Author Topic: Tartaros Please Modify REG/Errata to say Tartaros is Set-Aside (Read 1575 times)

DaClock · « **on:** August 21, 2009, 09:55:31 PM »

I was recently told that Tartaros has errata that it is played to the set aside area. However, this isn't on the Errata list or in the REG. Is this true and unwritten? Or is it unwritten because it's false?

Master KChief · « **Reply #1 on:** August 21, 2009, 09:56:56 PM »

probably the latter.

redemption99 · « **Reply #2 on:** August 21, 2009, 09:59:13 PM »

if it's in play that makes it a lot more useful

Isildur · « **Reply #3 on:** August 21, 2009, 10:13:27 PM »

I think it may be unwritten. It was decided on the boards a while back I think after one of those 30 page fueds between Schaef and Bryon. Was it deleted in one of the great board purges?

sk · « **Reply #4 on:** August 21, 2009, 10:14:57 PM »

That's possible, but I thought it was more resent than the last plurge. It does play to set aside, though, per Bryon. Why it is not in a play-as, I don't know, because I thought it was added on on a list to be added.

However, the REG does refer to Tartaros as a fort that goes to set aside:

Instant Abilities > Return to Draw Pile > Special Conditions
"Although characters in Kingdoms of the World and Goshen are protected, the Fortresses themselves are not protected and are shuffled into the draw pile. Any characters inside them are no longer protected and are shuffled into the draw pile as well. The same is true of fortress cards in a set-aside area such as Potter’s Field and Tartaros."

Isildur · « **Reply #5 on:** August 21, 2009, 10:16:46 PM »

How you found that I dont know... God has given you a gift. The Gift to shift through the deep deep hellish pits of text known as the Redemption REG.

DaClock · « **Reply #6 on:** August 21, 2009, 10:21:26 PM »

SK, thats an interesting quote. Its odd that it would be referred to as a card that gets set aside even though it isn't designated as one anywhere.

sk · « **Reply #7 on:** August 21, 2009, 10:28:42 PM »

Apparently, you've asked this question before, DaClock...

Also, I found another thread where a bunch of people were sitting around wondering about the REG's entry. I have no idea why it died without a resolve, though.

Then there's this thread that started about The Pit (but morphed into a Tartaros discussion), but includes a post I made but had forgotten about with info on previous Tartaros threads, which includes this thread with a good discussion of it and reasoning from Bryon and Schaef.

I find it funny that the issue is quickly solved that it goes to set aside once quotes and rulings are presented, but as soon as someone mentions updating the REG entry, the thread dies...

Isildur · « **Reply #8 on:** August 21, 2009, 10:30:57 PM »

lol wow that thread died in a hurry

DaClock · « **Reply #9 on:** August 21, 2009, 11:53:34 PM »

Wow, I didn't even remember asking this before. Oh well. Even so, I think that it needs to be updated in the REG or at least on the errata list on the boards.

777Godspeed · « **Reply #10 on:** August 22, 2009, 12:00:03 AM »

Quote from: sk on August 21, 2009, 10:28:42 PM

I find it funny that the issue is quickly solved that it goes to set aside once quotes and rulings are presented, but as soon as someone mentions updating the REG entry, the thread dies...

Quote from: DaClock on August 21, 2009, 11:53:34 PM

Wow, I didn't even remember asking this before. Oh well. Even so, I think that it needs to be updated in the REG or at least on the errata list on the boards.

Shaazam........in before thread death.

Godspeed,
Mike

Cactus Game Design Message Boards

News: