Author Topic: Rumor?  (Read 1974 times)

Offline CountFount

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+23)
  • *****
  • Posts: 1127
  • I'll be your Huckleberry
    • -
    • North Central Region
Rumor?
« on: November 12, 2009, 10:53:18 AM »
0
Is there a recently instituted new rule in either category of play regarding the number of cards that one can hold in their hand at a time? Or is this just a Rumor? If there is a 'serious' thread discussing this issue I would like to read it.

Thanks
Now that we're a family, I can be the ulll-timate DAD.

Offline soul seeker

  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3011
  • I find your lack of faith disturbing.
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Rumor?
« Reply #1 on: November 12, 2009, 10:57:15 AM »
0
yep, you can not have more than 16 cards in your hand at any one time...per Rob Anderson.  It is no rumor.
noob with a medal

Offline CountFount

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+23)
  • *****
  • Posts: 1127
  • I'll be your Huckleberry
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Rumor?
« Reply #2 on: November 12, 2009, 10:58:59 AM »
0
Where is the thread or the ruling in the REG? Not questioning you, I just need to have some documentation to show play group.
Now that we're a family, I can be the ulll-timate DAD.

Offline soul seeker

  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3011
  • I find your lack of faith disturbing.
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Rumor?
« Reply #3 on: November 12, 2009, 11:00:53 AM »
0
It is number 8 in this thread....I was just looking for it:

Re: Rule Changes, experiments and tournament host guide updates by CactusRob

It is in the tournament rules section.
noob with a medal

browarod

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Rumor?
« Reply #4 on: November 12, 2009, 11:01:13 AM »
0
The maximum you can hold at once in your hand is 16 (or 20 with Tables of the Law active).

*instaposted*

Offline Ken4Christ4ever

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+64)
  • *****
  • Posts: 1751
  • Three Lions Gaming + Goodruby Christian Bookstore
    • -
    • Southwest Region
    • Three Lions Gaming
Re: Rumor?
« Reply #5 on: November 12, 2009, 11:01:28 AM »
0

Offline CountFount

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+23)
  • *****
  • Posts: 1127
  • I'll be your Huckleberry
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Rumor?
« Reply #6 on: November 12, 2009, 11:07:18 AM »
0
Thanks a bunch guys.
Now that we're a family, I can be the ulll-timate DAD.

Offline BubbleBoy

  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8014
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Rumor?
« Reply #7 on: November 12, 2009, 12:09:56 PM »
0
(or 20 with Tables of the Law active)
That was never decided upon.
Use the Mad Bomber to rescue his Province.

browarod

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Rumor?
« Reply #8 on: November 12, 2009, 02:32:09 PM »
0
(or 20 with Tables of the Law active)
That was never decided upon.
That's what I was told by Ken at the last tourney he hosted, so that's what I thought the ruling was....

Offline Master KChief

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6963
  • Greatness, at any cost.
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • GameStop
Re: Rumor?
« Reply #9 on: November 12, 2009, 05:45:43 PM »
0
i dont see any correlation between the new ruling and tables of the law.
"If it weren't for people with bad decision making skills, I'd have to get a real job." - Reynad

Offline SirNobody

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3113
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Rumor?
« Reply #10 on: November 12, 2009, 08:27:03 PM »
0
Hey,

When the rule was being discussed at nationals having it influenced by Tables of the Law was considered, but Rob decided against it.  The hand limit is 16 always.  Tables of the Law and Death and Hades do not affect that.

Tschow,

Tim "Sir Nobody" Maly

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal