Author Topic: Proposed Deck building T1 rule change: multiple Generics  (Read 14763 times)

Offline Jmbeers

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 849
    • -
    • Northeast Region
0
How would type 1 be affected by allowing a player to have 2 of an Identical but Generic character per every 50 cards.

I personally think this could open the game up to better defenses but would it be too much of a boost to defense? 
The only reason people get lost in thought is because it's unfamiliar territory.

Chris

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Proposed Deck building T1 rule change: multiple Generics
« Reply #1 on: May 07, 2012, 12:18:40 AM »
0
It would be so fun to see Assyrians rock T1. I'm probably against the idea, but I'm curious what other people have to say.

Offline Jmbeers

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 849
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Proposed Deck building T1 rule change: multiple Generics
« Reply #2 on: May 07, 2012, 12:26:03 AM »
0
Yes it would probably make Assyrians a Tier 1 defense but would make demos and magicians better and give Pharisees and Sadducees a boost.
The only reason people get lost in thought is because it's unfamiliar territory.

Offline jbeers285

  • Trade Count: (+34)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3369
  • bravo
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Proposed Deck building T1 rule change: multiple Generics
« Reply #3 on: May 07, 2012, 02:25:14 AM »
0
I think it could be fun

Jerome we should play some games that allow that when I get home and we could offer a little better opinion on the topic


Faith ain't easy to understand 1 bird in the bush beats 2 in your hand
JMM is a modern day prophet

Lamborghini_diablo

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Proposed Deck building T1 rule change: multiple Generics
« Reply #4 on: May 07, 2012, 02:33:36 AM »
0
Legion already does this type of thing, and I don't feel like it is overpowered.

I support this, as I've always been a fan of generics.

Offline Wings of Music

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1002
  • ~Matthew 5:8~
    • -
    • Southwest Region
Re: Proposed Deck building T1 rule change: multiple Generics
« Reply #5 on: May 07, 2012, 10:51:19 AM »
0
It depends on what the limit is.  If it's a limit of 2 I'm for it, if it's a limit of anything more than that I'm against it.
...ellipses...

Offline Jmbeers

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 849
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Proposed Deck building T1 rule change: multiple Generics
« Reply #6 on: May 07, 2012, 11:16:33 AM »
+2
I was actually thinking 2 for the first 50 and then you may add one for the next 50 like how it is right now. It would look like this.

50 cards: 2 generics
100 cards: 3 generics
150 cards: 4 generics
The only reason people get lost in thought is because it's unfamiliar territory.

Offline Wings of Music

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1002
  • ~Matthew 5:8~
    • -
    • Southwest Region
Re: Proposed Deck building T1 rule change: multiple Generics
« Reply #7 on: May 07, 2012, 11:32:10 AM »
0
That I could go for. 
...ellipses...

Offline megamanlan

  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2914
  • Autobots! Transform and play Redemption!
    • LFG
    • North Central Region
Re: Proposed Deck building T1 rule change: multiple Generics
« Reply #8 on: May 07, 2012, 12:43:37 PM »
0
I'd support this idea.
They seem pretty lame as fighters maybe we should challenge them to a dance off or a redemption game

Offline Praeceps

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • *****
  • Posts: 888
    • LFG
    • East Central Region
Re: Proposed Deck building T1 rule change: multiple Generics
« Reply #9 on: May 07, 2012, 01:00:39 PM »
0
As long as we keep it restricted to generics, I think it would be great. Defense could use a boost that's not a chump block and this could do it.
Just one more thing...

Offline Red Wing

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2379
  • Set rotation shill
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Proposed Deck building T1 rule change: multiple Generics
« Reply #10 on: May 07, 2012, 01:11:21 PM »
0
As long as we keep it restricted to generics, I think it would be great. Defense could use a boost that's not a chump block and this could do it.
Trembling Demon is Generic.
Kansas City Discord: discord.gg/2ypYg6m

Offline Praeceps

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • *****
  • Posts: 888
    • LFG
    • East Central Region
Re: Proposed Deck building T1 rule change: multiple Generics
« Reply #11 on: May 07, 2012, 01:25:24 PM »
0
As long as we keep it restricted to generics, I think it would be great. Defense could use a boost that's not a chump block and this could do it.
Trembling Demon is Generic.

Yes and there are many ways to deal with him: discarding an enhancement or any FBTN Hero for two.
Just one more thing...

Offline Red Wing

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2379
  • Set rotation shill
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Proposed Deck building T1 rule change: multiple Generics
« Reply #12 on: May 07, 2012, 01:29:10 PM »
0
As long as we keep it restricted to generics, I think it would be great. Defense could use a boost that's not a chump block and this could do it.
Trembling Demon is Generic.

Yes and there are many ways to deal with him: discarding an enhancement or any FBTN Hero for two.
Holy of Holies deals with both of those ways.
Kansas City Discord: discord.gg/2ypYg6m

Offline Praeceps

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • *****
  • Posts: 888
    • LFG
    • East Central Region
Re: Proposed Deck building T1 rule change: multiple Generics
« Reply #13 on: May 07, 2012, 01:40:04 PM »
0
As long as we keep it restricted to generics, I think it would be great. Defense could use a boost that's not a chump block and this could do it.
Trembling Demon is Generic.
Yes and there are many ways to deal with him: discarding an enhancement or any FBTN Hero for two.
Holy of Holies deals with both of those ways.
Then we would be putting another rarely used card back into circulation like Disciples did with CoT. Having two of them isn't that big of a deal. And I thought we wanted to slow down offenses?
Just one more thing...

