New Redemption Grab Bag now includes an assortment of 500 cards from five (5) different expansion sets. Available at Cactus website.
If a character is forced to withdraw (e.g., Darkness (Warriors)) or withdraws from a battle voluntarily (e.g., Highway), it may not re-enter the current battle (see Withdraw in the glossary of the rulebook [p. 54]). Moreover, the character may enter on a new battle on the same turn (e.g., The Long Day).
You'll buy that...? That is not how it was ruled. It is ruled that if a character is shuffled back into your deck or put on top of your deck or ANYWHERE in your deck it is reset, and can re-enter battle. The Long Day is different because it was never reset that is a different scenario. You could get shuffled and use Unknown Nation to get back the SAME EC that was just in battle. If a character touches your deck it is reset and can re-enter battle. And to add more fuel to the fire I think it was ruled that if a character gets sent to your hand it is also reset and thus can enter battle again.
I know that it was ruled you cannot pull the same unique character back into battle with Unknown Nation after Plague of Frogs, since I guess its presence is forever time-stamped in battle, or something to that effect. But isn't it difficult to rule the same for generic characters?Kirk
FWIW, if a hero withdraws from battle after playing The Long Day, the REG currently says that that hero can start the new battle. Has that been changed?
I remember very well that it was ruled that you cannot use Unknown Nation to search for a unique EC after it got shuffled while blocking.
I was the one who said it should not be allowed, and Bryon agreed with me. I'm not sure if that was one of the threads that got lost in the purge.
QuoteFWIW, if a hero withdraws from battle after playing The Long Day, the REG currently says that that hero can start the new battle. Has that been changed?There have been several long discussion in which The Long Day has been brought up. The consensus was that "moreover" implies a clarification, rather than an exception, and that the word "not" was probably missing from the at statement. Schaef and Bryon agreed that this should be the case, but nothing official was ever decided. I think it needs to be decided before nationals.One thread: http://www.cactusgamedesign.com/message_boards/index.php?topic=15409.msg240878#msg240878The other: http://www.cactusgamedesign.com/message_boards/index.php?topic=14901.msg233537#msg233537Kirk