« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Down

Author Topic: Saul/Paul not a priest?!?!  (Read 5927 times)

Offline TimMierz

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4047
  • I can't stop crying. Buckets of tears.
    • -
    • Northeast Region
    • Tim's Photos
Re: Saul/Paul not a priest?!?!
« Reply #25 on: August 26, 2009, 04:42:18 PM »
0
I would suggest removing "teacher" as an identifier since it's part of the title, but then we'd have a discussion whether it's just a metaphorical teacher and whether we can use a special "by design" situation to still call it a teacher.
Logged
Get Simply Adorable Slugfest at https://www.thegamecrafter.com/games/simply-adorable-slugfest

drb1200

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Saul/Paul not a priest?!?!
« Reply #26 on: August 26, 2009, 05:02:31 PM »
0
Quote from: Kyp Henderson on August 25, 2009, 11:25:37 PM
That makes no sense?!?!  Just because they were evil doesn't mean they weren't priests! They were the false priests of the bible.  I think that needs to be changed, they still did all the offerings and were considered priests in their day.
Whoa, since when are the Pharisees evil?
Logged

Offline Cameron the Conqueror

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6586
  • Post # doesn't reflect personal theology. Retired.
    • -
    • Southwest Region
Re: Saul/Paul not a priest?!?!
« Reply #27 on: August 26, 2009, 05:04:02 PM »
0
Quote from: drb1200 on August 26, 2009, 05:02:31 PM
Quote from: Kyp Henderson on August 25, 2009, 11:25:37 PM
That makes no sense?!?!  Just because they were evil doesn't mean they weren't priests! They were the false priests of the bible.  I think that needs to be changed, they still did all the offerings and were considered priests in their day.
Whoa, since when are the Pharisees evil?
since the Apostles booster pack, when they were printed?
Logged

drb1200

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Saul/Paul not a priest?!?!
« Reply #28 on: August 26, 2009, 05:06:07 PM »
0
I really hate how Redemption depicts all the Pharisees as evil. That isn't right.
Logged

The Schaef

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Saul/Paul not a priest?!?!
« Reply #29 on: August 26, 2009, 05:09:44 PM »
0
not-evil Pharisees in Redemption:
Gamaliel
Nicodemus
converted Paul

Joseph of Arimathea could very well have been a member of the Sanhedrin, but because we have no specific documentation saying he is either a Pharisee or a Sadducee, he gets no label.
Logged

Offline Cameron the Conqueror

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6586
  • Post # doesn't reflect personal theology. Retired.
    • -
    • Southwest Region
Re: Saul/Paul not a priest?!?!
« Reply #30 on: August 26, 2009, 05:11:30 PM »
0
They did deny Christ and therefore God.....  I understand what you mean though; not every Pharisee was evil.


The card Greek Scholars doesn't mean that every single Greek that was a scholar was evil.  A card can represent a viewpoint, and the Pharisee viewpoint that Christ =/= God is fair to make them an evil character IMO.
Logged

The Schaef

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Saul/Paul not a priest?!?!
« Reply #31 on: August 26, 2009, 05:14:44 PM »
0
Also, just as gray is the murky middle between black and white, the NT gray characters thematically are people that were "neither hot nor cold".  God said of lukewarm people that he would "spew them out of his mouth".  No side to Him seems to be as bad as - if not worse than - defying Him.
Logged

Offline golgotha

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 399
  • The Mohawk of Rawk
Re: Saul/Paul not a priest?!?!
« Reply #32 on: August 26, 2009, 06:04:16 PM »
0
So this thread kinda got me thinking a bit. My understanding of things may be a little off, and I may be oversimplifying things. I know we have a few NT Priests, Priests in Christ and Zachariah come to mind, but is there any "Post Ressurection Priests" and do we really need them?
Logged
Good Ole Golgotha

Offline Cameron the Conqueror

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6586
  • Post # doesn't reflect personal theology. Retired.
    • -
    • Southwest Region
Re: Saul/Paul not a priest?!?!
« Reply #33 on: August 26, 2009, 06:11:07 PM »
0
Quote from: golgotha on August 26, 2009, 06:04:16 PM
So this thread kinda got me thinking a bit. My understanding of things may be a little off, and I may be oversimplifying things. I know we have a few NT Priests, Priests in Christ and Zachariah come to mind, but is there any "Post Ressurection Priests" and do we really need them?

Yes, teal needs all the lost soul access it can get.  It hard enough getting the Female Only ls.......
Logged

Lamborghini_diablo

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Saul/Paul not a priest?!?!
« Reply #34 on: August 26, 2009, 06:15:10 PM »
0
No, they dont need special access to those two souls. They are powerful, so that is a drawback you have to consider.
Logged

Offline Cameron the Conqueror

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6586
  • Post # doesn't reflect personal theology. Retired.
    • -
    • Southwest Region
Re: Saul/Paul not a priest?!?!
« Reply #35 on: August 26, 2009, 06:20:08 PM »
0
Quote from: Lamborghini_diablo on August 26, 2009, 06:15:10 PM
No, they dont need special access to those two souls. They are powerful, so that is a drawback you have to consider.

I was more joking....  Forgot to add the smiley  ::)
Logged

Offline Gabe

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+69)
  • *****
  • Posts: 10675
  • From Moses to the prophets, it's all about Him!
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Land of Redemption
Re: Saul/Paul not a priest?!?!
« Reply #36 on: August 26, 2009, 07:14:05 PM »
0
While we're talking about exceptions to being a Levitical priest, please don't forget about good ol' Saint Patrick.  I don't want to see him become green with envy.
Logged
Have you visited the Land of Redemption today?

Offline Kyp Henderson

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 301
    • -
    • Southwest Region
Re: Saul/Paul not a priest?!?!
« Reply #37 on: August 26, 2009, 09:32:59 PM »
0
ok Thanks for clearing this up. It just seemed to me like he would be a priest because he was a Pharisee but now I know they are not.  But hopefully the evil High priests are considered evil priests. :)
Logged
Don't buy Angel Wars!

browarod

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Saul/Paul not a priest?!?!
« Reply #38 on: August 26, 2009, 11:38:21 PM »
0
Quote from: Kyp Henderson on August 26, 2009, 09:32:59 PM
But hopefully the evil High priests are considered evil priests. :)
Quote from: browarod on August 25, 2009, 11:31:15 PM
Quote from: REG
(Evil): Abihu, Amaziah, the Ungodly Priest, False Priests, High Priest Ananias, High Priest Annas, High Priest Caiaphas, Hophni, son of Eli, Nadab, Pagan Priest, Pashhur the Priest, Philistine Priests, Phinehas, son of Eli, Potiphera, Priest of On, Unfaithful Priests, and Urijah the High Priest
Logged

Offline Kyp Henderson

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 301
    • -
    • Southwest Region
Re: Saul/Paul not a priest?!?!
« Reply #39 on: August 26, 2009, 11:56:32 PM »
0
lol I was joking.
Logged
Don't buy Angel Wars!
Pages: 1 [2]  All   Go Up
« previous next »
 
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal