Author Topic: Definition of "alone"  (Read 1781 times)

Offline sepjazzwarrior

  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2283
  • The best defense is a fast offense
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Definition of "alone"
« on: July 28, 2017, 08:26:57 AM »
0
If there an official definition for the word "alone"? I ask because for cards like peace that only work if the character is alone, is a character really alone if there is a EC in battle (remember in redemption, intent of the card doesn't matter).  I'm not saying that this is how it should work, only that I can't find a definition of what alone means and it should be codified that it means on your side of the battle

Peace: Place on your clay or blue Hero: When this Hero is in battle alone, toss all Enhancements played this battle. Cannot be interrupted.

Offline Watchman

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+47)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2487
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: Definition of "alone"
« Reply #1 on: July 28, 2017, 09:57:27 AM »
0
Intent does matter and this is an example of it. But it also is clear, in my opinion, that it's referring to the hero not banded to another hero. Peace doesn't say "if there's only one character in battle." If it did then your argument has a valid point. Additionally, there is no functional use of Peace's ability to toss all enhs in battle if the hero is the only character in battle as the hero would not have initiative to play an enh (unless a card like Hidden Treasures allows him to).
Overcome satan by the blood of the Lamb, your testimony, and don't love your life to the death!

Offline sepjazzwarrior

  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2283
  • The best defense is a fast offense
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: Definition of "alone"
« Reply #2 on: July 28, 2017, 10:07:42 AM »
0
Intent doesn't matter, look at cards like priestly breastplate, a new beginning, and how split alter was ruled for a long time as proof.  what matters it what the card says and the definition on the words on the card.  I also believe that it should be ruled as it was intended, which is why I'm asking if there is an official definition for alone

Offline Kevinthedude

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • *****
  • Posts: 1856
  • Yo
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Definition of "alone"
« Reply #3 on: July 28, 2017, 10:12:56 AM »
0
There is no specific game definition for the word alone, but there are lots of other cards, new and old, that refer to characters being alone and always means on their side of the battle.

If you want some kind of game text to back this up, the closet there is are old immune to lone Heroes ECs that have the clarifying text "Only a rescue attempt of 2 or more Heroes can be successful". Since the ability references lone Heroes and the clarifying text says that 2 or more Heroes are required in battle for the Hero not to be alone, it follows that alone means 1 Hero in battle.

That said everything should be defined beyond doubt, hopefully this gets a note in the REG.
« Last Edit: July 28, 2017, 10:16:38 AM by Kevinthedude »

Offline Watchman

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+47)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2487
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: Definition of "alone"
« Reply #4 on: July 28, 2017, 10:16:18 AM »
0
Again, I disagree. Intent does matter; that's why many cards receive errata so as to make it either functionally clearer and/or to be in line with what the designer's intent was when the card was created but somehow it did not get conveyed correctly in the printed version.
Overcome satan by the blood of the Lamb, your testimony, and don't love your life to the death!

Offline The Guardian

  • Playtester, Redemption Elder
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+96)
  • *****
  • Posts: 12344
  • The Stars are coming out...
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Definition of "alone"
« Reply #5 on: July 28, 2017, 10:22:01 AM »
+3
If you're in a fight against 3 other people and no one is helping you, you're fighting alone, right? That's just common vernacular.

Intent matters when a card doesn't work at all with the way it's worded.

For example, A Child is Born says "Cannot not be negated" which makes no sense and doesn't work so it received errata. Split Altar did still function as written, therefore it did not receive errata.
Fortress Alstad
Have you checked the REG?
Have you looked it up in ORCID?

Offline sepjazzwarrior

  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2283
  • The best defense is a fast offense
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: Definition of "alone"
« Reply #6 on: July 28, 2017, 10:25:43 AM »
0
The fact that the cards need an errata to make them work shows that intent doesn't matter when making ruling, which is why the wording on the cards needs to changed to make them work as intended

I think we are talking about two sides of the same coin here. when I hear you say "intent matters" that to me means you are saying split alter should have been able to shuffle the art pile before the rule change, because that is how it was intended to work, which is not how redemption works.  when a card does not work as intended, we errata it, we don't play it like it was intended even when how the card is worded makes it play differently

Offline The Guardian

  • Playtester, Redemption Elder
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+96)
  • *****
  • Posts: 12344
  • The Stars are coming out...
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Definition of "alone"
« Reply #7 on: July 28, 2017, 10:26:59 AM »
0
The intent is for cards to work, even if it's not necessarily how we intended them to work originally.
Fortress Alstad
Have you checked the REG?
Have you looked it up in ORCID?

Offline Watchman

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+47)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2487
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: Definition of "alone"
« Reply #8 on: July 28, 2017, 10:31:50 AM »
0
I agree with sepjazz that the definition should be codified. I understand and agree with the desire to shorten SAs on cards by using "keywords" that have defaults, but those words need to be defined in order to be effective.

We have to keep in mind that, theoretically, new players are joining the game and are not aware of past rulings or the clarifying text that we used to use. They will read the card and do what makes sense at the time. I can certainly see how a new player would read this card and say, "Oh well, my character is not alone in battle because there is an EC in battle too."

I've taught several new players this game and I can tell you this issue has never come up with this wording on any related cards, such as Foreign Spearman or the like. When band is taught the new player understands that another character is brought into battle, causing the hero not to be alone any longer. So by the time the new player is exposed to cards like Peace or Foreign Spearman they have at least used a starter deck that has already taught them about band abilities, so they will understand that "alone" is clearly referring to a sole hero or EC in battle. Also, will a new player really be searching the REG to determine what "Alone" means anyways? Most new players never even know where or what the REG is or use the REG in the first place. As Kevin said it's clear that it's referring to the hero's side of battle, not if there is an EC in battle as well. And as I previously mentioned in my first post there is no functionality to this "alone" ability if you never have initiative  to play an enh in the first place.
Overcome satan by the blood of the Lamb, your testimony, and don't love your life to the death!

Offline sepjazzwarrior

  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2283
  • The best defense is a fast offense
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: Definition of "alone"
« Reply #9 on: July 28, 2017, 10:33:59 AM »
-6
so then either alone needs an official definition or peace needs an errata, because right now alone in redemption alone means nothing and the English definition doesn't give a clear idea of what to do, since whenever 2 characters are together, they are not alone

Offline Watchman

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+47)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2487
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: Definition of "alone"
« Reply #10 on: July 28, 2017, 10:45:13 AM »
0
I've taught several new players this game and I can tell you this issue has never come up with this wording on any related cards, such as Foreign Spearman or the like.

Never come up for you.... I certainly hope you can agree that people from other playgroups and states have different experiences than you have.  ;)

Then I would encourage any other player or tournament host on this forum to cite an example of this particular topic arising during any of their play experiences. More specifically, I would ask YMT or Jazz to cite an example of this coming up during any of your play experiences. I seriously doubt anyone else has experienced this either.
Overcome satan by the blood of the Lamb, your testimony, and don't love your life to the death!

Offline sepjazzwarrior

  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2283
  • The best defense is a fast offense
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: Definition of "alone"
« Reply #11 on: July 28, 2017, 10:48:59 AM »
0
This came up for me when I was deckbuilding today.  Even so, does it matter if it has come up?  The abilities in redemption should be clearly defined, this one is not.  It hurts no one to define what alone means and only makes the game easier to understand.

Offline The Guardian

  • Playtester, Redemption Elder
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+96)
  • *****
  • Posts: 12344
  • The Stars are coming out...
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Definition of "alone"
« Reply #12 on: July 28, 2017, 10:52:38 AM »
+3
I guess it just confuses me that people always say the REG is too big and "who has time to read the REG?" but then they want every single word ever used on a Redemption card to have a definition... ::)

There are a lot of things that need to be codified--rules that have been in place for years and may have been stated in an older version of the REG and got lost during overhauls, or were meant to be added and never were for some reason or another. Don't get me wrong, proofing the REG is a continuous process that we do want help on. Personally I don't feel a definition for "lone" or "alone" is needed, but as a team, we'll take the feedback into consideration.
Fortress Alstad
Have you checked the REG?
Have you looked it up in ORCID?

Offline Watchman

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+47)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2487
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: Definition of "alone"
« Reply #13 on: July 28, 2017, 11:08:16 AM »
0
Then I would encourage any other player or tournament host on this forum to cite an example of this particular topic arising during any of their play experiences. More specifically, I would ask YMT or Jazz to cite an example of this coming up during any of your play experiences. I seriously doubt anyone else has experienced this either.

Wow. OK, then. Forgive me for submitting my opinion on an open forum.

Personally I don't feel a definition for "lone" or "alone" is needed, but as a team, we'll take the feedback into consideration.

Thank you for at least considering the possibility, Justin.  ;D

Of course there's no problem with any of us submitting our opinion on an open forum. But don't expect not to get a counter argument or point to your opinion. There was no offense intended on my end, just a challenge to submit an example of this coming up in the past based upon your response to my response. Because if it has come up in the past on several occasions then apparently it would warrant a REG entry for clarity. My point was that I doubted this has come up though with any other players (other than today).
Overcome satan by the blood of the Lamb, your testimony, and don't love your life to the death!

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: Definition of "alone"
« Reply #14 on: August 07, 2017, 12:12:25 AM »
+2
A "lone gunman" means he was the only gunman, not that nobody else was around. A "lone Hero" means there aren't any other heroes in battle. It's not very complicated. Peace is worded slightly differently but it is clearly the same mechanic as described "lone."

That said, it should have a glossary entry.
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

Offline Zerutul

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 34
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: Definition of "alone"
« Reply #15 on: August 07, 2017, 12:35:39 AM »
+1
+1 To putting it in the REG. If the purpose of the REG is to layout every single aspect of redemption defining everything is necessary.

Offline sepjazzwarrior

  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2283
  • The best defense is a fast offense
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: Definition of "alone"
« Reply #16 on: August 07, 2017, 08:49:50 AM »
0
If two people are fighting in a room, would you say either of those people are alone in the room?  It all depends on your frame of reference. 

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: Definition of "alone"
« Reply #17 on: August 08, 2017, 09:11:48 AM »
0
Not when it's tied to "lone" as I showed in my previous post.
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

Offline sepjazzwarrior

  • Trade Count: (+30)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2283
  • The best defense is a fast offense
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: Definition of "alone"
« Reply #18 on: August 08, 2017, 09:19:52 AM »
+1
The fact you are saying it should have a glossary entry means that you see how it can be interpreted different ways.  There have been other people here that see it the same way as I do, as less than 100% clear.  I'm not saying that it should be ruled any differently than it is now, only that it should be defined because any time 2 people are together, they are not alone.  The primary definition of alone says "in no one else's presence" which would not be true of having 2 opposing characters in battle.

Offline Minister Polarius

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 15920
  • Grand Minister of Music and Video Games
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • Macclelland Music
Re: Definition of "alone"
« Reply #19 on: August 08, 2017, 09:22:00 AM »
+4
Everything "can" be interpreted different ways. That doesn't mean each interpretation is equally logical and valid. It should have a glossary entry because every Redemption term should, not because it's currently confusing.
I am not talking about T2 unless I am explicitly talking about T2. Also Mayhem is fine now somehow!

Offline Kevinthedude

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • *****
  • Posts: 1856
  • Yo
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Definition of "alone"
« Reply #20 on: August 08, 2017, 10:33:36 AM »
+2
It should have a glossary entry because every Redemption term should, not because it's currently confusing.

 +1

I cannot express how much I agree with this. The rulebook is for learning how to play and finding answers to simple questions, the purpose of something like the REG is to be as exhaustive as possible. More definitions make the game better.

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal