Author Topic: Site Question (Read 5338 times)

Crashfach2002 · « **Reply #25 on:** September 30, 2010, 01:38:22 PM »

Good enough! Simplicity is normally better!

Master_Chi · « **Reply #26 on:** September 30, 2010, 06:56:31 PM »

From Albert Einstein:

Quote

Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not one bit simpler.

RTSmaniac · « **Reply #27 on:** September 30, 2010, 07:08:14 PM »

I still think this needs to be looked at. These sites are far to strong to just work in territory. If they have to be occupied then it would weaken them considerably. They kill meeting the messiah, habbakak stands watch, grail,jephthah, ET+ AoC, Judges Seat, ect. was this the intent?

Dont get me wrong, the strength of these sites have made players completely drop thier previous decks in search of cards that work better when facing these sites and playing with them. Some players are lost, others are finding new vigor for the game and are playing more than ever. I actually got sick to my stomach and took a week off.

I just want the PTB to make sure they know what thier doing with the increase in piower of these new sites. Game Changing!

Crashfach2002 · « **Reply #28 on:** September 30, 2010, 07:51:41 PM »

I will say that one concern I have, is that instead of searching for new and different ways to combat sites, most people will just use the couple of cards from the new set to stop them. I can see most people just playing Disciples to use Faith as a Mustard Seed to get rid of the site that hurts them the most.

lightningninja · « **Reply #29 on:** September 30, 2010, 07:54:53 PM »

Quote from: RTSmaniac on September 20, 2010, 07:41:32 PM

what do you mean by "hurts site lock"? If anything, one card that hurts site lock would be Fishing Boat! That card killed site lock, man...

Most hilarious thing ever, I was playing a type II side battle deck, and when he'd try to load up his fishing boat, I'd side battle and bring in Emperor Augustus and bring their guys back to territory.

Red Dragon Thorn · « **Reply #30 on:** September 30, 2010, 07:57:49 PM »

In my mind the sites aren't overly strong individually, each one is just pretty good - The problem becomes when you pair any of them with CP, that's when they become a problem.

Prof Underwood · « **Reply #31 on:** September 30, 2010, 09:57:53 PM »

Quote from: RTSmaniac on September 30, 2010, 07:08:14 PM

I just want the PTB to make sure they know what thier doing

OK, then rest assured. The PTB always know exactly what they are doing...except for when we are human and make a mistake, but we are working hard...and are trying their best to make this game the most fun and fellowshippy game it can be

RTSmaniac · « **Reply #32 on:** September 30, 2010, 10:32:00 PM »

nice! Emps for the win. and Nero kills Golgotha. Casting Lots Rock! Herods Temple only helps.

Warrior_Monk · « **Reply #33 on:** September 30, 2010, 10:35:51 PM »

Quote from: RTSmaniac on September 30, 2010, 10:32:00 PM

nice! Emps for the win. and Nero kills Golgotha.

not with CP.

RTSmaniac · « **Reply #34 on:** September 30, 2010, 10:40:11 PM »

Quote from: Prof Underwood on September 30, 2010, 09:57:53 PM

Quote from: RTSmaniac on September 30, 2010, 07:08:14 PM
I just want the PTB to make sure they know what thier doing
OK, then rest assured. The PTB always know exactly what they are doing...except for when we are human and make a mistake, but we are working hard...and are trying their best to make this game the most fun and fellowshippy game it can be

I know sir and here is where i show you where i was working on my pic a little more...

Just Kidding! I know you guys have to take alot from us. Love ya man! Ive been working on that jacket BTW and a little bling for ya!

Prof Underwood · « **Reply #35 on:** October 01, 2010, 12:10:41 AM »

Quote from: RTSmaniac on September 30, 2010, 10:40:11 PM

Love ya man! Ive been working on that jacket BTW and a little bling for ya!

I pity the foo, who tries to take my bling

Minister Polarius · « **Reply #36 on:** October 01, 2010, 12:30:22 AM »

Nero doesn't kill Golgotha, yours or anyone else's. "Roman Site" was ruled to only be sites in Rome proper. If it were every Site in the Roman Empire, that would be every single N.T. Site.

Master_Chi · « **Reply #37 on:** October 01, 2010, 09:06:01 AM »

Quote from: Minister Polarius on October 01, 2010, 12:30:22 AM

Nero doesn't kill Golgotha, yours or anyone else's. "Roman Site" was ruled to only be sites in Rome proper. If it were every Site in the Roman Empire, that would be every single N.T. Site.

That's the whole point....

RTSmaniac · « **Reply #38 on:** October 01, 2010, 09:59:58 AM »

Quote from: Minister Polarius on October 01, 2010, 12:30:22 AM

Nero doesn't kill Golgotha, yours or anyone else's. "Roman Site" was ruled to only be sites in Rome proper. If it were every Site in the Roman Empire, that would be every single N.T. Site.

Can you direct me to that discussion please?

galadgawyn · « **Reply #39 on:** October 02, 2010, 02:08:48 PM »

I like the new sites and I definitely like the new rule for simplicity sake however I do think that the CP was overpowered. There were plenty of ways to deal with the other sites until CP came out.

I just hope that the next set will have a few more ways to negate opponent's site but not make them useless. Like negating opponent's (or just single color) sites if they are not occupied. That keeps the simplicity of the new rule but allows some of the old strategy to be present.

Michael_of_the_Star · « **Reply #40 on:** October 02, 2010, 04:33:18 PM »

But CP only work on sites that are in territory. You can still deal with sites in battle. and now I am currently figuring out ways to deal with a deck with CP. LOL

ML.

lightningninja · « **Reply #41 on:** October 02, 2010, 04:49:14 PM »

Isn't Benedictus like the only way to negate sites?

Confusion on CP for the win!

The Warrior · « **Reply #42 on:** October 02, 2010, 04:55:35 PM »

Quote from: lightningninja on October 02, 2010, 04:49:14 PM

Isn't Benedictus like the only way to negate sites?

Confusion on CP for the win!

lightningninja · « **Reply #43 on:** October 02, 2010, 04:57:31 PM »

Nice! I'm using red now!*

*No I'm not.

That is pretty useful though.... then there is a red enhancement that discards a site, right? Or you can make a battle challenge with Praises or whatever that card is called.

Rawrlolsauce! · « **Reply #44 on:** October 02, 2010, 05:02:57 PM »

A few days ago I was reading Caleb and I was all liek "sw33t! I can steal their CP and then spam Land Dipute during my discard phase!". Then I thought about it and I said "sw33t! I can steal their site and put a LS in it during discard phase* and give it back to them!"

Then I realized CP protects itself so Caleb fails.

*Possible, yet ineffective.

Michael_of_the_Star · « **Reply #45 on:** October 03, 2010, 12:35:30 AM »

But CP is already red, there are a lot of brigade that can't help with red sites. How would other help, I think Benedictus is the only card for teal and white.

ML.

Minister Polarius · « **Reply #46 on:** October 03, 2010, 06:21:39 AM »

Step One: Use Benedictus or Shiny Centurion
Step Two: cause a side-battle
Step Three: control Locust from the Pit
Step Four:

Step Five: Profit.

browarod · « **Reply #47 on:** October 03, 2010, 07:28:22 AM »

Quote from: Minister Polarius on October 03, 2010, 06:21:39 AM

Step One: Use Benedictus or Shiny Centurion
Step Two: cause a side-battle
Step Three: control Locust from the Pit
Step Four:
Step Five: Profit.

The step before Profit is always a tricky one.

RTSmaniac · « **Reply #48 on:** October 03, 2010, 09:56:48 PM »

benedictus and consider the lillies should be enough i would think

Michael_of_the_Star · « **Reply #49 on:** October 04, 2010, 02:15:45 PM »

Quote from: RTSmaniac on October 03, 2010, 09:56:48 PM

benedictus and consider the lillies should be enough i would think

That is a fantastic idea.

News:

Author Topic: Site Question (Read 5338 times)

Warrior_Monk

Rawrlolsauce!

browarod