Author Topic: Practice for Newer Tournament Judges...  (Read 5664 times)

Offline EmJayBee83

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • *****
  • Posts: 5486
  • Ha! It's funny because the squirrel gets dead.
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • mjb Games
Practice for Newer Tournament Judges...
« on: February 04, 2009, 09:51:14 AM »
0
This arose last night in a game, and I promised I would ask--so here goes...

I activated I Am Holy, and proceeded to discard a good card from my hand to make my opponent discard an evil card. My opponent asked if he could play Destruction of Nehushtan. I ruled that he had to discard an evil card or show hand. Following that, since I Am Holy is not CBN, he could play DoN and get his evil card back. Unfortunately for him, the only evil card he had in hand was DoN.

Two quick questions:
1) Was this ruled correctly?
2) What if I Am Holy's SA started with Once per turn instead of Upon activation?

I Am Holy  SA  Upon activation, holder may discard a good card from hand to make an opponent discard an evil card from hand. If opponent has no evil cards in hand, opponent must reveal hand.

Destruction of Nehushtan  SA  Discard one active Artifact in play. Artifact's ability is negated.

TheMarti

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Practice for Newer Tournament Judges...
« Reply #1 on: February 04, 2009, 09:53:46 AM »
+1
1. I believe it was ruled correctly. The ability of "upon activation" needs to complete before the playing of a dominant. Kinda in the same realm of how Urim and Thummim is... it has to complete before the opponent can react.

2. I believe that it would still be ruled the same way. I could be wrong.

~Marti

Offline Gabe

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+69)
  • *****
  • Posts: 10675
  • From Moses to the prophets, it's all about Him!
    • -
    • North Central Region
    • Land of Redemption
Re: Practice for Newer Tournament Judges...
« Reply #2 on: February 04, 2009, 09:59:06 AM »
0
+1 w/Marti.

Even if it was once per turn the player activating it would get the opportunitty to complete the ability when they turned the Covenant face up on the Artifact pile.
Have you visited the Land of Redemption today?

Offline Cameron the Conqueror

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6586
  • Post # doesn't reflect personal theology. Retired.
    • -
    • Southwest Region
Re: Practice for Newer Tournament Judges...
« Reply #3 on: February 04, 2009, 10:05:28 AM »
0
+1 with Marti and Gabe.

Warrior_Monk

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Practice for Newer Tournament Judges...
« Reply #4 on: February 04, 2009, 10:21:01 AM »
+1
this happened to me once. and the buckler was the card that was discarded... only TheRoc would do such a thing...

Offline metalpsalm

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1379
  • The LORD sat as King at the flood Psalm 29:10
    • -
    • East Central Region
    • League of Extraordinary Redemption CCG Players
Re: Practice for Newer Tournament Judges...
« Reply #5 on: February 04, 2009, 10:40:19 AM »
0
Yep, the hand was targeted and the SA had to be completed before he could throw a Dominant. Devastating. I love it!
Official creator of the first version of Heroless, albeit the joke version  =] I wear it proudly!

Offline megamanlan

  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2914
  • Autobots! Transform and play Redemption!
    • LFG
    • North Central Region
Re: Practice for Newer Tournament Judges...
« Reply #6 on: February 14, 2012, 10:12:55 PM »
0
Can someone clarify why a Negate is overruled by a non-CBI card? I thought the game rule states that Negate stops an effect unless noted to be CBI/CBN.
They seem pretty lame as fighters maybe we should challenge them to a dance off or a redemption game

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Practice for Newer Tournament Judges...
« Reply #7 on: February 14, 2012, 10:15:06 PM »
0
The ability needed to complete before it was able to be negated.  See the aforementioned U&T
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

Offline megamanlan

  • Trade Count: (+26)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2914
  • Autobots! Transform and play Redemption!
    • LFG
    • North Central Region
Re: Practice for Newer Tournament Judges...
« Reply #8 on: February 14, 2012, 10:23:32 PM »
0
I don't get that. It's like saying that an EE must finish before u can play Live Coal.
They seem pretty lame as fighters maybe we should challenge them to a dance off or a redemption game

Chronic Apathy

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Practice for Newer Tournament Judges...
« Reply #9 on: February 14, 2012, 10:50:00 PM »
0
That relates to special initiative, which is different. In this case, special initiative doesn't play into it.

Warrior_Monk

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Practice for Newer Tournament Judges...
« Reply #10 on: February 14, 2012, 11:10:32 PM »
0
Can someone clarify why a Negate is overruled by a non-CBI card? I thought the game rule states that Negate stops an effect unless noted to be CBI/CBN.
Because I am Holy's ability has to complete. If DoN is the only evil card in their hand, it must be discarded, and then there's nothing to negate it with. If you had a different evil card to discard, you could then use DoN and get the evil card back.

EDIT: Instaposted...
DOUBLE EDIT: Wait, time stamp is all wrong. Maybe I just didn't read far enough? I guess I further explained things, so I'll leave it.
« Last Edit: February 14, 2012, 11:22:51 PM by Ring Wraith »

Offline Alex_Olijar

  • 16plus
  • Trade Count: (+15)
  • *
  • Posts: 8124
  • This guy is my mascot
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Practice for Newer Tournament Judges...
« Reply #11 on: February 14, 2012, 11:35:23 PM »
0
He is actually posting on this thread in reference to a UandT situation.

Offline Redoubter

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4910
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Practice for Newer Tournament Judges...
« Reply #12 on: February 15, 2012, 08:57:16 PM »
0
I have another question, because multiple people in this thread have mentioned negating the artifact with DoN and getting their evil card back.

I was under the impression that DoN does NOT interrupt, as it FIRST discards, THEN negates.  With this wording DoN only negates ongoing abilities, and any instant abilities already completed stay completed.  Can someone please confirm or deny this for me?

Offline Red Wing

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2379
  • Set rotation shill
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Practice for Newer Tournament Judges...
« Reply #13 on: February 15, 2012, 08:59:11 PM »
0
I was under the impression that DoN does NOT interrupt, as it FIRST discards, THEN negates.
Correct. DoN discards the art before it negates it. This is why Lampstand of the Sanctuary is protected from DoN.
Kansas City Discord: discord.gg/2ypYg6m

Offline Redoubter

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4910
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Practice for Newer Tournament Judges...
« Reply #14 on: February 15, 2012, 09:02:20 PM »
0
I was under the impression that DoN does NOT interrupt, as it FIRST discards, THEN negates.
Correct. DoN discards the art before it negates it. This is why Lampstand of the Sanctuary is protected from DoN.

Right, which in this case would mean an evil card discarded would NOT be returned, correct?  That is what I want to make sure I have clarified.

Offline Red Wing

  • Trade Count: (+5)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2379
  • Set rotation shill
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Practice for Newer Tournament Judges...
« Reply #15 on: February 15, 2012, 09:05:21 PM »
0
I was under the impression that DoN does NOT interrupt, as it FIRST discards, THEN negates.
Correct. DoN discards the art before it negates it. This is why Lampstand of the Sanctuary is protected from DoN.

Right, which in this case would mean an evil card discarded would NOT be returned, correct?  That is what I want to make sure I have clarified.
That sounds right to me, but INE.
Kansas City Discord: discord.gg/2ypYg6m

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Practice for Newer Tournament Judges...
« Reply #16 on: February 15, 2012, 09:48:49 PM »
0
You can still negate it, though I can't tell you why...
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

Offline Redoubter

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4910
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Practice for Newer Tournament Judges...
« Reply #17 on: February 15, 2012, 09:56:20 PM »
0
You can still negate it, though I can't tell you why...

As in "I don't understand it myself" or "Shh...it's a secret"?

Because I don't see how it can negate an instant as opposed to an ongoing ability during the prep phase.  I just want to make sure I've seen this ruled correctly so far.

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Practice for Newer Tournament Judges...
« Reply #18 on: February 15, 2012, 10:01:08 PM »
0
As in "I can't quote where the REG says that" because I don't know what section it would be in.
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

Offline Professoralstad

  • Tournament Host, Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+47)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10841
  • Everything is Awesome!
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Practice for Newer Tournament Judges...
« Reply #19 on: February 15, 2012, 11:20:16 PM »
+1
You can still negate it, though I can't tell you why...

You can negate discarded cards, so long as the negating card can specifically target a discarded card. So DoN discards an Art, and negates the discarded Art, just like Captured Ark shuffles an Art, and negates the shuffled Art.
Press 1 for more options.

Offline Red Warrior

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+27)
  • *****
  • Posts: 498
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Practice for Newer Tournament Judges...
« Reply #20 on: February 15, 2012, 11:29:03 PM »
0
As much as we complain about "play as", this is actually a very helpful entry:

Destruction of Nehushtan (Pa)
Type: Grim Reaper • Brigade: None • Ability: None • Class: None • Special Ability: Discard one active Artifact in play. Artifact's ability is negated. • Play As: Discard one Artifact to negate its special ability. • Identifiers: False Religious Practice • Verse: II Kings 18:4 • Availability: Patriarchs booster packs (Ultra Rare).

It uses "cost - benefit" verbiage to explain "no discard = no negate". 
-Joey

Red was always playable :)

Offline Redoubter

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4910
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Practice for Newer Tournament Judges...
« Reply #21 on: February 15, 2012, 11:37:24 PM »
0
You can still negate it, though I can't tell you why...

You can negate discarded cards, so long as the negating card can specifically target a discarded card. So DoN discards an Art, and negates the discarded Art, just like Captured Ark shuffles an Art, and negates the shuffled Art.

I'm sorry, I don't think I made my question clear.  I don't mean that it cannot negate it because the artifact is discarded by the time the negate occurs.  I am asking if it is able to actually negate the instant (and resolved) ability of an artifact in the prep phase.

In this case, an evil card was discarded by said artifact.  DoN comes along, discards it, then the negate happens.  There is no ongoing ability, and I was not aware that instant, resolved abilities could be negated in the prep phase (or at any point outside of battle with an ITB, interrupt last, negate X, etc.).  So, in this case, I was not aware that you could undo the discarding of your evil card, for instance, since the ability has resolved.

Hopefully my question is clearer now, sorry.

Offline YourMathTeacher

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+80)
  • *****
  • Posts: 11089
    • -
    • Southeast Region
Re: Practice for Newer Tournament Judges...
« Reply #22 on: February 15, 2012, 11:49:25 PM »
0
I am asking if it is able to actually negate the instant (and resolved) ability of an artifact in the prep phase.

Yes you can negate in the Prep Phase. Dominants can be played at any time, so this dominant in played in the same phase that the artifact was activated, so it can be negated. The rule you might be thinking of is the fact that negates can not happen in a later phase. So if the artifact used an instant ability in the Prep Phase, your opponent could not negate it in the Battle Phase.
My wife is a hottie.

Offline Redoubter

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4910
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Practice for Newer Tournament Judges...
« Reply #23 on: February 16, 2012, 12:04:22 AM »
0
Alright, thanks for clearing that up everyone.  Up until now I just thought that instant vs ongoing mattered even in the same phase.  Never had it come up, but good to know the ruling.

Offline SomeKittens

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+10)
  • *****
  • Posts: 8102
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Practice for Newer Tournament Judges...
« Reply #24 on: February 16, 2012, 09:50:14 AM »
0
As much as we complain about "play as", this is actually a very helpful entry:

Destruction of Nehushtan (Pa)
Type: Grim Reaper • Brigade: None • Ability: None • Class: None • Special Ability: Discard one active Artifact in play. Artifact's ability is negated. • Play As: Discard one Artifact to negate its special ability. • Identifiers: False Religious Practice • Verse: II Kings 18:4 • Availability: Patriarchs booster packs (Ultra Rare).

It uses "cost - benefit" verbiage to explain "no discard = no negate".
Except that the Play-As actually changes what DoN does, therefore it's disguised as errata, therefore it is disregarded.
Mind not the ignorant fool on the other side of the screen!-BubbleBoy
Code: [Select]
postcount.add(1);

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal