Author Topic: Protect vs immune  (Read 1113 times)

Offline christiangamer25

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 966
  • In brightest day, in blackest night...
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Protect vs immune
« on: August 30, 2014, 10:59:52 PM »
0
I know this is going to sound dumb but with the influx of new regardless of protection cards does immunity function separate from protection giving cards that use immunity wording the ability to still be untouched by regardless of protection cards
No evil shall escape my sight, Let those who worship evil beware my power, Green Lantern's light

Chris

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Protect vs immune
« Reply #1 on: August 31, 2014, 12:26:45 AM »
0
Immune and protect are currently separate, but there are at least a handful of people who want them to be the same, since they have the exact same function right now.

Offline RTSmaniac

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • *****
  • Posts: 4289
    • LFG
    • Southeast Region
    • ROOT Online
Re: Protect vs immune
« Reply #2 on: August 31, 2014, 11:06:19 PM »
+1
besides being able to not be targeted by rop (regardless of protection) abilities...
This is the way Lackey gave it to me. All hail the power of Lackey!

Offline ChristianSoldier

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1613
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Protect vs immune
« Reply #3 on: August 31, 2014, 11:20:27 PM »
0
besides being able to not be targeted by rop (regardless of protection) abilities...

They have the same effect, but aren't the same condition. Which is a bit stupid. I would love to see them combined completely.
If you are reading this signature, thank a physicist.

Offline Redoubter

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4910
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Protect vs immune
« Reply #4 on: September 01, 2014, 12:09:27 AM »
0
I'd be in favor of 'protect' only applying to abilities and game rules, and 'immune' staying the same.  Basically, taking the numbers part away from protection.  Though I'd be happy with them being the exact same key word as well.

Rule as it currently stands is correctly described above, though.

Offline ChristianSoldier

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1613
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Protect vs immune
« Reply #5 on: September 01, 2014, 12:12:51 AM »
0
I'd be in favor of 'protect' only applying to abilities and game rules, and 'immune' staying the same.  Basically, taking the numbers part away from protection.

I'd accept this too, my biggest issue is with two different abilities that do identical things.
If you are reading this signature, thank a physicist.

Offline RTSmaniac

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • *****
  • Posts: 4289
    • LFG
    • Southeast Region
    • ROOT Online
Re: Protect vs immune
« Reply #6 on: September 02, 2014, 08:33:38 AM »
0
I feel keeping them different opens the game to having more versatility in future gameplay, however they could just name future gameplay mechanics something different i guess...
This is the way Lackey gave it to me. All hail the power of Lackey!

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal