« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Name on name?  (Read 1119 times)

Offline Hedgehogman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 704
  • In America!!
    • -
    • East Central Region
Name on name?
« on: January 31, 2014, 11:40:20 PM »
0
I remember Name on Name bonus being made an official rule at Nats years ago, but it does not even appear in the 4th Edition rulebook. Is this still an official rule?
Logged
I'll prove I'm not a loser, by challenging you to a children's card game!

Offline Drrek

  • Tournament Host
  • Trade Count: (+14)
  • *****
  • Posts: 2244
  • The Bee of the Sea
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Name on name?
« Reply #1 on: January 31, 2014, 11:45:38 PM »
+2
Actually if I remember correctly its still an optional rule, just one that tournaments generally run.
Logged
The user formerly known as Easty.

Offline The Guardian

  • Playtester, Redemption Elder
  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+96)
  • *****
  • Posts: 12344
  • The Stars are coming out...
    • -
    • North Central Region
Re: Name on name?
« Reply #2 on: February 01, 2014, 09:03:51 AM »
0
+1
Logged
Fortress Alstad
Have you checked the REG?
Have you looked it up in ORCID?

Offline Hedgehogman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 704
  • In America!!
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: Name on name?
« Reply #3 on: February 01, 2014, 11:10:24 AM »
0
Hmm, I could have sworn it was made official before I went on hiatus. Either way, why isn't it in the new rulebook at all?
Logged
I'll prove I'm not a loser, by challenging you to a children's card game!

Offline Redoubter

  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4910
    • -
    • Northeast Region
Re: Name on name?
« Reply #4 on: February 01, 2014, 11:32:09 AM »
0
Quote from: Hedgehogman on February 01, 2014, 11:10:24 AM
Hmm, I could have sworn it was made official before I went on hiatus. Either way, why isn't it in the new rulebook at all?

You can find it in The REG, where it is defined (even though it is not in the current rulebook, no).
Logged

Offline Hedgehogman

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 704
  • In America!!
    • -
    • East Central Region
Re: Name on name?
« Reply #5 on: February 01, 2014, 11:40:37 AM »
0
Quote from: Redoubter on February 01, 2014, 11:32:09 AM
Quote from: Hedgehogman on February 01, 2014, 11:10:24 AM
Hmm, I could have sworn it was made official before I went on hiatus. Either way, why isn't it in the new rulebook at all?

You can find it in The REG, where it is defined (even though it is not in the current rulebook, no).

Thanks!
Logged
I'll prove I'm not a loser, by challenging you to a children's card game!

Lamborghini_diablo

  • Guest
  • Trade Count: (0)
Re: Name on name?
« Reply #6 on: February 01, 2014, 02:06:51 PM »
+3
I'm still waiting for word of the "4th Edition Expanded Rulebook" that was mentioned in the new 4th edition starter booklet.

The current rulebook and REG say nothing about Type 2, and the last rulebook is way out of date on those rules.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »
 
SimplePortal 2.3.3 © 2008-2010, SimplePortal