Chris

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Proposed Deck building T1 rule change: multiple Generics
« Reply #14 on: May 07, 2012, 01:40:58 PM »
+2
As long as we keep it restricted to generics, I think it would be great. Defense could use a boost that's not a chump block and this could do it.
Trembling Demon is Generic.
Yes and there are many ways to deal with him: discarding an enhancement or any FBTN Hero for two.
Holy of Holies deals with both of those ways.
Then we would be putting another rarely used card back into circulation like Disciples did with CoT. Having two of them isn't that big of a deal. And I thought we wanted to slow down offenses?

Trembling Demon isn't that unused, but I don't think it matters. I like this idea, and I'm going to propose it for ROOT.

Offline Red Wing

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2379
  • Set rotation shill
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Proposed Deck building T1 rule change: multiple Generics
« Reply #15 on: May 07, 2012, 01:42:42 PM »
+1
As long as we keep it restricted to generics, I think it would be great. Defense could use a boost that's not a chump block and this could do it.
Trembling Demon is Generic.
Yes and there are many ways to deal with him: discarding an enhancement or any FBTN Hero for two.
Holy of Holies deals with both of those ways.
Then we would be putting another rarely used card back into circulation like Disciples did with CoT. Having two of them isn't that big of a deal. And I thought we wanted to slow down offenses?
HoH+Trembling Demon isn't an obscure combo. And it's definitely a "chump" block.

But it's probably not that big of a deal.
Kansas City Discord: discord.gg/2ypYg6m

Offline Praeceps

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • *****
  • Posts: 888
    • LFG
    • East Central Region
Re: Proposed Deck building T1 rule change: multiple Generics
« Reply #16 on: May 07, 2012, 01:44:45 PM »
0
Trembling Demon isn't that unused, but I don't think it matters. I like this idea, and I'm going to propose it for ROOT.
I meant Holy of Holies was unused, sorry for the confusion. I probably should have said underused, as well. And I'm all for trying this in ROOT.

And TD can be ignored in a fair few ways: TGT, Zeb, WS, 3 Nails...
Just one more thing...

Chris

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Proposed Deck building T1 rule change: multiple Generics
« Reply #17 on: May 07, 2012, 01:46:52 PM »
0
Trembling Demon isn't that unused, but I don't think it matters. I like this idea, and I'm going to propose it for ROOT.
I meant Holy of Holies was unused, sorry for the confusion. I probably should have said underused, as well. And I'm all for trying this in ROOT.

And TD can be ignored in a fair few ways: TGT, Zeb, WS, 3 Nails...

Holy of Holies isn't that unused either since the two generally go hand in hand. Especially in this meta.

Offline Wings of Music

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1002
  • ~Matthew 5:8~
    • -
    • Southwest Region
Re: Proposed Deck building T1 rule change: multiple Generics
« Reply #18 on: May 07, 2012, 02:11:30 PM »
0
So true.  I really think that this should be tried in ROOT, I'm liking this more and more. 
...ellipses...

Offline Master Q

  • Trade Count: (+65)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1111
  • Onward...
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: Proposed Deck building T1 rule change: multiple Generics
« Reply #19 on: May 07, 2012, 02:26:31 PM »
0
Because Speed decks need more Sabbath Breakers. :P

On the flipside, Panic Demons would get a boost ::)
If you were to go on a trip... where would you like to go?

Offline Wings of Music

  • Trade Count: (+9)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1002
  • ~Matthew 5:8~
    • -
    • Southwest Region
Re: Proposed Deck building T1 rule change: multiple Generics
« Reply #20 on: May 07, 2012, 02:31:52 PM »
0
I don't really expect people would add extra Sabbath Breakers.   

I would expect more trembling demons, more Proud Pharisees and more Generic Assyrians. 
...ellipses...

Offline Professoralstad

  • Tournament Host, Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+47)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10841
  • Everything is Awesome!
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Proposed Deck building T1 rule change: multiple Generics
« Reply #21 on: May 07, 2012, 02:33:27 PM »
0
I don't really expect people would add extra Sabbath Breakers.   

I would expect more trembling demons, more Proud Pharisees and more Generic Assyrians.

Why wouldn't they?
Press 1 for more options.

Offline Arrthoa

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 876
    • LFG
    • Southeast Region
Re: Proposed Deck building T1 rule change: multiple Generics
« Reply #22 on: May 07, 2012, 02:34:03 PM »
0
What is CoT? I coudn't find it in the Abbreviations and Acronyms

Offline Professoralstad

  • Tournament Host, Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+47)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10841
  • Everything is Awesome!
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Proposed Deck building T1 rule change: multiple Generics
« Reply #23 on: May 07, 2012, 02:35:11 PM »
0
What is CoT? I coudn't find it in the Abbreviations and Acronyms

Crown of Thorns.
Press 1 for more options.

Offline Arrthoa

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 876
    • LFG
    • Southeast Region
Re: Proposed Deck building T1 rule change: multiple Generics
« Reply #24 on: May 07, 2012, 02:39:18 PM »
0
Should've known that that since it's in my deck. :laugh:

Also I think the rule won't change that much cause all it'll really do is add more defense which is better

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal