Cactus Web Site special offer: Orders over $75 will receive a free Angel of God 2023 National Promo card while supplies last.
N.T.‘N.T.’ is an acronym for ‘New Testament’. The following 27 books are considered part of the NewTestament: Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Acts, Romans, I Corithians, II Corinthians, Galatians, Ephesians,Philippians, Colossians, I Thessolonians, II Thessolonians, I Timothy, II Timothy, Titus,Philemon, Hebrews, James, I Peter, II Peter, I John, II John, III John, Jude, and Revelation.Cards with a reference from those books are N.T cards. Additionally, cards with ahistorical reference from Josephus from a time after the birth of Christ are consideredN.T. cards.O.T.‘O.T.’ is an acronym for ‘Old Testament’. The following 39 books are considered part of the OldTestament: Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers, Deuteronomy, Joshua, Judges, Ruth, I Samuel, IISamuel, I Kings, II Kings, I Chronicles, II Chronicles, Ezra, Nehemiah, Esther, Job, Psalms,Proverbs, Ecclesiastes, Song of Solomon, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Lamentations, Ezekiel, Daniel,Hosea, Joel, Amos, Obadiah, Jonah, Micah, Nahum, Habakkuk, Zephaniah, Haggai,Zechariah, and Malachi. Cards with a reference from those books are O.T. cards.Additionally, cards with a historical reference from Josephus from a time before thebirth of Christ are considered O.T. cards.
No, Josephus is not an "NT Reference" book.Characters with a reference from Josephus are categorized based on their existence in relation to the birth of Christ. Antiochus is an OT character who happens to be referenced in Josephus
I believe the question wasn't whether she is NT, but whether her return would trigger.Holy Spirit says "enters battle". While it cannot trigger in-between abilities, it's ability has been triggered. Even if she withdraws, you can still search for a fruit based on her entering, yes.To the question of Josephus, that is considered NT for testament purposes.
Here's a question: Is Antiochus IV Epiphanes a NT hero because his reference is from Josephus or does the NT begin as soon as Malachai ends?
Quote from: Drrek on April 30, 2015, 04:55:58 PMQuote from: Redoubter on April 30, 2015, 04:51:09 PMTo the question of Josephus, that is considered NT for testament purposes.Except for Antiochus IV EpiphanesOh right it's that guy we're talking about...always forget about him. His identifier specifies that he is OT, which overrides normal testament rules.
Quote from: Redoubter on April 30, 2015, 04:51:09 PMTo the question of Josephus, that is considered NT for testament purposes.Except for Antiochus IV Epiphanes
To the question of Josephus, that is considered NT for testament purposes.
That was just back in April. So is this a recent change or were you just slightly off back then? (not meant to be a criticism)
