Author Topic: WoNL  (Read 4450 times)

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
WoNL
« on: December 16, 2010, 01:24:43 PM »
+1
Since I've asked over and over again why WoNL is not a HT Artifact and been thoroughly ignored every time, I figured I'd make a thread about it. Why is WoNL not a Herod's Temple Artifact? Is there any good evidence to show that Herod's Temple did not have narrow widows?
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

Offline Alex_Olijar

  • 16plus
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • *
  • Posts: 8124
  • This guy is my mascot
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: WoNL
« Reply #1 on: December 16, 2010, 01:42:28 PM »
+1
There is not. I always assumed that was a REG error.

Offline TheJaylor

  • Trade Count: (+18)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3119
  • Fortress Alstad
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Redemption with Jayden
Re: WoNL
« Reply #2 on: December 16, 2010, 02:13:23 PM »
0
WoNL can't go in there? that's weird i thought it could.

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: WoNL
« Reply #3 on: December 16, 2010, 02:39:49 PM »
0
Since I've asked over and over again why WoNL is not a HT Artifact and been thoroughly ignored every time, I figured I'd make a thread about it. Why is WoNL not a Herod's Temple Artifact? Is there any good evidence to show that Herod's Temple did not have narrow widows?
Is there any good evidence showing that it did?
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: WoNL
« Reply #4 on: December 16, 2010, 02:54:06 PM »
0
The burden of proof lies the other way. If all the other temples had it, you have to have proof that Herod's didn't.
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

Offline Korunks

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2271
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: WoNL
« Reply #5 on: December 16, 2010, 02:58:42 PM »
+1
The burden of proof lies the other way. If all the other temples had it, you have to have proof that Herod's didn't.

Especially since they are the same structure.  Unless they replaced all the windows during Herod's "renovation" with larger ones this seems like an odd reason to exclude it.  And I would ask for proof that window enlargement was performed during Herod's renovation.
In AMERICA!!

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: WoNL
« Reply #6 on: December 16, 2010, 02:59:23 PM »
0
As you can see, the windows were quite square.

Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

Offline Korunks

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2271
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: WoNL
« Reply #7 on: December 16, 2010, 03:01:54 PM »
+3
They look rectangular to me not perfectly square, regardless narrow doesn't mean non-square.  They can be square and still be narrow.


*** The windows in the back section look narrow to me.
In AMERICA!!

Offline Professoralstad

  • Tournament Host, Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+47)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10841
  • Everything is Awesome!
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: WoNL
« Reply #8 on: December 16, 2010, 04:35:36 PM »
+2
I see no reason why the Windows should be in ZT but not HT, as some brief research revealed that they are believed to be the same structure, but HT is just a renovation and expansion of ZT. I have brought this issue before the Elders, and we will see what happens.
Press 1 for more options.

Lamborghini_diablo

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: WoNL
« Reply #9 on: December 16, 2010, 05:27:22 PM »
+6
I looked at the card again, and discovered something in the identifiers. Take a second look...


Offline YourMathTeacher

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+80)
  • *****
  • Posts: 11089
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: WoNL
« Reply #10 on: December 16, 2010, 05:46:24 PM »
+2
..., regardless narrow doesn't mean non-square.  They can be square and still be narrow.

Geometrically speaking, this is not true. Here is the definition of narrow:

narrow  (ˈnærəʊ)  
— adj  
1.  small in breadth, esp in comparison to length  

------------------------

However, I agree that there are several sets of windows in the picture that are not square, and should therefore be considered narrow.
My wife is a hottie.

Offline STAMP

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+19)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5014
  • Redemption brings Freedom
    • -
    • Northwest Region
Re: WoNL
« Reply #11 on: December 16, 2010, 07:32:29 PM »
+1
It's the light that's narrow, so square windows with blinds count.  :P
Final ANB errata: Return player to game.

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: WoNL
« Reply #12 on: December 16, 2010, 08:16:56 PM »
+7
Well that depends on if light is photons or waves.  Still waiting for a ruling from the elders on that one too.
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: WoNL
« Reply #13 on: December 17, 2010, 02:53:40 AM »
+3
Well that depends on if light is photons or waves.  Still waiting for a ruling from the elders on that one too.
Idk why that post got thumbed down, but I thought it was quite witty.
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

Offline The Guardian

  • Playtester, Redemption Elder
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+96)
  • *****
  • Posts: 12344
  • The Stars are coming out...
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: WoNL
« Reply #14 on: December 17, 2010, 04:15:21 AM »
0
Well that depends on if light is photons or waves.  Still waiting for a ruling from the elders on that one too.

I defer to Einstein...
Fortress Alstad
Have you checked the REG?
Have you looked it up in ORCID?

Offline Prof Underwood

  • Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8597
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: WoNL
« Reply #15 on: December 17, 2010, 09:21:30 AM »
+1
Well that depends on if light is photons or waves.  Still waiting for a ruling from the elders on that one too.
Clearly, light is made of photons...that are moving in wave-like patterns :)

And ftr, I thought the comment was funny, too.

Warrior_Monk

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: WoNL
« Reply #16 on: December 29, 2010, 11:47:32 AM »
0
bump. Any decision made?

Rawrlolsauce!

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: WoNL
« Reply #17 on: December 29, 2010, 01:46:20 PM »
0
bump. Any decision made?
Are you going to steal my deck? >:c

Warrior_Monk

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: WoNL
« Reply #18 on: December 29, 2010, 01:54:14 PM »
+1
bump. Any decision made?
Are you going to steal my deck? >:c
Building it now.  :maul:

Rawrlolsauce!

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: WoNL
« Reply #19 on: December 29, 2010, 02:00:52 PM »
0

Warrior_Monk

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: WoNL
« Reply #20 on: December 29, 2010, 02:08:09 PM »
0
MUAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Good find. Wow. That's sick. Enhancementless deck FTW.

Offline The M

  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2216
  • FALCON PUNCH!
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: WoNL
« Reply #21 on: December 29, 2010, 03:07:48 PM »
-1
I already have one so you are both stealing my idea!!!
Retired?

Rawrlolsauce!

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: WoNL
« Reply #22 on: December 29, 2010, 04:49:28 PM »
0
Having a card doesn't mean you had an idea. I demand proof you had it before us >:c

Offline The M

  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2216
  • FALCON PUNCH!
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: WoNL
« Reply #23 on: December 29, 2010, 05:21:20 PM »
0
I have no proof, but I already have a WoNL Disciples deck.
Retired?

Offline Korunks

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2271
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: WoNL
« Reply #24 on: December 30, 2010, 09:34:13 AM »
0
Yeah and me and a freind of mine dreamed a WoNL deck like two months ago, but we never built it.  It has loads of potential.  I bring this up to make a point. Just because you have a great idea for a deck, and haven't seen anyone else talking about it or making it.  Please do not assume that you are the first or that it is your idea even if you build it first.  Laying claim to a deck that uses no special ability disciples and WoNL is not an original idea.  If I though of it, I am sure many of the elite players have already thought of it too.  I guess my point is (in my meandering way of saying things) is don't get upset if someone is building a deck like yours, its going to happen alot, especially as you become a better player.  There are a good number of viable strategies, but not enough where everyone's deck can be different.  Lets not bicker over who "owns" what deck type, because in the end there will almost always be someone who thought of it and used it earlier.  thats just my  :2cents:
In AMERICA!!

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal