Author Topic: Revealer vs. J-Tower  (Read 3630 times)

Offline EmJayBee83

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5486
  • Ha! It's funny because the squirrel gets dead.
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • mjb Games
Revealer vs. J-Tower
« on: July 20, 2009, 02:09:32 AM »
0
Here is the scenario...

I have Jerusalem Tower active, and my opponent draws the Revealer. What happens to any LS that are revealed?

Jerusalem Tower  Play As  All opponents are prevented from removing cards from holder’s draw pile. Draw pile may still be searched, revealed, and/or shuffled.

Revealer LS  SA  When you draw this card, each opponent must reveal the top two cards of his draw pile. Place each revealed Lost Soul in owner's Land of Bondage. Place the rest beneath owner's draw pile.

Offline The Guardian

  • Playtester, Redemption Elder
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+96)
  • *****
  • Posts: 12344
  • The Stars are coming out...
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Revealer vs. J-Tower
« Reply #1 on: July 20, 2009, 02:10:24 AM »
0
This was decided upon a long time ago...I wish I remember which way it was ruled... :P
Fortress Alstad
Have you checked the REG?
Have you looked it up in ORCID?

Offline Red Dragon Thorn

  • Covenant Games
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5373
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Covenant Games
Re: Revealer vs. J-Tower
« Reply #2 on: July 20, 2009, 02:10:32 AM »
0
I believe that the ruling is that it goes beneath with the card, but I think that thread was lost in the purge...
www.covenantgames.com

Offline sk

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4028
  • I am a leaf on the wind.
    • -
    • Southwest Region
    • My Facebook
Re: Revealer vs. J-Tower
« Reply #3 on: July 20, 2009, 03:17:38 AM »
0
Yeah, I don't remember being surprised by the result, so I'm pretty sure it was ruled as RDT said.
"I'm not cheating, I'm just awesome." - Luke Wolfe

Offline Prof Underwood

  • Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8597
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: Revealer vs. J-Tower
« Reply #4 on: July 20, 2009, 03:41:07 AM »
0
Your J-tower would keep me ("all opponents") from removing the LS from your deck.  But my Revealer doesn't try to make ME remove the LS from your deck.  Instead it makes YOU ("opponent") remove your LS from your own deck.  And since J-Tower doesn't protect you from yourself, I think that the Revealer would still work as normal.

Offline Red Dragon Thorn

  • Covenant Games
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5373
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Covenant Games
Re: Revealer vs. J-Tower
« Reply #5 on: July 20, 2009, 03:45:37 AM »
0
I disagree,
The Revealer is the card causing the removal, since the Revealer is my card, I am causing the removal.
www.covenantgames.com

The Schaef

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Revealer vs. J-Tower
« Reply #6 on: July 20, 2009, 07:08:44 AM »
0
Non-LS revealed cards go to bottom of deck.

Revealed LS cannot be removed from deck per J-Tower's ability, so like other revealed cards to which no other ability applies, they go back where they came from: the top of the deck.

Offline BubbleBoy

  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8014
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Revealer vs. J-Tower
« Reply #7 on: July 20, 2009, 10:19:46 AM »
0
Oh, I thought I would be so smart by saying what Schaef just said...too bad he already said it. :-\ I guess I'll just agree then. ...
Use the Mad Bomber to rescue his Province.

Lamborghini_diablo

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Revealer vs. J-Tower
« Reply #8 on: July 20, 2009, 11:17:41 AM »
0
Non-LS revealed cards go to bottom of deck.

Revealed LS cannot be removed from deck per J-Tower's ability, so like other revealed cards to which no other ability applies, they go back where they came from: the top of the deck.

Must..... find...... way....... to abuse this!

Offline Cameron the Conqueror

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6586
  • Post # doesn't reflect personal theology. Retired.
    • -
    • Southwest Region
Re: Revealer vs. J-Tower
« Reply #9 on: July 20, 2009, 11:26:05 AM »
0
Jephthah :)

Offline EmJayBee83

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5486
  • Ha! It's funny because the squirrel gets dead.
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • mjb Games
Re: Revealer vs. J-Tower
« Reply #10 on: July 20, 2009, 11:52:39 AM »
0
Non-LS revealed cards go to bottom of deck.

Revealed LS cannot be removed from deck per J-Tower's ability, so like other revealed cards to which no other ability applies, they go back where they came from: the top of the deck.

I never should have let Prof Underwood talk me out of my original ruling.  Drat the Prof with his silver tongue and Jedi-like powers of persuasion.  :D
« Last Edit: July 20, 2009, 12:16:19 PM by EmJayBee83 »

The Schaef

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Revealer vs. J-Tower
« Reply #11 on: July 20, 2009, 12:02:08 PM »
0
Must..... find...... way....... to abuse this!

It does push LS to the top (granted they were already in the top two cards), and push other cards to the bottom, so even that is at least something.

Chronic Apathy

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Revealer vs. J-Tower
« Reply #12 on: July 20, 2009, 12:31:12 PM »
0
Non-LS revealed cards go to bottom of deck.

Revealed LS cannot be removed from deck per J-Tower's ability, so like other revealed cards to which no other ability applies, they go back where they came from: the top of the deck.

I never should have let Prof Underwood talk me out of my original ruling.  Drat the Prof with his silver tongue and Jedi-like powers of persuasion.  :D

These are not the souls you're looking for...

Offline The Guardian

  • Playtester, Redemption Elder
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+96)
  • *****
  • Posts: 12344
  • The Stars are coming out...
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Revealer vs. J-Tower
« Reply #13 on: July 20, 2009, 01:03:45 PM »
0
Non-LS revealed cards go to bottom of deck.

Revealed LS cannot be removed from deck per J-Tower's ability, so like other revealed cards to which no other ability applies, they go back where they came from: the top of the deck.

Oh rats, I almost posted that answer last night, but I questioned my powers of memory and went with the "I knew it and forgot it" response...  :P
Fortress Alstad
Have you checked the REG?
Have you looked it up in ORCID?

Lamborghini_diablo

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Revealer vs. J-Tower
« Reply #14 on: July 20, 2009, 01:13:40 PM »
0
Jephthah :)

That and Evil Spawn... but those are too obvious.  ;)

Offline Prof Underwood

  • Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8597
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: Revealer vs. J-Tower
« Reply #15 on: July 20, 2009, 04:05:27 PM »
0
I never should have let Prof Underwood talk me out of my original ruling.  Drat the Prof with his silver tongue and Jedi-like powers of persuasion.  :D
I was totally going to say something witty like...
These are not the souls you're looking for...
But Chronic beat me to it :)

I still think that J-Tower is protecting against actions by one player and Revealer is causing actions by a different player, therefore they don't seem to contradict.

The Schaef

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Revealer vs. J-Tower
« Reply #16 on: July 20, 2009, 06:44:58 PM »
0
That's not how it works.  The ability on the card means that the player is taking the action, not his targeted opponent.

That is the reasoning behind the "Dove" ruling, that Dove cannot discard an immune character like Red Dragon, supposing that the opponent, not the human Hero, is doing the discarding.  The card is what carries out the effect, the opponent is, in the case of J Tower, the person playing the discard ability, and in the case of Dove, the person who chooses the card to target.  This was also the genesis of the mostly-true-but-with-unrecognized-exceptions rule that cards, not players, are the targets of abilities.

Offline Prof Underwood

  • Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8597
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: Revealer vs. J-Tower
« Reply #17 on: July 20, 2009, 10:21:47 PM »
0
OK, this clearly seems to have already been decided one way, and it's not a windmill that I care enough to fight :)

The Schaef

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Revealer vs. J-Tower
« Reply #18 on: July 20, 2009, 11:28:11 PM »
0
Having the card ability also decide who is doing the physical act of discarding is just one more layer of complexity the game doesn't need.  I think you'll agree it would only cause more vagaries.

Offline Prof Underwood

  • Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+7)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8597
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: Revealer vs. J-Tower
« Reply #19 on: July 21, 2009, 10:11:12 AM »
0
Having the card ability also decide who is doing the physical act of discarding is just one more layer of complexity the game doesn't need.  I think you'll agree it would only cause more vagaries.
I agree it would cause more vagaries.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal