Author Topic: Dust and Ashes vs Peter's Curse  (Read 590 times)

Lamborghini_diablo

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Dust and Ashes vs Peter's Curse
« on: August 20, 2010, 01:58:57 PM »
0
What happens if Peters Curse is placed on Job while Dust and Ashes is out?

When you play this card, search discard pile for Job. If your Job is harmed or defeated by an opponent, you may place him here instead. Each upkeep, return contents to hand. Cannot be negated. Plays to Set-Aside.

Place on a Hero or good Fortress: Negate that card's special ability. When you play a good Dominant, discard this Curse. Cannot be negated.

Im pretty sure it's considered harm, but the question is, what happens to Peter's Curse when job is put in dust and ashes? Smokey said that the instead on D&A essentially canceled the placement of Peters Curse, causing it to go back to the artifact pile.

Offline The M

  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2216
  • FALCON PUNCH!
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Dust and Ashes vs Peter's Curse
« Reply #1 on: August 20, 2010, 02:00:17 PM »
0
that is weird... recurring peters curse by using it uselessly.
hmm...
Retired?

Rawrlolsauce!

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Dust and Ashes vs Peter's Curse
« Reply #2 on: August 20, 2010, 02:00:48 PM »
0
edit; misread

Offline Professoralstad

  • Tournament Host, Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+47)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10841
  • Everything is Awesome!
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Dust and Ashes vs Peter's Curse
« Reply #3 on: August 20, 2010, 02:13:56 PM »
+1
Smokey said that the instead on D&A essentially canceled the placement of Peters Curse, causing it to go back to the artifact pile.

I agree with that.
Press 1 for more options.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal