Welcome to the Official Redemption® Message Board!
Lambo you're wrong unless I can ACIB Red Dragon with Salome.
Protect is not the exact same thing as immunity.
Immune and protect are given two seperate sections, but this is listed under protect:• The phrases “immune to”, “ignores”, “cannot be”, “may not be”, “may only be _____ by”, “must be _____ by”, “no _____ may be, “prevented from being”, “protected from”, and “protect” have the same function.I'm sure thats either poorly worded, or outdated, because I know for a FACT "Ignores" works very differently than everything else in that list.
I would say the big difference between an "immune" character and a "protected" character is that the protected character can still lose by numbers.
Quote from: JDS on August 30, 2010, 01:03:55 PMI would say the big difference between an "immune" character and a "protected" character is that the protected character can still lose by numbers.That has been ruled to NOT be the case for Protection of Angels. A Hero who plays that and is losing BTN would be in a stalemate, much like immunity. If Protection and immunity are clarified in the next REG (which I assume will happen) that ruling may change.
So Thad is basically unstoppable?Daniel
Protect allows cards to be unaffected by specified special abilities and is related to cards that specify “cannot be” or “may not be” (see Cannot be in the glossary). Protected cards cannot be targeted for harm. Cards that protect give an ability like immune to the cards they protect (see Immune).