Check out our Event Calendar! View birthdays, holidays and upcoming tournaments!
I fail to see how one section of the REG trumps another, other than by fiat. We need to get our house in order as far as rules go. I hate the feeling I get that I am wasting my time trying to keep up with the rules, When I will never be able to remember them all, and they conflict with all the recorded information. I see that section of the REG as an explanation of the section I quoted. I would still rule those cards as I stated above. Call me stubborn (or any other thing you want) but I am going to stick to my guns untill we get this resolved.
Quote from: browarod on November 10, 2010, 02:19:53 PMMaybe they should just raise the LS requirement to win for T1 to 6 LS instead of 5. That way SoG/NJ only gets you 33% towards winning rather than 40%.I've been a big proponent of that for years, but it would require making T1 decks be a minimum of 60 cards and 8 LS.
Maybe they should just raise the LS requirement to win for T1 to 6 LS instead of 5. That way SoG/NJ only gets you 33% towards winning rather than 40%.
Imho, Disciples did more to completely destroy certain deck-types than simply to reduce their usefulness. In card games it's always better to have diversity in competitive types than to make a type just to kill it in a later set. I would have rather seen theme-specific counters to certain things than across-the-board shutdown counters like the Di sites.
Now you're just being silly.
The Glossary is missing a few words. Is it an error? Yes.
Does it mean that hosts get to go rogue and rule however they want even though an Elder has told them otherwise? No.
I believe you misunderstand me. I am going to stick to my guns by saying we need to clean up our rules.
Quote from: Korunks on November 10, 2010, 06:15:54 PMI believe you misunderstand me. I am going to stick to my guns by saying we need to clean up our rules. LOL. I did indeed misunderstand you. I saw the strands of gray hair suddenly develop on your head and thought..... ROGUE! FWIW, I agree that the REG needs to be updated, and a new rulebook would be nice. Don't believe the DaNewreg Code.
Newregs can't cheeseforce |>