Author Topic: Nazareth vs Mayhem (Read 7767 times)

Lamborghini_diablo · « **Reply #50 on:** October 05, 2010, 12:18:07 AM »

... that and RTS has the ability wrong.

it says "Each player must shuffle their hand and draw six."

Michael_of_the_Star · « **Reply #51 on:** October 05, 2010, 12:54:08 AM »

Would someone look at their mayhem and check the wording, because if that one and the RTS is wrong then we need to see the cards to clarify. Thanks.

ML.

Lamborghini_diablo · « **Reply #52 on:** October 05, 2010, 01:22:57 AM »

Michael, I just posted a picture of the card.... lol.

Michael_of_the_Star · « **Reply #53 on:** October 05, 2010, 02:53:01 AM »

But you said the card and the RTS is wrong.

Quote from: Lamborghini_diablo on October 05, 2010, 12:18:07 AM

... that and RTS has the ability wrong.

it says "Each player must shuffle their hand and draw six."

That is not what it said on your card. Thanks.

ML>

Master KChief · « **Reply #54 on:** October 05, 2010, 03:10:40 AM »

that is what it says in rts. 'and', not 'to'.

RTSmaniac · « **Reply #55 on:** October 05, 2010, 08:31:27 AM »

so Nazareth still stops an opponent from shuffling your hand away but you dont get to abuse thier Mayhem by adding 6 more cards to your hand. Sounds fair to me. I still dislike Nazareth. That card kills.

Lamborghini_diablo · « **Reply #56 on:** October 05, 2010, 08:59:12 AM »

Quote from: Michael_of_the_Star on October 05, 2010, 02:53:01 AM

But you said the card and the RTS is wrong.

Quote from: Lamborghini_diablo on October 05, 2010, 12:18:07 AM
... that and RTS has the ability wrong.

it says "Each player must shuffle their hand and draw six."

That is not what it said on your card. Thanks.

ML>

I never said the card itself was wrong, just RTS.

Master_Chi · « **Reply #57 on:** October 05, 2010, 09:21:36 AM »

Lambo is right, my copy of Mayhem says "to" instead of "and", but the card in RTS says "and" instead of "to"....

Michael_of_the_Star · « **Reply #58 on:** October 05, 2010, 01:24:27 PM »

Quote from: Master_Chi on October 05, 2010, 09:21:36 AM

Lambo is right, my copy of Mayhem says "to" instead of "and", but the card in RTS says "and" instead of "to"....

Oh, so the card on RTS is wrong, however the effect that they post in RTS is right. THanks.

ML>

Master KChief · « **Reply #59 on:** October 05, 2010, 02:55:28 PM »

no. no. -_-

the picture of mayhem in RTS is right. the effect in RTS is wrong.

Master_Chi · « **Reply #60 on:** October 05, 2010, 06:24:35 PM »

Quote from: Master KChief on October 05, 2010, 02:55:28 PM

no. no. -_-

the picture of mayhem in RTS is right. the effect in RTS is wrong.

Correct. Picture good, effect bad.

Rawrlolsauce! · « **Reply #61 on:** October 08, 2010, 06:54:58 PM »

Actually the text in RTS is correct. The stuff printed on the card and the stuff in the REG is incorrect, as is the image in RTS.

Michael_of_the_Star · « **Reply #62 on:** October 08, 2010, 06:57:58 PM »

Quote from: Rawrlolsauce! on October 08, 2010, 06:54:58 PM

Actually the text in RTS is correct. The stuff printed on the card and the stuff in the REG is incorrect, as is the image in RTS.

I really, I never thought of that part.

Quote from: Master_Chi on October 05, 2010, 06:24:35 PM

Quote from: Master KChief on October 05, 2010, 02:55:28 PM
no. no. -_-

the picture of mayhem in RTS is right. the effect in RTS is wrong.

I got mix up with RTS and REG, sorry.

ML.

Correct. Picture good, effect bad.

RTSmaniac · « **Reply #63 on:** October 08, 2010, 10:48:27 PM »

Quote

Actually the text in RTS is correct. The stuff printed on the card and the stuff in the REG is incorrect, as is the image in RTS.

When I read this i immediately grabbed my deck and looked at my mayhem to make sure...noob

Michael_of_the_Star · « **Reply #64 on:** October 09, 2010, 02:10:53 AM »

Actually, I am pretty sure the REG's effect and the card is right, because when we came up with this design, was suppose to shuffle to draw, but I don't know why people said is wrong.

ML.

Master KChief · « **Reply #65 on:** October 09, 2010, 02:16:39 AM »

...

the REG effect and picture is correct. rawrlolsauce was just being his usual self and joking.

Michael_of_the_Star · « **Reply #66 on:** October 09, 2010, 01:31:29 PM »

Quote from: Master KChief on October 09, 2010, 02:16:39 AM

...

the REG effect and picture is correct. rawrlolsauce was just being his usual self and joking.

So that was a joke? Laugh out loud, It seems like I need to learn how to joke around more often.

ML.

lightningninja · « **Reply #67 on:** October 09, 2010, 02:47:05 PM »

For sure. Call him a noob.

Warrior_Monk · « **Reply #68 on:** October 10, 2010, 01:07:28 AM »

(today he played Mayhem when a Nazareth was out, and he thought Gabe would get to draw six

)

Rawrlolsauce! · « **Reply #69 on:** November 03, 2010, 11:32:49 PM »

>:c.
I'm necroposting because I just saw Ring Wraith's post >:c.
1.) It was Simon the Zealot. I specifically looked for Nazareth because I'm not a noob. >:c
2.) That wasn't the reason for my disappointment. I was disappointed because he didn't shuffle his hand in. >:c
>:c

>:c

Master_Chi · « **Reply #70 on:** November 04, 2010, 09:12:19 AM »

Quote from: Rawrlolsauce! on November 03, 2010, 11:32:49 PM

>:c.
I'm necroposting because I just saw Ring Wraith's post >:c.
1.) It was Simon the Zealot. I specifically looked for Nazareth because I'm not a noob. >:c
2.) That wasn't the reason for my disappointment. I was disappointed because he didn't shuffle his hand in. >:c
>:c

>:c

Quote from: lightningninja on October 09, 2010, 02:47:05 PM

Call him a noob.

News:

Author Topic: Nazareth vs Mayhem (Read 7767 times)

Lamborghini_diablo

Lamborghini_diablo

Lamborghini_diablo

Rawrlolsauce!

Warrior_Monk

Rawrlolsauce!