Author Topic: Thad vs. Stone of Thebez  (Read 970 times)

Offline Prof Underwood

  • Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8597
    • -
    • East Central Region
Thad vs. Stone of Thebez
« on: May 31, 2013, 11:14:00 AM »
0
I'm just clarifying that Stone of Thebez can discard Thad even if he's protected right?

Chris

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Thad vs. Stone of Thebez
« Reply #1 on: May 31, 2013, 11:26:21 AM »
+1
That is correct. Thad's CBI status is irrelevant here, since Stone does not seek to negate Thad in order to discard him, it's simply disregarding his protection.

Offline Alex_Olijar

  • 16plus
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • *
  • Posts: 8124
  • This guy is my mascot
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Thad vs. Stone of Thebez
« Reply #2 on: May 31, 2013, 11:45:48 AM »
0
Agree with this. This question, while common, probably shouldn't be common considering the pains you took to write it to beat Thad.

Offline Red Dragon Thorn

  • Covenant Games
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5373
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Covenant Games
Re: Thad vs. Stone of Thebez
« Reply #3 on: May 31, 2013, 12:22:40 PM »
+7
Actually, that was an eleventh hour change.

Suggested by me.

You're welcome.
www.covenantgames.com

Offline Alex_Olijar

  • 16plus
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • *
  • Posts: 8124
  • This guy is my mascot
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Thad vs. Stone of Thebez
« Reply #4 on: May 31, 2013, 12:27:59 PM »
0
Regardless of when, it's obviously written to bypass that stuff.

Offline Gabe

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+69)
  • *****
  • Posts: 10675
  • From Moses to the prophets, it's all about Him!
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Land of Redemption
Re: Thad vs. Stone of Thebez
« Reply #5 on: May 31, 2013, 12:33:32 PM »
+5
Regardless of when, it's obviously written to bypass that stuff.

While true, that doesn't mean that Mark was involved, tested it or is completely clear on how it works. ::)

Actually, that was an eleventh hour change.

Suggested by me.

You're welcome.

If I recall, it was a little bit of a battle to get the regardless clause added but I'm very glad we did. More for Gideon than for Thad!
Have you visited the Land of Redemption today?

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal