Author Topic: RBD vs. JT  (Read 2639 times)

Offline BubbleBoy

  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 8014
    • -
    • North Central Region
RBD vs. JT
« on: September 14, 2010, 10:34:09 PM »
0
Where are the cards revealed by Rain Becomes Dust when they are revealed? Are they in hand or in deck? If in deck, then Jerusalem Tower will protect them from being revealed and discarded, right?

Maybe we need to sort out how "instead" works before this can be answered?
Use the Mad Bomber to rescue his Province.

browarod

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: RBD vs. JT
« Reply #1 on: September 15, 2010, 12:00:17 AM »
0
There was a ruling similar to this, though I forget what about, and I think it was ruled that the cards would be revealed and then returned to deck.

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: RBD vs. JT
« Reply #2 on: September 15, 2010, 12:36:24 AM »
0
Looks like, since they haven't been drawn yet, they're still in the draw pile.
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

Rawrlolsauce!

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: RBD vs. JT
« Reply #3 on: September 15, 2010, 12:37:25 AM »
0
Revealing doesn't change the location. I'm too lazy to look up JT's SA so I'm not going to comment any further.

Offline Professoralstad

  • Tournament Host, Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+47)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10841
  • Everything is Awesome!
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: RBD vs. JT
« Reply #4 on: September 15, 2010, 10:56:25 AM »
0
There was a ruling similar to this, though I forget what about, and I think it was ruled that the cards would be revealed and then returned to deck.

This is correct. JT doesn't stop your opponent from revealing cards, or the drawing from being insteaded. It merely stops the discard. Thus, The cards are revealed instead of drawn, and they return to where revealed cards return to as the default, which is the lcoation from which they were revealed.
Press 1 for more options.

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: RBD vs. JT
« Reply #5 on: September 15, 2010, 11:12:00 AM »
0
I'm disliking JT more and more...
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

Offline Professoralstad

  • Tournament Host, Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+47)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10841
  • Everything is Awesome!
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: RBD vs. JT
« Reply #6 on: September 15, 2010, 11:42:16 AM »
0
I'm disliking JT more and more...

High Places and Spreading Mildew will take care of it just fine in your Gold deck discard deck. Besides, with the popularity of Four-Drachma Coin and Simon the Zealot, I haven't JT that much, even after it got better.
Press 1 for more options.

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: RBD vs. JT
« Reply #7 on: September 15, 2010, 11:52:11 AM »
0
I don't use mildew because fortresses are very rare in my playgroups
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: RBD vs. JT
« Reply #8 on: September 15, 2010, 01:31:20 PM »
+2
o_0
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: RBD vs. JT
« Reply #9 on: September 15, 2010, 01:32:14 PM »
0
New playgroups, just starting out.  Fortresses are one of the last things to make their way into a noob's deck.
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

Offline SirNobody

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3113
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: RBD vs. JT
« Reply #10 on: September 15, 2010, 01:38:35 PM »
0
Hey,

Fortresses are one of the last things to make their way into a noob's deck.

Apparently I build decks like a noob.

Tschow,

Tim "Sir Nobody" Maly

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: RBD vs. JT
« Reply #11 on: September 15, 2010, 01:41:36 PM »
0
Not like that....
More like how a deck evolves as one buys more packs and expands one's collection.
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

Offline crustpope

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+27)
  • *****
  • Posts: 3844
  • Time for those Reds to SHINE!
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: RBD vs. JT
« Reply #12 on: September 17, 2010, 06:13:40 AM »
+1
With some of hte new sites..who needs fortresses?

Yes this is a snipe at the OP'edness of some of the new sites...
This space for rent

Offline RTSmaniac

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • *****
  • Posts: 4289
    • LFG
    • Southeast Region
    • ROOT Online
Re: RBD vs. JT
« Reply #13 on: September 17, 2010, 10:00:40 AM »
0
The new sites are quite overpowered. I remember when i first started out i would have to play 63-70 card decks just so all my fortresses would fit. Table of Demons + Tartaros FTW!
This is the way Lackey gave it to me. All hail the power of Lackey!

Offline The M

  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2216
  • FALCON PUNCH!
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: RBD vs. JT
« Reply #14 on: September 17, 2010, 05:17:15 PM »
0
Since everyone is playing Caesarea Phillipi wouldn't it just be better to play without sites?
Retired?

Offline crustpope

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+27)
  • *****
  • Posts: 3844
  • Time for those Reds to SHINE!
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: RBD vs. JT
« Reply #15 on: September 17, 2010, 09:36:08 PM »
0
Since everyone is playing Caesarea Phillipi wouldn't it just be better to play without sites?

You go ahead and do that....the rest of us will just continue to play with our sites over here...
This space for rent

Offline The M

  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2216
  • FALCON PUNCH!
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: RBD vs. JT
« Reply #16 on: November 06, 2010, 12:39:58 PM »
0
Site-lock is dead, Site-Annoyance is born...
Retired?

Offline Korunks

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2271
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: RBD vs. JT
« Reply #17 on: November 08, 2010, 09:49:49 AM »
0
Centurions make my day. :)
In AMERICA!!

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: RBD vs. JT
« Reply #18 on: November 08, 2010, 10:15:34 AM »
0
7/6 no SA?
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

Offline Master_Chi

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1367
  • I choose you, Pikachu.
Re: RBD vs. JT
« Reply #19 on: November 08, 2010, 11:13:54 AM »
0
7/6 no SA?

He may talking about the fellow from Capernaum.
I'm sorry I crammed 11 cookies in the VCR.

Offline Korunks

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+11)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2271
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: RBD vs. JT
« Reply #20 on: November 08, 2010, 11:16:28 AM »
0
and the dude from calvary ;D
In AMERICA!!

Offline TheJaylor

  • Trade Count: (+18)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3119
  • Fortress Alstad
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Redemption with Jayden
Re: RBD vs. JT
« Reply #21 on: November 08, 2010, 06:00:17 PM »
0
or the one your talking about

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal