Author Topic: Hero(d)-mans? (Read 10472 times)

Chronic Apathy · « **Reply #75 on:** May 22, 2011, 01:23:39 AM »

Quote from: RTSmaniac on May 22, 2011, 01:09:57 AM

Quote
and I think I have a good idea of the main bullet points that both sides are presenting

So how do you feel about Herod the Great considered a Roman govenor Chronic?

I can't tell if I'm being made fun of or not. =(

I think Herod the Great should be considered a Roman governor, though it's reasonable for the Elders to request more proof before making a decision about it. I think requesting three or four sources is a bit ridiculous though.

RTSmaniac · « **Reply #76 on:** May 22, 2011, 01:43:11 AM »

Its so hard to relay true intent on such a medium sometimes...I wasnt making fun.

Chronic Apathy · « **Reply #77 on:** April 03, 2012, 09:30:40 PM »

Quote

Warning: this topic has not been posted in for at least 14 days.
Unless you're sure you want to reply, please consider starting a new topic.

How long has this warning been here for? I've never necro-posted here, but is it a new feature?

At any rate, I want to bump this up because we never actually got an answer on the "Herod the Great being considered a Governor" thing, and I'd like to know it one way or the other.

Praeceps · « **Reply #78 on:** April 04, 2012, 12:51:59 AM »

The Herod's were territorial Kings, not Governors. Just look to the verse at the bottom of Herod Philip II: Luke 3:1. It references Herod being tetrarch (king) of Galilee and Pilate as being the Governor of Judea. They are clearly on two different levels as Pilate was held above the Herods.

Of course, this still doesn't resolve Herod the Great...

Cactus Game Design Message Boards

News:

Author Topic: Hero(d)-mans? (Read 10472 times)

Chronic Apathy

Re: Hero(d)-mans?

RTSmaniac

Re: Hero(d)-mans?

Chronic Apathy

Re: Hero(d)-mans?

Praeceps

Re: Hero(d)-mans?