I never brought identifiers into this ruling. You did. You're just trying to draw me into the stupid "identifiers in the draw/discard pile" argument which I refuse to be a part of. So, to answer your unnecessary question:
so you're ruling that some things in the identifier line can be negated? :-
No. I'm ruling that Wall of Protection does not protect the card in The Darkness. That's it. Fini. Any peripheral rulings that you
want to tie into this (just to vent about the Lampstand ruling) is completely irrelevant to me.
