Author Topic: Site Access  (Read 1343 times)

Offline RedemptionAggie

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+38)
  • *****
  • Posts: 3300
    • -
    • South Central Region
Site Access
« on: June 24, 2009, 09:33:33 PM »
0
King's Daughter (and most access cards pre-3rd Edition):
Character has access to any Site.

Priestly Crown (and several access card post-3rd Edition):
Holder's O.T. male human Heroes have access to all sites.

Do access cards that say "any" grant access to only 1 site?

Offline BubbleBoy

  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8014
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Site Access
« Reply #1 on: June 24, 2009, 10:44:23 PM »
0
That isn't how I've ever played it. It says any site, not any one site.
Use the Mad Bomber to rescue his Province.

Offline RedemptionAggie

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+38)
  • *****
  • Posts: 3300
    • -
    • South Central Region
Re: Site Access
« Reply #2 on: June 24, 2009, 10:46:35 PM »
0
I've never played it that way either, but every other card that says any ("Discard any...", "Capture any...", "Ignore any...", etc.) means one (or whatever number follows any), not all.

Offline SirNobody

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3113
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Site Access
« Reply #3 on: June 24, 2009, 10:53:38 PM »
0
Hey,

"Because gain access abilities are dynamic and only one lost soul can be rescued in each battle anyway, there is no functional difference between gaining access to “any” (one) site and gaining access to “all” (all) sites."

Tschow,

Tim "Sir Nobody" Maly

Offline RedemptionAggie

  • Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+38)
  • *****
  • Posts: 3300
    • -
    • South Central Region
Re: Site Access
« Reply #4 on: June 24, 2009, 10:55:43 PM »
0
Source?  Not questioning it, just can't find it anywhere.
« Last Edit: June 24, 2009, 10:57:56 PM by RedemptionAggie »

Offline SirNobody

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3113
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Site Access
« Reply #5 on: June 25, 2009, 01:10:14 AM »
0
Hey,

Source?

I made it up :D  It's the theory not the statement itself that is significant.  But to answer your question, I pulled the statement from the working draft of the September 2009 REG.

Tschow,

Tim "Sir Nobody" Maly

Offline Cameron the Conqueror

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6586
  • Post # doesn't reflect personal theology. Retired.
    • -
    • Southwest Region
Re: Site Access
« Reply #6 on: June 25, 2009, 01:14:18 AM »
0
Yay for REG update!!!!

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal