Welcome to the Official Redemption® Message Board!
From how it's worded, i would say yes, because "this" isn't clarified to only be the search.
Are there any cases already where only part of an ability is CBx? I'm pretty sure there's precedent that an entire ability is always CBx or it's not. No partial CBx's. Maybe not, but I'm pretty sure that's the way it is.
When a sentence in a special ability includes the cannot be negated modifier and does not specify what abilities the cannot be negated modifier modifies, it modifies all abilities on the card that appear before the sentence containing “cannot be negated”.
I believe our conclusion during playtesting was that the entire ability was CBI. I do not recall offhand how we made that determination, but I think we had a precedent.
No because of dominant that has already been played cannot put back even if the card that got it out is negated.
Are you saying that the only things that can be Cascade negated are things in play? So if you went and got guardians of your souls that could not be put back either. So only cards that are no longer in play are not affected by negating the character?
So going back to my original statement dominant cards that have already been played cannot be negated so they stay.
I understand what you're saying but I think you're creating more than there needs to be. You had to edit your comment about the three woes. I didn't think the Cascade negates affected cannot be negated cards. So you're right about the angel of the Lord but it wouldn't be the same reason for the three woes.
So let's go back to my original statement one more time. Dominant cards that have already been played cannot be unplayed. I don't care why if it's game rules or if it's can not be negated and I don't think anyone else cares as long as the statement is correct. So do you agree that the statement above is correct?
ok...I am just speechless...