Author Topic: First Strike?  (Read 1804 times)

Offline Master_Chi

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1367
  • I choose you, Pikachu.
First Strike?
« on: February 07, 2011, 11:44:23 AM »
0
1) What is the use of first strike in deck-building strategy?

2) Could an offense be built around such a strategy?
I'm sorry I crammed 11 cookies in the VCR.

Offline Professoralstad

  • Tournament Host, Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+47)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10841
  • Everything is Awesome!
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: First Strike?
« Reply #1 on: February 07, 2011, 02:21:16 PM »
0
1) What is the use of first strike in deck-building strategy?

There are a few EC's (Abner, Sennacherib, King So) that take advantage of First Strike, especially vs. FBTN characters (since their FS is CBN in most circumstances). All three of those characters will outright beat any FBTN Hero except Captain if no enhancements are played.

Also, Emperors are good vs. FBTN Heroes for the same reason as long as Rome is in play.

Quote
2) Could an offense be built around such a strategy?

I have an offensive combo that, if it can get set up, can utilize First Strike really well. But I have found that it requires a lot of cards to set up. And it works mostly for T2, though T1 decks could have a smaller, still decent version of it.

However, most offensive FS is more of a detriment. Ehud would be a much more powerful card without FS, since he has to choose an EC with toughness of 8 or higher to have initiative.
Press 1 for more options.

Offline RTSmaniac

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • *****
  • Posts: 4289
    • LFG
    • Southeast Region
    • ROOT Online
Re: First Strike?
« Reply #2 on: February 07, 2011, 05:52:09 PM »
0
First Strike works well against an opponent with no hand.
This is the way Lackey gave it to me. All hail the power of Lackey!

Offline Master_Chi

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1367
  • I choose you, Pikachu.
Re: First Strike?
« Reply #3 on: February 08, 2011, 08:56:14 AM »
0
However, most offensive FS is more of a detriment. Ehud would be a much more powerful card without FS, since he has to choose an EC with toughness of 8 or higher to have initiative.

So First Strike also passes your initiative in case of a mutual destruction?
I'm sorry I crammed 11 cookies in the VCR.

The Schaef

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: First Strike?
« Reply #4 on: February 08, 2011, 09:14:25 AM »
0
CBP first strike is a good defense against FBN offense, but only if you are trying to win numbers battles, which most people these days rely on specials and try to keep their numbers as low as possible.

Offline galadgawyn

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 936
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: First Strike?
« Reply #5 on: February 09, 2011, 04:32:08 PM »
0
I have found numbers to still frequently win on offense and defense.  Especially early in a game before the opponent has much or late in game or after big battles where again the opponent's cards are exhausted. 


Quote
However, most offensive FS is more of a detriment. Ehud would be a much more powerful card without FS, since he has to choose an EC with toughness of 8 or higher to have initiative.

This is how I have played it from the beginning.  Recently, I saw it ruled that in fact if Ehud is going against a 10/4 evil character, first strike does not pass initiative and Ehud can still play first.  The reason was that the definition of first strike is the character survives a mutual destruction scenario and that is not determined until battle resolution so first strike does not affect intiative or the battle until battle resolution. 

Would like to know definitively about this.

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: First Strike?
« Reply #6 on: February 09, 2011, 04:54:05 PM »
0
Same here.  I thought initiative went to the EC in that situation.
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

Offline Noah

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • *****
  • Posts: 672
  • AKA: tripleplayno3
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: First Strike?
« Reply #7 on: February 09, 2011, 05:02:24 PM »
0
Same here.  I thought initiative went to the EC in that situation.

Can we get a official ruling on this? I'd realy like to know for sure.
Filling my Ark since Nats 2016.

Soli Deo Gloria

#CascadeDelendaEst

Offline Gabe

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+69)
  • *****
  • Posts: 10675
  • From Moses to the prophets, it's all about Him!
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Land of Redemption
Re: First Strike?
« Reply #8 on: February 09, 2011, 05:35:25 PM »
+1
Quote from: REG
First strike is considered when determining initiative and during battle resolution.

I think it's safe to trust the REG on this one.  In the example above Ehud does not get initiative.
Have you visited the Land of Redemption today?

Offline Noah

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • *****
  • Posts: 672
  • AKA: tripleplayno3
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: First Strike?
« Reply #9 on: February 09, 2011, 05:38:27 PM »
0
Quote from: REG
First strike is considered when determining initiative and during battle resolution.

I think it's safe to trust the REG on this one.  In the example above Ehud does not get initiative.

Thanks for clarifying that.
Filling my Ark since Nats 2016.

Soli Deo Gloria

#CascadeDelendaEst

Offline Master_Chi

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1367
  • I choose you, Pikachu.
Re: First Strike?
« Reply #10 on: February 10, 2011, 09:20:23 AM »
0
Quote from: REG
First strike is considered when determining initiative and during battle resolution.

I think it's safe to trust the REG on this one.  In the example above Ehud does not get initiative.

Thanks, Gabe!
I'm sorry I crammed 11 cookies in the VCR.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal