Check out our Event Calendar! View birthdays, holidays and upcoming tournaments!
Total Members Voted: 74
Voting closed: September 22, 2011, 09:46:33 PM
Maybe Doubt and Glory of the Lord could count as -1 dominants, therefore allowing you to actually add another dominant to cancel them out.
postcount.add(1);
The deck-building rule would apply to all dominants, regardless of their usefulness. We can't make exceptions for weak ones without frustrating tournament hosts (myself included).
Doubt bans itself. GotL hasn't been good since Priests.
Quote from: Minister Polarius on September 16, 2011, 12:39:55 AMDoubt bans itself. GotL hasn't been good since Priests.Doubt won me two games at Nationals.One thing that would make this interesting is it would increase the strategy required for TEAMS deck-building.
One thing that would make this interesting is it would increase the strategy required for TEAMS deck-building.
I've seen TEAMS decks piloted by top players that had all the dominants in one deck, and used the space in the other for some nasty tricks. This'll eliminate that type of deck.
Quote from: Chronic Apathy on September 16, 2011, 09:05:14 AMOne thing that would make this interesting is it would increase the strategy required for TEAMS deck-building.The best teams already don't duplicate their Dominants, so I'm not sure how this would change anything for Teams.
Quote from: Prof Underwood on September 16, 2011, 12:25:48 AMMaybe Doubt and Glory of the Lord could count as -1 dominants, therefore allowing you to actually add another dominant to cancel them out.Heh. That is precisely young JSB23's position.
I 'll vote for Count Fount for Redemption Dictator as long as I get to be in his Cabinet as Minister of Painful Punishments.