Cactus Game Design Message Boards

Similarly, cards that say "a good enhancement with a Matthew reference" DO include AoC, but do NOT include AoC promo.

The reference is not on the card.

Really? If AoCP has no reference then why in the name of little green apples is AoCP still considered a New Testament card?

Two things:

1) Whuh??? (Translation: I didn't know this.)

2) This stinks!!! (Translation: I don't like this.)

Quote from: Bryon on January 26, 2010, 11:20:40 PM

Are there any cards with Errata that matter at all in this discussion?

Since when has irrelevancy kept Redemption players from having a 12 page discussion concerning something they're passionate about?

ROFLMBO!!!!!!   GABE FTW!!!!

gabe, you have won this thread!!!

Okay, here's a question: what if the card has a NT scripture reference that is really quoting an OT reference?  Do we even have any cards that do this?  If so, can it be targeted as an OT and NT reference?

OK, so it was more than one question.   

I think STAMP might be referring to NT passages that quote OT passages.  I am pretty sure that we have a card like this (in Angel Wars maybe? or maybe the set before or within a couple sets after).  I remember having a choice of which reference to put on a card because the NT reference was the same as the OT.  (EDIT: although, I might be thinking of the references in both new and old testaments to pagan sacrifices being offered to demons, not just idols.  The NT one of that is not a direct quote of the OT in that case, though.  In Deut. 32:17, "They sacrifice to demons, not gods, new things which came lately which your ancestors did not fear.", which is different than the I Corinthians 10:20 passage found on Demon behind the Idol and Pagan Sacrifices.).

Still, like professoralstad said, we look at the book in the reference box.