Check out our Event Calendar! View birthdays, holidays and upcoming tournaments!
Peter would negate Foul Spirit's ability (in other words, he interrupts and prevents FS's negating ability from activating). If FS's ability was Cannot be Prevented or Cannot be Negated, then FS's special ability would still work and he would negate Peter's ability.
How is Define now?
Unless you write a little longer explanation of how exactly it works, I will feel like you're misunderstanding my question When the enhancement negates the draw ability, are you saying that it then also attempts to negate any cards that were drawn by that ability and have already been put in play?
Here's how the scenario would play out: your opponent plays a negate card (a negate interrupts an ability then prevents it from occurring) to undo the draw ability, but the dominant remains in the discard pile (because it was a played card and all played cards are cannot be interrupted) and the other evil character still remains discarded since all dominant abilities are cannot be negated. So if the only card that was drawn was the dominant then your opponent's negate card would, for this scenario, be an effectively pointless play. To answer your question more directly, the negate attempts to interrupt and prevent the draw ability, not the played cards necessarily, but the negate of the draw would then cascade negate any of the abilities on the played cards unless those abilities are CBI or CBN. Did this answer your question?
So, if it was some other card played that could be negated, it would be? Just wondering what the general rule would be for this crazy but probably rare instance. So it would negate the played cards, but would it also discard them or anything?
Clear as mud?