Author Topic: Protect vs. Place  (Read 937 times)

Offline DDiceRC

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • *****
  • Posts: 678
  • Redemption New Jersey
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Protect vs. Place
« on: May 08, 2010, 10:55:48 AM »
0
If a character is protected from harm or effect, can a card be placed on it? I would assume any harm or effect from that card would be ignored, but if the protect conditions become no longer in effect then it would hit the character. Some place cards (like Destructive Sin) affect cards other than the character, so there would be reason to do this.

I would think you could do the placement, since the placement by itself is not a "harm or effect," but perhaps it has been ruled otherwise.
Redemption Curmudgeon
"If we are out of our mind, it is for the sake of God..." (2 Cor. 5:13a)

Offline Ehud Cubed

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • New Member
  • *
  • Posts: 60
  • Left-Handed fat-stabbing to the third power!
    • Realistic Christianity
Re: Protect vs. Place
« Reply #1 on: May 08, 2010, 11:57:08 AM »
0
I think it doesn't depend on the place effect, good place effects (like Drawn Out) would not be harm, but it would be an effect nonetheless. In this way, it would act almost like another layer of a FBTN effect, but this time it also works out of battle. No matter how many good enhancements you play on Moses, he's still just getting the numbers (unless there is a CBN ability on one, or HOH is active)
Me: So a key card in my T2 deck is a common?
SirNobody: Worse, an Angel Wars common.

Offline Bryon

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4821
  • Dare to Tread into the Dawn
    • -
    • Southwest Region
    • Redemption California
Re: Protect vs. Place
« Reply #2 on: May 08, 2010, 01:08:33 PM »
0
If a character is protected from harm or effect, can a card be placed on it?
no

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal