Author Topic: So out of curiousity, why does Rob refuse to ban cards?  (Read 6876 times)

Offline Professoralstad

  • Tournament Host, Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+47)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10841
  • Everything is Awesome!
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: So out of curiousity, why does Rob refuse to ban cards?
« Reply #25 on: March 22, 2011, 11:16:03 AM »
0
Thaddeus would be protected from goliath once he gets his disciples out wouldn't he?

If he can get all 11 out (or 8 and Crown of Thorns) then yes. I didn't say it was foolproof, but if you can manage to keep the number of Disciples down to reasonable levels, then Thaddeus is owned.
You only need 7 ::)

Hmm, I thought Thaddeus said less than X not X or less. I was mistaken. Still, if you can target the right Disciples early (i.e. many decks will have multiple copies of Thad, Matthew, and James Son of A, but probably only one Peter or Andrew (and definitely only one Simon the Zealot) then you have a chance of keeping the numbers down.

In response to Pol, I was referring more to T2. Thad is much more manageable through other means in T1 IMO.
Press 1 for more options.

Rawrlolsauce!

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: So out of curiousity, why does Rob refuse to ban cards?
« Reply #26 on: March 22, 2011, 11:33:27 AM »
0
I vote we change the rules and give experience credit for a successful taunt. That'd make it even easier.

slugfencer

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: So out of curiousity, why does Rob refuse to ban cards?
« Reply #27 on: March 23, 2011, 12:24:38 PM »
0
So now since immunity works vs thad (per recent threads), if Goliath is wearing his armor in battle he would be immune to pumped up 11 discipled crowned thad, correct?  ???

Goliath’s Armor (FF)
Type: Evil Enh. • Brigade: Black • Ability: 0 / 5 • Class: Weapon • Special Ability: Bearer is immune to purple brigade. Cannot be negated. • Play As: Bearer is immune to purple brigade. Cannot be negated. If placed on Goliath, Goliath may hold until discarded. • Identifiers: OT, Depicts a Weapon • Verse: I Samuel 17:5-6 • Availability: Faith of our Fathers booster packs (None)


Offline EmJayBee83

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5486
  • Ha! It's funny because the squirrel gets dead.
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • mjb Games
Re: So out of curiousity, why does Rob refuse to ban cards?
« Reply #28 on: March 23, 2011, 12:35:40 PM »
0
Correct.  And since the immunity is CBN--Goliath would win the battle.*



*More specifically--I do not know how to get around CBN immunity.
« Last Edit: March 23, 2011, 12:37:58 PM by EmJayBee83 »

Rawrlolsauce!

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: So out of curiousity, why does Rob refuse to ban cards?
« Reply #29 on: March 23, 2011, 01:02:48 PM »
+1
Coat of Many Colors + Plague of Frogs
Discard his armour in territory.
Attack with a red disciple.
Don't play disciples.

Offline RTSmaniac

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • *****
  • Posts: 4289
    • LFG
    • Southeast Region
    • ROOT Online
Re: So out of curiousity, why does Rob refuse to ban cards?
« Reply #30 on: March 23, 2011, 01:44:06 PM »
0
and grapes/aotl or grail
This is the way Lackey gave it to me. All hail the power of Lackey!

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: So out of curiousity, why does Rob refuse to ban cards?
« Reply #31 on: March 23, 2011, 02:01:30 PM »
0
As well as Ark of the Covenant.  (Who uses that anyway...)
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

Offline JSB23

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3197
  • Fun while it lasted.
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: So out of curiousity, why does Rob refuse to ban cards?
« Reply #32 on: March 23, 2011, 04:03:18 PM »
0
and will prove to be incredibly hard to get rid of with a generic character that can recur him, and be recurred.

Nazareth says hi
« Last Edit: March 23, 2011, 05:37:57 PM by JSB23 »
An unanswered question is infinitely better than an unquestioned answer.

Offline Professoralstad

  • Tournament Host, Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+47)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10841
  • Everything is Awesome!
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: So out of curiousity, why does Rob refuse to ban cards?
« Reply #33 on: March 23, 2011, 04:10:27 PM »
0
Neither Nazareth nor Thaddeus will stop Philistine Armorbearer from retrieving Goliath from the discard pile. And even Philistine Outpost (which can be used in triplicate in T2) can discard itself to get PAB back, if Nazareth is stopping you from discarding from your deck.

Obviously, all of this is speculation until Goliath is released. But hey, I'm entitled to my opinions right?

And of course, since Goliath can potentially shut down every other common T2 offense all by himself (except Red of course  :P) a Philistine player should easily have room for 2-3 copies of Goliath's Armor.
« Last Edit: March 23, 2011, 04:14:21 PM by Professoralstad »
Press 1 for more options.

Offline EmJayBee83

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5486
  • Ha! It's funny because the squirrel gets dead.
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • mjb Games
Re: So out of curiousity, why does Rob refuse to ban cards?
« Reply #34 on: March 23, 2011, 10:46:59 PM »
0
So now since immunity works vs thad (per recent threads), if Goliath is wearing his armor in battle he would be immune to pumped up 11 discipled crowned thad, correct?  ???

Correct.  And since the immunity is CBN--Goliath would win the battle.*

Coat of Many Colors + Plague of Frogs
Discard his armour in territory.
Attack with a red disciple.
Don't play disciples.

and grapes
aotl
or grail
As well as Ark of the Covenant.  (Who uses that anyway...)

There you go.  Crossing out all of the options that either don't meet the conditions that Slug Fencer put forward or don't result in Goliath beating Thad we see that you have a huge list of choices.

If you have Angel of the Lord in your hand you are most likely going to win a battle against a lone blocker. If you are one of the three people in the world you use Coat of Many Colors and happen to have both it and Plague of Frogs in your hand at the same time you also have a shot provided your opponent doesn't have Joseph in Prison or Bringing Fear or any other interrupt. Color me impressed.

And of course, since Goliath can potentially shut down every other common T2 offense all by himself...
Except the Garden Ladies because Phillies have absolutely no protection against territory destruction, nothing to stop pre-block ignore, and the thing that helped them stave off this trouble previously (the Outpost) got hurt badly in this regard by Nazareth.

slugfencer

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: So out of curiousity, why does Rob refuse to ban cards?
« Reply #35 on: March 23, 2011, 11:25:32 PM »
0
Correct.  And since the immunity is CBN--Goliath would win the battle.*



*More specifically--I do not know how to get around CBN immunity.

Cool. So another question that I don't understand--since the immunity works vs supathad, I know red dragon immunity is easily killed by reach/aoc. So CBN immunity (goliaths armor/balaams disob) vs supathad can that be reach/aoc'd? I ask because I am wondering if thad's special powers wipe out that CBN stuff like it normally does (king zed/dungeon won't work vs thad even tho it CBN)? Hope this makes sense? ??? Thanks! :)

Offline EmJayBee83

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5486
  • Ha! It's funny because the squirrel gets dead.
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • mjb Games
Re: So out of curiousity, why does Rob refuse to ban cards?
« Reply #36 on: March 23, 2011, 11:44:15 PM »
0
Correct.  And since the immunity is CBN--Goliath would win the battle.*

Cool. So another question that I don't understand--since the immunity works vs supathad, I know red dragon immunity is easily killed by reach/aoc. So CBN immunity (goliaths armor/balaams disob) vs supathad can that be reach/aoc'd?
No. Reach/AoC works against Red Dragon because you are interrupting the Dragon's immunity with reach. Since Goliath's Armor/Balaam's Disobedience are CBN, reach cannot interrupt the immunity they confer.

Quote
I ask because I am wondering if thad's special powers wipe out that CBN stuff like it normally does (king zed/dungeon won't work vs thad even tho it CBN)?
King Zed + Dungeon won't work because Protect (Thad) beats CBN (DoM).  (And CBN beats Negate and Negate beats Protect.)

One interesting side effect of all this is that you can play negates to your hearts content when blocking Thaddeus (unless they target a CBN card). So, say your opponent has an OT artifact active and 8 disciples out when he makes a rescue with Thad.  If you block with Philistine Priests (5/5) it will negate the OT artifact even though Thaddees is protecting it from ECs with toughness less than 8.  Kinda cool, huh?  I only wish I could figure out how to take meaningful advantage of this loophole.
« Last Edit: March 23, 2011, 11:54:09 PM by EmJayBee83 »

Offline Korunks

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2271
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: So out of curiousity, why does Rob refuse to ban cards?
« Reply #37 on: March 24, 2011, 08:12:45 AM »
0
One interesting side effect of all this is that you can play negates to your hearts content when blocking Thaddeus (unless they target a CBN card). So, say your opponent has an OT artifact active and 8 disciples out when he makes a rescue with Thad.  If you block with Philistine Priests (5/5) it will negate the OT artifact even though Thaddees is protecting it from ECs with toughness less than 8.  Kinda cool, huh?  I only wish I could figure out how to take meaningful advantage of this loophole.

Actually I am not sure you can target the artifact.  I was under the impression Negate only beats Protect if its is negating the protect itself.  So in your example, wouldn't you be unable to target the artifact for negate and deactivation because of Thad?  If I am wrong I would like to know. 
In AMERICA!!

Offline Josh

  • Trade Count: (+46)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3187
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: So out of curiousity, why does Rob refuse to ban cards?
« Reply #38 on: March 24, 2011, 08:19:53 AM »
0
One interesting side effect of all this is that you can play negates to your hearts content when blocking Thaddeus (unless they target a CBN card). So, say your opponent has an OT artifact active and 8 disciples out when he makes a rescue with Thad.  If you block with Philistine Priests (5/5) it will negate the OT artifact even though Thaddees is protecting it from ECs with toughness less than 8.  Kinda cool, huh?  I only wish I could figure out how to take meaningful advantage of this loophole.
If you had an EC that could negate James the Less' ability, that would kick Thad out of battle (although not stop his ability), leaving you to block a 1/4 hero.  You'd need a CBN/CBP negate on the EC...  Like 12FG and...  I can't think of any others that woudn't be negated by James.

Oh, and Blue Tassels is an OT artifact...  That could be helpful if Thad is in battle  ;)  Only problem is, if James is in battle too...  Philly Priests won't work
If creation sings Your praises so will I
If You gave Your life to love them so will I

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: So out of curiousity, why does Rob refuse to ban cards?
« Reply #39 on: March 24, 2011, 11:13:17 AM »
0
Quote
I was under the impression Negate only beats Protect if its is negating the protect itself.
That impression is incorrect. Protection does nothing against negation ever.
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

Offline Professoralstad

  • Tournament Host, Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+47)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10841
  • Everything is Awesome!
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: So out of curiousity, why does Rob refuse to ban cards?
« Reply #40 on: March 24, 2011, 11:24:36 AM »
0
Quote
I was under the impression Negate only beats Protect if its is negating the protect itself.
That impression is incorrect. Protection does nothing against negation ever.

Correct. Negates don't target cards (even, albeit confusingly, when the ability is "negate a card"), negates only target special abilities. Protecting a card doesn't protect the SA. The only "protection" abilities have from negates are CBN/I/P abilities.
Press 1 for more options.

Offline Korunks

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2271
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: So out of curiousity, why does Rob refuse to ban cards?
« Reply #41 on: March 24, 2011, 11:25:41 AM »
0
Thank you for the correction.  Glad I haven't ruled that wrong at a tournament.
In AMERICA!!

Offline EmJayBee83

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5486
  • Ha! It's funny because the squirrel gets dead.
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • mjb Games
Re: So out of curiousity, why does Rob refuse to ban cards?
« Reply #42 on: March 24, 2011, 11:27:27 AM »
0
Quote
I was under the impression Negate only beats Protect if its is negating the protect itself.
That impression is incorrect. Protection does nothing against negation ever.
Pol is correct.

<interrupt-the-board>
From a meta-game design question all the way to round a discussion of the implications of PoA vs 12FG. Pretty sweet, n'est-ce pas?
</interrupt-the-board>

Oh, and Blue Tassels is an OT artifact...  That could be helpful if Thad is in battle  ;)
Blue Tassels...  D'Oh.   :doh:   How could I have forgotten that?

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal