Author Topic: Quick Question about green order of play (Read 2606 times)

NWJosh · « **on:** March 26, 2009, 01:01:41 PM »

First off I would ask that the newer players please refrain from answering as I want to make sure this is answered 100% correctly.

Okay here goes. I begin by setting aside Micah with Provisions. I wait my two turns then he comes back. With Hidden Treasures turned on I attack with Micah. Now here is my question what happens first in the order of operations a. The choosing of the blocker because of provisions or b. The playing of an enhancement.

Micah- (Prophet) SA not applicible

Provisions - Set hero aside for 2 turns. On return holder may draw 2 cards and may choose the Evil Character his opponent's uses to block Hero's next rescue attempt.

Hidden Treasures - Once per turn, if your lone green brigade prophet begins a battle you may play an Enhancement or discard an evil Enhancement in an opponent's deck.

TimMierz · « **Reply #1 on:** March 26, 2009, 01:05:51 PM »

Hidden Treasures cannot insert itself between the abilities on the Hero. The process of "beginning a battle" includes resolving all special abilities - even gained abilities, like Provisions - so Hidden Treasures doesn't allow the playing of an enhancement until a blocker is presented.

TheKarazyvicePresidentRR · « **Reply #2 on:** March 26, 2009, 01:27:46 PM »

which means you can choose your own brown ec then play clemancy of david to ignore him.

xCaLeBx · « **Reply #3 on:** March 26, 2009, 01:45:37 PM »

I would agree because its a gained ability making it a heroe SA which comes before a Artifact or a Weapon

Gabe · « **Reply #4 on:** March 26, 2009, 01:50:01 PM »

Tim and friends.

EmJayBee83 · « **Reply #5 on:** March 26, 2009, 02:22:31 PM »

Gabe and Tim and Friends.

NWJosh · « **Reply #6 on:** March 26, 2009, 03:13:42 PM »

thats what I had thought but I never want to build a deck on an assumption then mess myself up. Thanks everyone

crustpope · « **Reply #7 on:** March 26, 2009, 06:43:17 PM »

Quote from: TheKarazyvicePresidentRR on March 26, 2009, 01:27:46 PM

which means you can choose your own brown ec then play clemancy of david to ignore him.

This would be a typical use of this action, but what about this as a way around it from the blockers perspective.

Lurking + any fbtn that is not brown. I know that micah would ignore lurking since it was played on brown but if he bands it to KoT or Saphira, would that not negate the ignore card and make it a FBTN with brown on one side and green on the other?

I only ask because I am trying to come up with defenses for all of these sic combos, especially since st. patty is a prophet /priest now.

STAMP · « **Reply #8 on:** March 26, 2009, 06:55:42 PM »

Josh, do you mean you forgot all those Two Bears I played on you at district?!

TheKarazyvicePresidentRR · « **Reply #9 on:** March 26, 2009, 10:29:29 PM »

Quote from: crustpope on March 26, 2009, 06:43:17 PM

Quote from: TheKarazyvicePresidentRR on March 26, 2009, 01:27:46 PM
which means you can choose your own brown ec then play clemancy of david to ignore him.

This would be a typical use of this action, but what about this as a way around it from the blockers perspective.

Lurking + any fbtn that is not brown. I know that micah would ignore lurking since it was played on brown but if he bands it to KoT or Saphira, would that not negate the ignore card and make it a FBTN with brown on one side and green on the other?

I only ask because I am trying to come up with defenses for all of these sic combos, especially since st. patty is a prophet /priest now.

You COULD but I wouldn't give you a high numbered ec to begin with, so i'd still win, I'd just lose micah, and I really don't care if I lose one hero in decks that have heroes

. But yes you would make my kill my ec that way.

NWJosh · « **Reply #10 on:** March 27, 2009, 01:01:24 AM »

No Scott didn't forget, just found something additional to do but I needed to confirm little things before the combo works.

Cactus Game Design Message Boards

News:

Author Topic: Quick Question about green order of play (Read 2606 times)

NWJosh

Quick Question about green order of play

TimMierz

Re: Quick Question about green order of play

TheKarazyvicePresidentRR

Re: Quick Question about green order of play

xCaLeBx

Re: Quick Question about green order of play

Gabe

Re: Quick Question about green order of play

EmJayBee83

Re: Quick Question about green order of play

NWJosh

Re: Quick Question about green order of play

crustpope

Re: Quick Question about green order of play

STAMP

Re: Quick Question about green order of play

TheKarazyvicePresidentRR

Re: Quick Question about green order of play

NWJosh

Re: Quick Question about green order of play