Author Topic: SI  (Read 2962 times)

Offline The Guardian

  • Playtester, Redemption Elder
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+96)
  • *****
  • Posts: 12344
  • The Stars are coming out...
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: SI
« Reply #25 on: June 22, 2016, 11:37:56 AM »
0
Perhaps because of the way the entry for SI was written, this is now the case. However, I know that was not the original intent. I distinctly recall Bryon saying that SI was not intended to give a player infinite initiative.
Fortress Alstad
Have you checked the REG?
Have you looked it up in ORCID?

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: SI
« Reply #26 on: June 22, 2016, 11:49:40 AM »
+1
This question has come up so many times I can argue either side's best points in my sleep. I favor the status quo, as the closer the definition of SI gets to "when all your character are removed from battle by an opponent, you may play or activate a card that could negate the ability causing the removal" the better.
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal