Author Topic: Saint Patrick - a prohphet?  (Read 30319 times)

Offline D-man

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 961
Re: Saint Patrick - a prohphet?
« Reply #125 on: July 23, 2009, 05:46:41 PM »
0
Ok, got it.  Thanks. :)

Offline Colin Michael

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3636
Re: Saint Patrick - a prohphet?
« Reply #126 on: July 24, 2009, 12:59:23 PM »
0
Essentially, O.T. = B.C.E. N.T. = C.E. By that, Judas Maccabees would be O.T.
αθαvαTOι θvηTOι θvηTOι αθαvαTOι ζwvTεs TOv εKειvwv θαvαTov Tov δε εKεivwv βιOv TεθvεwTεs -Heraclitus

FresnoRedemption

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Saint Patrick - a prohphet?
« Reply #127 on: July 24, 2009, 02:15:20 PM »
0
Essentially, O.T. = B.C.E. N.T. = C.E. By that, Judas Maccabees would be O.T.

Or O.T. = B.C., N.T. = A.D.

Offline Colin Michael

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3636
Re: Saint Patrick - a prohphet?
« Reply #128 on: July 24, 2009, 04:04:42 PM »
0
Essentially, O.T. = B.C.E. N.T. = C.E. By that, Judas Maccabees would be O.T.

Or O.T. = B.C., N.T. = A.D.
No. It's definitely not an "or".
αθαvαTOι θvηTOι θvηTOι αθαvαTOι ζwvTεs TOv εKειvwv θαvαTov Tov δε εKεivwv βιOv TεθvεwTεs -Heraclitus

Offline Korunks

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2271
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Saint Patrick - a prohphet?
« Reply #129 on: July 24, 2009, 04:07:11 PM »
0
Actually it is an or, B.C.E. only came into use extensively in recent years, it was B.C. and A.D. for a very long time before that.
In AMERICA!!

FresnoRedemption

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Saint Patrick - a prohphet?
« Reply #130 on: July 24, 2009, 04:16:06 PM »
0
Actually it is an or, B.C.E. only came into use extensively in recent years, it was B.C. and A.D. for a very long time before that.

B.C.E. ("before common era") and C.E. ("common era") was instituted by liberals who want to remove all mention of Christ from our lives. This doesn't even make any sense, considering that "A.D." and "B.C." were set by the very appearance of Christ. The only reason it's not perfect is because the guy (I forget his name off the top of my head) who set the timeline as we know it now, his math was a little off. But B.C. ("before christ") and A.D. ("Anno Domini" (in the year of our Lord)) should most definitely be used for the time periods.

Offline Colin Michael

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3636
Re: Saint Patrick - a prohphet?
« Reply #131 on: July 24, 2009, 04:23:28 PM »
0
Actually it is an or, B.C.E. only came into use extensively in recent years, it was B.C. and A.D. for a very long time before that.
It's an "and".
Actually it is an or, B.C.E. only came into use extensively in recent years, it was B.C. and A.D. for a very long time before that.

B.C.E. ("before common era") and C.E. ("common era") was instituted by liberals who want to remove all mention of Christ from our lives. This doesn't even make any sense, considering that "A.D." and "B.C." were set by the very appearance of Christ. The only reason it's not perfect is because the guy (I forget his name off the top of my head) who set the timeline as we know it now, his math was a little off. But B.C. ("before christ") and A.D. ("Anno Domini" (in the year of our Lord)) should most definitely be used for the time periods.
Yes, it's extremely important to force our way of thinking on to everyone else. That's the best way to save the lost.
« Last Edit: July 24, 2009, 04:27:40 PM by Colin Michael »
αθαvαTOι θvηTOι θvηTOι αθαvαTOι ζwvTεs TOv εKειvwv θαvαTov Tov δε εKεivwv βιOv TεθvεwTεs -Heraclitus

Offline Korunks

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2271
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Saint Patrick - a prohphet?
« Reply #132 on: July 24, 2009, 04:34:08 PM »
0
Either way his point still stands, it can be an "or", it doesn't have to be an "and".
In AMERICA!!

Offline Colin Michael

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3636
Re: Saint Patrick - a prohphet?
« Reply #133 on: July 24, 2009, 04:41:44 PM »
0
Either way his point still stands, it can be an "or", it doesn't have to be an "and".
It has to be an "and".
αθαvαTOι θvηTOι θvηTOι αθαvαTOι ζwvTεs TOv εKειvwv θαvαTov Tov δε εKεivwv βιOv TεθvεwTεs -Heraclitus

FresnoRedemption

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Saint Patrick - a prohphet?
« Reply #134 on: July 24, 2009, 04:47:44 PM »
0
Either way his point still stands, it can be an "or", it doesn't have to be an "and".
It has to be an "and".

There's no reason to use "B.C.E." and "C.E." I certainly don't recognize them. Using A.D. and B.C. is not forcing our beliefs on anyone. After all, we have used this calendar for a long time. It's all a part of a liberal plot, the same people who want to remove the use of "under God" from the pledge of allegiance or the Ten Commandments from courts. We must be a country that serves God, or this country will come under judgment (some believe it already has, and will only get worse). Look at Jerusalem.

Offline Professoralstad

  • Tournament Host, Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+47)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10841
  • Everything is Awesome!
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Saint Patrick - a prohphet?
« Reply #135 on: July 24, 2009, 04:52:05 PM »
0
FWIW, 'or' is only inappropriate if one of the choices is false. A.D and B.C.E are commonly accepted, so 'or' is definitely an option. If it's 'and', all our dates this year should read: 2009 A.D.C.E. Which just seems silly to me.

And while I don't really care if people insist on using B.C.E and C.E instead of the traditional ones, I think it's a bit strange. I guess Jesus is somewhere on the importance spectrum between dividing the two main eras of human history, and Lord.

And with that, I think this thread has served its purpose. There is now a new (not to mention more useful than Agabus) green N.T. Prophet, who is also a Priest. Rob has made it official, and Prophets deck users may rejoice. And this thread should be locked so that it can rest peacefully in the annals of the Ruling Questions for all time.
Press 1 for more options.

Offline Colin Michael

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3636
Re: Saint Patrick - a prohphet?
« Reply #136 on: July 24, 2009, 04:55:13 PM »
0
Either way his point still stands, it can be an "or", it doesn't have to be an "and".
It has to be an "and".

There's no reason to use "B.C.E." and "C.E." I certainly don't recognize them. Using A.D. and B.C. is not forcing our beliefs on anyone. After all, we have used this calendar for a long time. It's all a part of a liberal plot, the same people who want to remove the use of "under God" from the pledge of allegiance or the Ten Commandments from courts. We must be a country that serves God, or this country will come under judgment (some believe it already has, and will only get worse). Look at Jerusalem.
You're somewhat crazy and over paranoid. I'd love to debate you on AIM sometime.
αθαvαTOι θvηTOι θvηTOι αθαvαTOι ζwvTεs TOv εKειvwv θαvαTov Tov δε εKεivwv βιOv TεθvεwTεs -Heraclitus

FresnoRedemption

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Saint Patrick - a prohphet?
« Reply #137 on: July 24, 2009, 04:56:14 PM »
0
So the official ruling is that Saint Patrick is a prophet?

FresnoRedemption

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Saint Patrick - a prohphet?
« Reply #138 on: July 24, 2009, 04:56:45 PM »
0
Either way his point still stands, it can be an "or", it doesn't have to be an "and".
It has to be an "and".

There's no reason to use "B.C.E." and "C.E." I certainly don't recognize them. Using A.D. and B.C. is not forcing our beliefs on anyone. After all, we have used this calendar for a long time. It's all a part of a liberal plot, the same people who want to remove the use of "under God" from the pledge of allegiance or the Ten Commandments from courts. We must be a country that serves God, or this country will come under judgment (some believe it already has, and will only get worse). Look at Jerusalem.
You're somewhat crazy and over paranoid. I'd love to debate you on AIM sometime.

I'm hoping that was meant in a spirit of love. :p

Offline Colin Michael

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3636
Re: Saint Patrick - a prohphet?
« Reply #139 on: July 24, 2009, 04:59:19 PM »
0
Either way his point still stands, it can be an "or", it doesn't have to be an "and".
It has to be an "and".

There's no reason to use "B.C.E." and "C.E." I certainly don't recognize them. Using A.D. and B.C. is not forcing our beliefs on anyone. After all, we have used this calendar for a long time. It's all a part of a liberal plot, the same people who want to remove the use of "under God" from the pledge of allegiance or the Ten Commandments from courts. We must be a country that serves God, or this country will come under judgment (some believe it already has, and will only get worse). Look at Jerusalem.
You're somewhat crazy and over paranoid. I'd love to debate you on AIM sometime.

I'm hoping that was meant in a spirit of love. :p
Most definitely. For serious though, AIM me up sometime.
αθαvαTOι θvηTOι θvηTOι αθαvαTOι ζwvTεs TOv εKειvwv θαvαTov Tov δε εKεivwv βιOv TεθvεwTεs -Heraclitus

Offline Professoralstad

  • Tournament Host, Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+47)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10841
  • Everything is Awesome!
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Saint Patrick - a prohphet?
« Reply #140 on: July 24, 2009, 05:00:49 PM »
0
So the official ruling is that Saint Patrick is a prophet?

Saint Patrick is a Prophet because his dreams foretold the future which did come true.
Press 1 for more options.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal