's deck can be different.  Lets not bicker over who "owns" what deck type, because in the end there will almost always be someone who thought of it and used it earlier.  thats just my  :2cents:

I hope you realize he's not being super duper serious.  :P

Rawrlolsauce!

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: WoNL
« Reply #28 on: December 30, 2010, 12:59:44 PM »
0
Yeah and me and a freind of mine dreamed a WoNL deck like two months ago, but we never built it.  It has loads of potential.  I bring this up to make a point. Just because you have a great idea for a deck, and haven't seen anyone else talking about it or making it.  Please do not assume that you are the first or that it is your idea even if you build it first.  Laying claim to a deck that uses no special ability disciples and WoNL is not an original idea.  If I though of it, I am sure many of the elite players have already thought of it too.  I guess my point is (in my meandering way of saying things) is don't get upset if someone is building a deck like yours, its going to happen alot, especially as you become a better player.  There are a good number of viable strategies, but not enough where everyone's deck can be different.  Lets not bicker over who "owns" what deck type, because in the end there will almost always be someone who thought of it and used it earlier.  thats just my  :2cents:
FTR, I honestly don't care (nor does it matter) who came up with the idea. I originally referred to it as "my deck" as that was the deck I was planning to use for the next tournament, and beyond that was poking fun at the m.

Offline Korunks

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2271
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: WoNL
« Reply #29 on: December 30, 2010, 02:25:37 PM »
0
FTR, I honestly don't care (nor does it matter) who came up with the idea. I originally referred to it as "my deck" as that was the deck I was planning to use for the next tournament, and beyond that was poking fun at the m.

I hope you realize he's not being super duper serious.  :P

I thought that might be the case, but I have come across this attitude in others in the redemption community and felt this was a good place to get on my soap box for a moment.  Some people take children's card games a little too seriously. ;)
In AMERICA!!

Offline 3-Liner And Bags Of Chips

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+23)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2324
  • I'm officially a tourney host now...yippie!
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: WoNL
« Reply #30 on: December 30, 2010, 03:17:13 PM »
0
Yeah and me and a freind of mine dreamed a WoNL deck like two months ago, but we never built it.  It has loads of potential.  I bring this up to make a point. Just because you have a great idea for a deck, and haven't seen anyone else talking about it or making it.  Please do not assume that you are the first or that it is your idea even if you build it first.  Laying claim to a deck that uses no special ability disciples and WoNL is not an original idea.  If I though of it, I am sure many of the elite players have already thought of it too.  I guess my point is (in my meandering way of saying things) is don't get upset if someone is building a deck like yours, its going to happen alot, especially as you become a better player.  There are a good number of viable strategies, but not enough where everyone's deck can be different.  Lets not bicker over who "owns" what deck type, because in the end there will almost always be someone who thought of it and used it earlier.  thats just my  :2cents:

yay i got a shout-out whoo-whoo!
Polar Bears Rule Teh World
Sponsered by CountFount
http://sites.google.com/site/marylandredemption

Offline Korunks

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2271
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: WoNL
« Reply #31 on: December 30, 2010, 03:46:27 PM »
0
yay i got a shout-out whoo-whoo!

Yay although I like the offense you came up with better than the WoNL one I came up with ;)
In AMERICA!!

Offline 3-Liner And Bags Of Chips

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+23)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2324
  • I'm officially a tourney host now...yippie!
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: WoNL
« Reply #32 on: December 30, 2010, 03:54:56 PM »
0
yay i got a shout-out whoo-whoo!

Yay although I like the offense you came up with better than the WoNL one I came up with ;)

I'm pretty sure you did since you ended up using it in my tourney xp
Polar Bears Rule Teh World
Sponsered by CountFount
http://sites.google.com/site/marylandredemption

Lamborghini_diablo

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: WoNL
« Reply #33 on: December 30, 2010, 04:51:40 PM »
+1
Some people take children's card games a little too seriously. ;)

Who doesn't.... IN AMERCIA


Warrior_Monk

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: WoNL
« Reply #34 on: December 30, 2010, 06:17:40 PM »
0
FTR, I honestly don't care (nor does it matter) who came up with the idea. I originally referred to it as "my deck" as that was the deck I was planning to use for the next tournament, and beyond that was poking fun at the m.
If you want to use it, I can build a different one. Although I guarentee that my version will be VERY different than yours.

Also, the WoNL/Disciples isn't the sole concept of the deck. I only plan on using 6-12ish no-sa's.

Rawrlolsauce!

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: WoNL
« Reply #35 on: December 30, 2010, 07:22:45 PM »
0
Nah, its all good. I'm making Lambo build me a deck. He now must listen to every command I give him beings I wrecked him in a certain game 50 times in a row <3

Lamborghini_diablo

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: WoNL
« Reply #36 on: December 30, 2010, 07:26:32 PM »
0
Nah, its all good. I'm making Lambo build me a deck. He now must listen to every command I give him beings I wrecked him in a certain game 50 times in a row <3

Just you wait till I get a rapier of my own. I refuse to sell my shiny armor though.  :P

Warrior_Monk

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: WoNL
« Reply #37 on: January 14, 2011, 09:45:27 PM »
0
BUMP.

Offline The Guardian

  • Playtester, Redemption Elder
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+96)
  • *****
  • Posts: 12344
  • The Stars are coming out...
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: WoNL
« Reply #38 on: January 20, 2011, 10:02:27 AM »
0
This is now listed in the REG Corrections thread.
Fortress Alstad
Have you checked the REG?
Have you looked it up in ORCID?

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal