Author Topic: New Rules since Nats?  (Read 1992 times)

Warrior_Monk

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
New Rules since Nats?
« on: August 24, 2010, 10:32:30 AM »
0
what are the new rulings, and when are they official?

(i.e. cannot be immune to your own alignment, and I believe something about changing healing was also mentioned)

Offline Smokey

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3216
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: New Rules since Nats?
« Reply #1 on: August 24, 2010, 10:33:57 AM »
0
Single color sites are active while not occupied, something about fortresses, ignore isn't considered harm.

Offline Professoralstad

  • Tournament Host, Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+47)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10841
  • Everything is Awesome!
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: New Rules since Nats?
« Reply #2 on: August 24, 2010, 10:39:31 AM »
0
ignore isn't considered harm.

That's not a new rule, that's been known for awhile.

There are still a few rulings that we thought would be made at Nats that Rob hasn't confirmed as official yet, but there is a thread in the PT section outlining all the new rulings, so we'll let you know when they become official. I'm guessing Rob has been a bit busy/anxious lately. He has a pretty big investment sitting at a Hong Kong dock.
Press 1 for more options.

Rawrlolsauce!

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: New Rules since Nats?
« Reply #3 on: August 24, 2010, 04:58:03 PM »
0
Andrew! Lets convince Scott to hold an impromptu tournament before the rules are announced so we don't have to follow them!

Warrior_Monk

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: New Rules since Nats?
« Reply #4 on: August 24, 2010, 05:30:07 PM »
0
Andrew! Lets convince Scott to hold an impromptu tournament before the rules are announced so we don't have to follow them!
AGREED! COMBO COMBO COMBO COMBO CONGO!!!! WILL BE REBORN!

Offline Master_Chi

  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1367
  • I choose you, Pikachu.
Re: New Rules since Nats?
« Reply #5 on: August 24, 2010, 07:32:48 PM »
0
Andrew! Lets convince Scott to hold an impromptu tournament before the rules are announced so we don't have to follow them!

Why not then play CalvinRedemption? The only rule is that you can't play it the same way twice.
I'm sorry I crammed 11 cookies in the VCR.

Offline stefferweffer

  • Trade Count: (+17)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1775
Re: New Rules since Nats?
« Reply #6 on: August 25, 2010, 11:09:46 AM »
0
Single color sites are active while not occupied, something about fortresses, ignore isn't considered harm.
Can someone explain the sites part in greater detail please?  I doubt this is saying that Pergamum works while unoccupied, but that is what I thought of when I read this.  Thanks.

Offline Smokey

  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3216
    • -
    • Midwest Region
Re: New Rules since Nats?
« Reply #7 on: August 25, 2010, 11:10:44 AM »
0
Single color sites are active while not occupied, something about fortresses, ignore isn't considered harm.
Can someone explain the sites part in greater detail please?  I doubt this is saying that Pergamum works while unoccupied, but that is what I thought of when I read this.  Thanks.

Thats exactly what it's saying.

Offline 3-Liner And Bags Of Chips

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+23)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2324
  • I'm officially a tourney host now...yippie!
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: New Rules since Nats?
« Reply #8 on: August 25, 2010, 11:14:58 AM »
0
Single color sites are active while not occupied, something about fortresses, ignore isn't considered harm.
Can someone explain the sites part in greater detail please?  I doubt this is saying that Pergamum works while unoccupied, but that is what I thought of when I read this.  Thanks.

Thats exactly what it's saying.

The ability would kick in but then the ability on the card says when occupied so it'll circle and nothing happens until it is stuffed
Polar Bears Rule Teh World
Sponsered by CountFount
http://sites.google.com/site/marylandredemption

Offline stefferweffer

  • Trade Count: (+17)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1775
Re: New Rules since Nats?
« Reply #9 on: August 25, 2010, 11:23:19 AM »
0
That's just odd.  I assume there was a new card (or cards) released that prompted this sites ruling?  Thanks again.

Offline Professoralstad

  • Tournament Host, Redemption Elder
  • Trade Count: (+47)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 10841
  • Everything is Awesome!
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: New Rules since Nats?
« Reply #10 on: August 25, 2010, 11:32:29 AM »
0
That's just odd.  I assume there was a new card (or cards) released that prompted this sites ruling?  Thanks again.

The ruling in the REG was that all Sites had to be occupied in order to have active abilities, unless they were multicolor (which only activate in battle). Herod's Dungeon made us relook at the ruling. Currently, the rule is/will be: Single-color sites are active in territory, and multicolor sites are active in battle. If other conditions apply (while occupied, etc.) then those conditions must be met. So Pergamum still only works when occupied.
Press 1 for more options.

Offline joeycauldron

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 544
  • ad astra per aspera
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: New Rules since Nats?
« Reply #11 on: November 24, 2010, 12:17:45 PM »
0
Andrew! Lets convince Scott to hold an impromptu tournament before the rules are announced so we don't have to follow them!
AGREED! COMBO COMBO COMBO COMBO CONGO!!!! WILL BE REBORN!
CONGO?
Mawwage, Mawwage is whot brwings us togethwa today, Mawwage...  ...ane Love, twue love...

Warrior_Monk

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: New Rules since Nats?
« Reply #12 on: November 24, 2010, 03:15:27 PM »
0
Winning the game in five consecutive turns. Without your opponent having a turn. Doesn't matter any more. New rule...

 


SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal