Cactus Web Site special offer: Orders over $75 will receive a free Angel of God 2023 National Promo card while supplies last.
Really? So you've NEVER negated the special ability on an artifact with Destruction?
Quote from: EmJayBee83 on September 05, 2009, 09:20:57 AMUnder any standard definition removing something completely (negating it) is a form of reducing it.Is "Reduced" defined in Redemption?
Under any standard definition removing something completely (negating it) is a form of reducing it.
"Reduce" is a special ability that lowers the number abilities of a character, right?
So then, I Am Sustainer doesn't do anything, since "reduced" is not defined?
No one has given me a reason that "abilities" can't apply to both numerical and special abilities, given that we define "reduce" as I did above.Are there any other cards that would cause concern?
We know what these cards do. Let them do those things.
We should add and modify definitions as needed.
No one has given me a reason that "abilities" can't apply to both numerical and special abilities, given that we define "reduce" as I did above.
well i suppose self and fallen warrior just got a whole lot more powerful, seeing as how 'abilities' now blankets 'special abilities' as well. i guess those parenthesis arent really there for a reason.
I thought the big push for the past few years has been to get away from issuing rulings on a card-by-card basis. Are we really pushing to go back to that?
The Branch? Wow, where'd you pull that one from?
I'm probably not supposed to let the cat out of the bag--but what the heck...The Branch played a major role in The Guardians's T2 Strength in Weakness deck.
QuoteI'm probably not supposed to let the cat out of the bag--but what the heck...The Branch played a major role in The Guardians's T2 Strength in Weakness deck. Can't believe you betrayed my trust like that...