Author Topic: Potiphar's Wife  (Read 906 times)

Chris

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Potiphar's Wife
« on: July 30, 2014, 12:49:34 AM »
0
1. What exactly is Potiphar's Wife's ability? I'm under the impression that it is not an Instead, based on the REG entry "Cards that use the word 'instead' replace an effect with a different effect" seeming to require the actual word "Instead" in the ability. My argument is that Potiphar's Wife's ability checks after the "defeat" has been resolved, rather than insteading it. (So if I play a discard enhancement on Potiphar's Wife and my opponent cannot stop it, she won't Instead the discard, the discard will happen and then her capture ability kicks in. I believe that Assyrian Survivor, which has similar wording (If defeated, capture to opponent’s Land of Bondage), would also be affected by this. I'm currently under the impression neither is an Instead ability, but at least one other person (who's an Elder) disagrees.

2. My opponent makes a rescue attempt with a Hero and I block with Potiphar's Wife. I'm given initiative, and play an interrupt the battle and play next card, followed by a card that captures the opposing Hero. Does Potiphar's Wife's ability trigger? Part of this question is inherently linked to the answer to the first question. If she is an Instead ability, then she's interrupted and there's no problem. However, if she isn't, the issue gets slightly more complicated. I believe that, provided she isn't an Instead, her ability would trigger after the capture ability has completed, which means that her ability is no longer negated, which means she can then target the Hero she just defeated. Is this correct?

3. This scenario relies on the second scenario working the way I described. My opponent makes a rescue attempt with a Hero and I block with Potiphar's Wife. I'm given initiative, and play Moses Kills Egyptian. Provided the second scenario works, I believe this one would as well. Despite the fact that the Hero is no longer in play, I believe that abilities that target the "last enhancement played in battle" being able to work on enhancements in the discard pile set a precedence that would allow for Potiphar's Wife to target a Hero that's been set-aside, because she's specifically targeting the Heroshe just defeated. I also believe that how this would be ruled would also apply to discard, remove from the game, and abilities that might add the opposing Hero to their hand or draw pile.

4. Errata Split Altar!

Potiphar's Wife (2/2 Gold EC) - When Character defeats a male Hero in the Field of Battle, the Hero is taken prisoner and placed in your opponent's Land of Bondage and treated as a Lost Soul. Errata/Play As: All male characters defeated (by a win or stalemate) by Potiphar's Wife in battle are taken prisoner and placed in your opponent's Land of Bondage and treated as a Lost Soul.

Moses Kills Egyptian (0/4 Gold EE) - Interrupt the battle and set aside an opponent's male Hero in play for 5 turns. Then return the Hero to owner's territory.

Offline ChristianSoldier

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1613
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Potiphar's Wife
« Reply #1 on: July 30, 2014, 02:19:44 AM »
0
I am not an elder so someone could easily correct me, but according to the printed ability, it could easily be ruled as an instead (remember "instead" wasn't created until much later and some cards were retroactively made insteads) however the errata/play as implies otherwise.

The Play As/Errata says "All male characters defeated (by a win or stalemate) by Potiphar's Wife in battle..." that to me implies it checks during battle resolution not when a character gets removed by a special ability, so PW would only capture characters defeated by numbers.

Finally in the case of Moses Kill Egyptian or any other interrupt the battle card, PW's ability would be interrupted and not be able to capture the character, since it would follow the same rules as the Archer's, in that it's a delayed trigger that is interrupted and won't have a chance to reactivate until after the ability on the interrupt is complete.
If you are reading this signature, thank a physicist.

Chris

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Potiphar's Wife
« Reply #2 on: July 30, 2014, 03:03:32 AM »
0
I am not an elder so someone could easily correct me, but according to the printed ability, it could easily be ruled as an instead (remember "instead" wasn't created until much later and some cards were retroactively made insteads) however the errata/play as implies otherwise.

Are there any examples of cards retroactively given Instead abilities that didn't already use the specific word? Assyrian Survivor was printed after Instead abilities were created, yet lacks the language, which means there's precedent for Potiphar's Wife to avoid being grandfathered in, based on very similar wording on at least one post-instead card.

Quote
The Play As/Errata says "All male characters defeated (by a win or stalemate) by Potiphar's Wife in battle..." that to me implies it checks during battle resolution not when a character gets removed by a special ability, so PW would only capture characters defeated by numbers.

That Play As isn't in the forum's errata list, so either an errata slipped through the cracks, or that Play As isn't canon. The REG definition of "Defeat" also suggests there's no waiting until battle resolution to check (aside from in the case of stalemate or mutual destruction).

Quote
Finally in the case of Moses Kill Egyptian or any other interrupt the battle card, PW's ability would be interrupted and not be able to capture the character, since it would follow the same rules as the Archer's, in that it's a delayed trigger that is interrupted and won't have a chance to reactivate until after the ability on the interrupt is complete.

Assuming for a minute that Potiphar's Wife isn't an Instead (which the other questions really hinge on), I don't think PW's ability being interrupted would matter, because by the time the card checks to see if it's been triggered, the interrupt itself has completed.

Offline Redoubter

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4910
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Potiphar's Wife
« Reply #3 on: July 30, 2014, 04:56:52 PM »
0
Potiphar's Wife is an instead.

Starting with that, now into the 'why' of the matter.  Assyrian Survivor has also been ruled to be an instead, and the reason is that the ability need not have the 'instead' in order to qualify, at least not when battle resolution or defeat are being discussed:

Quote from: The REG
Abilities that describe an end of battle condition (ex: If defeated, If character defeats, If rescue attempt fails, etc.) followed by instructions about what to do when that condition is met, have an implied “instead” which causes the effect decribed in the ability to replace other effects if the condition is met.

Assyrian Survivor says "If defeated, capture to opponent’s Land of Bondage."  While there is no use of the word 'instead,' this ability is an implied 'instead' because it describes what would normally happen and gives an alternate instruction to do in its place.  That is why it is treated as an instead, even though it does not use the word (and even though it was printed after that keyword was introduced).

Potiphar's Wife uses similar terminology: "When Character defeats a male Hero in the Field of Battle, the Hero is taken prisoner and placed in your opponent's Land of Bondage..."  You have the normal outcome (the character is defeated, see below for what that may mean) and you have the new instructions (capture to your Land of Bondage).  This is an implied 'instead' and thus it is an instead ability.

Now, when does she trigger?

Quote from: The REG
A Hero is defeated when:
 The Hero is removed from the field of battle because of a special ability.
 The battle ends with the Hero being discarded by the numbers of the Evil Character(s) in battle (except in the case of mutual destruction).
 The battle ends in a stalemate.

So, if she uses a special ability to remove them from battle, or overcomes/stalemates the heroes in battle resolution, then they are defeated.  However, 'instead' of being defeated, they are captured.

In the examples given, she cannot instead any defeat that happens while she is interrupted, as with any other instead ability.  An instead must be active and in place before the event occurs in order to trigger; since she would not be active if playing a card like Moses Kills the Egyptian, the capture cannot take place instead.  However, if you were to use Potiphar and band to her while Pharaoh's Prison were in play, all evil capture and banding would be CBN.  Thus, following the Herod-withraw-capture-CBN rulings, if you used Potiphar's Wife to play any cards that defeated a male hero in the Field of Battle (note on this below), she would instead capture them, and the capture would be CBN.  You could also use cards like Moses Kills the Egyptian, since it could not interrupt the instead while it is CBN.

Lastly, the card says Field of Battle.  Unless there is an errata, that is the correct targeting to apply.  It was likely incorrectly changed to "in battle" (which only applies to the current battle) when the Play-As were being written, being an easier term for the simplicity of abilities (even though it now means something very different from the original text).

Hope this wall of text answers all questions :)

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal